Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Validation of sham treatment in hyperbaric medicine: a randomised trial
View through CrossRef
Introduction: This study aimed to determine the lowest possible atmospheric pressure in the 111−152 kPa (1.1−1.5 atmospheres absolute [atm abs]) range that would require the patients to equalise their ears, allowing an effective sham for a 203 kPa (2.0 atm abs) hyperbaric exposure. Methods: We performed a randomised controlled study on 60 volunteers divided into 3 groups (compression to 111, 132 and 152 kPa (1.1, 1.3, 1.5 atm abs) to determine the minimum pressure to obtain blinding. Secondly, we applied additional blinding strategies (faster compression with ventilation during the fictitious compression time, heating at compression, cooling at decompression) on 25 new volunteers in order to enhance blinding. Results: The number of participants who did not believe they had been compressed to 203 kPa was significantly higher in the 111 kPa compressed arm than in the other two arms (11/18 vs 5/19 and 4/18 respectively; P = 0.049 and P = 0.041, Fisher’s exact test). There was no difference between compressions to 132 and 152 kPa. By applying additional blinding strategies, the number of participants who believed they had been compressed to 203 kPa increased to 86.5 %. Conclusions: A compression to 132 kPa, (1.3 atm abs, 3 metres of seawater equivalent) combined with the additional blinding strategies of forced ventilation, enclosure heating and compression in five minutes, simulates a therapeutic compression table and can be used as a hyperbaric placebo.
Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine Journal
Title: Validation of sham treatment in hyperbaric medicine: a randomised trial
Description:
Introduction: This study aimed to determine the lowest possible atmospheric pressure in the 111−152 kPa (1.
1−1.
5 atmospheres absolute [atm abs]) range that would require the patients to equalise their ears, allowing an effective sham for a 203 kPa (2.
0 atm abs) hyperbaric exposure.
Methods: We performed a randomised controlled study on 60 volunteers divided into 3 groups (compression to 111, 132 and 152 kPa (1.
1, 1.
3, 1.
5 atm abs) to determine the minimum pressure to obtain blinding.
Secondly, we applied additional blinding strategies (faster compression with ventilation during the fictitious compression time, heating at compression, cooling at decompression) on 25 new volunteers in order to enhance blinding.
Results: The number of participants who did not believe they had been compressed to 203 kPa was significantly higher in the 111 kPa compressed arm than in the other two arms (11/18 vs 5/19 and 4/18 respectively; P = 0.
049 and P = 0.
041, Fisher’s exact test).
There was no difference between compressions to 132 and 152 kPa.
By applying additional blinding strategies, the number of participants who believed they had been compressed to 203 kPa increased to 86.
5 %.
Conclusions: A compression to 132 kPa, (1.
3 atm abs, 3 metres of seawater equivalent) combined with the additional blinding strategies of forced ventilation, enclosure heating and compression in five minutes, simulates a therapeutic compression table and can be used as a hyperbaric placebo.
Related Results
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Hyperbaric medicine simulation education curriculum: CNS toxicity during Treatment Table 6 and intubated ICU patient with mucous plugging
Hyperbaric medicine simulation education curriculum: CNS toxicity during Treatment Table 6 and intubated ICU patient with mucous plugging
Introduction/Background: The incidence of complications and number of critically ill patients in hyperbaric medicine is relatively low [1]. This poses a challenge to those tasked w...
Benchmarking observational studies against randomised trials
Benchmarking observational studies against randomised trials
<p dir="ltr">Randomised trials are regarded as the gold standard in evaluating the effectiveness and safety of medical interventions, but they are not always feasible due to ...
Benchmarking observational studies against randomised trials
Benchmarking observational studies against randomised trials
<p dir="ltr">Randomised trials are regarded as the gold standard in evaluating the effectiveness and safety of medical interventions, but they are not always feasible due to ...
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels increases after hyperbaric oxygen therapy in diabetic patients
N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels increases after hyperbaric oxygen therapy in diabetic patients
Purpose Diabetic patients receive hyperbaric oxygen therapy for non-healing lower extremity ulcers. Exposure to hyperbaric hyperoxia during hyperbaric oxygen therapy may affect car...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Eye tracker outcomes in a randomized trial of 40 sessions of hyperbaric oxygen or sham in participants with persistent post concussive symptoms
Eye tracker outcomes in a randomized trial of 40 sessions of hyperbaric oxygen or sham in participants with persistent post concussive symptoms
Purpose: Eye movements may offer a sensitive method to measure response to intervention in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Methods: The Brain Injury and Mechanisms of Action of...
The Time Course of Ineffective Sham Blinding During 1mA tDCS
The Time Course of Ineffective Sham Blinding During 1mA tDCS
Abstract
Background
Studies using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) typically compare the eff...

