Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The efficacy of DPP IV inhibitors as adjunct therapy for patients with auto-immune Diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
View through CrossRef
Rationale
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is characterized by autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β-cells, leading to insulin deficiency and hyperglycemia. Although insulin therapy remains the cornerstone of T1DM management, achieving optimal glycemic control remains challenging. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, approved for type 2 diabetes, enhance endogenous incretin action and may enhance β-cell function. Some clinical trials have explored their adjunctive use in T1DM. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DPP-4 inhibitors as an adjunct to insulin in patients with T1DM.
Methods
We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline (OVID), Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to January 2025 for eligible studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating DPP-4 inhibitors versus placebo, both on top of insulin therapy for at least 12 weeks in T1DM patients, were included. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included blood glucose, C-peptide, insulin dosage, BMI, weight, adverse events, and HOMA2-β scores. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, with effect sizes expressed as mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results
Out of 1,117 identified studies, seven RCTs comprising 333 participants (176 in the experimental group, 157 in the control group) were included. The addition of DPP-4 inhibitors did not result in a significant or sustained reduction in HbA1c overall, except for a transient improvement between 3 and 6 months (MD −0.10%, 95% CI −0.16 to −0.05, p = 0.0003). DPP-4 inhibitors significantly reduced daily insulin requirements, particularly bolus doses, and postprandial blood glucose (by −34.40 mg/dL), especially in patients with a BMI < 25 kg/m² and diabetes duration <3 years. No significant effects were observed on weight, BMI, fasting blood glucose, fasting or postprandial C-peptide beyond three months. HOMA2-β scores were significantly higher with DPP-4 inhibitors. Safety outcomes were comparable between groups.
Conclusions
DPP-4 inhibitors appear safe as adjunct therapy to insulin in patients with T1DM. Although they do not offer sustained HbA1c reduction, they may reduce daily insulin requirements, improve postprandial glucose, and transiently enhance β-cell function. Further large-scale studies are needed to better define the subgroups that might benefit from this strategy.
Registration
This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024610965)
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Title: The efficacy of DPP IV inhibitors as adjunct therapy for patients with auto-immune Diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Description:
Rationale
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is characterized by autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β-cells, leading to insulin deficiency and hyperglycemia.
Although insulin therapy remains the cornerstone of T1DM management, achieving optimal glycemic control remains challenging.
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, approved for type 2 diabetes, enhance endogenous incretin action and may enhance β-cell function.
Some clinical trials have explored their adjunctive use in T1DM.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DPP-4 inhibitors as an adjunct to insulin in patients with T1DM.
Methods
We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline (OVID), Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.
gov up to January 2025 for eligible studies.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating DPP-4 inhibitors versus placebo, both on top of insulin therapy for at least 12 weeks in T1DM patients, were included.
The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c.
Secondary outcomes included blood glucose, C-peptide, insulin dosage, BMI, weight, adverse events, and HOMA2-β scores.
Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.
0 tool.
Data were pooled using a random-effects model, with effect sizes expressed as mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results
Out of 1,117 identified studies, seven RCTs comprising 333 participants (176 in the experimental group, 157 in the control group) were included.
The addition of DPP-4 inhibitors did not result in a significant or sustained reduction in HbA1c overall, except for a transient improvement between 3 and 6 months (MD −0.
10%, 95% CI −0.
16 to −0.
05, p = 0.
0003).
DPP-4 inhibitors significantly reduced daily insulin requirements, particularly bolus doses, and postprandial blood glucose (by −34.
40 mg/dL), especially in patients with a BMI < 25 kg/m² and diabetes duration <3 years.
No significant effects were observed on weight, BMI, fasting blood glucose, fasting or postprandial C-peptide beyond three months.
HOMA2-β scores were significantly higher with DPP-4 inhibitors.
Safety outcomes were comparable between groups.
Conclusions
DPP-4 inhibitors appear safe as adjunct therapy to insulin in patients with T1DM.
Although they do not offer sustained HbA1c reduction, they may reduce daily insulin requirements, improve postprandial glucose, and transiently enhance β-cell function.
Further large-scale studies are needed to better define the subgroups that might benefit from this strategy.
Registration
This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024610965).
Related Results
Therapeutic potential of SGLT-2 inhibitors and DDP4 inhibitors in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and benign prostatic hyperplasia
Therapeutic potential of SGLT-2 inhibitors and DDP4 inhibitors in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and benign prostatic hyperplasia
Background. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has recently been linked to diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance. This study aims to explore whether the use of either sodium-glu...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
[(dpp‐bian)GaGa(dpp‐bian)] and [(dpp‐bian)ZnGa(dpp‐bian)]: Synthesis, Molecular Structures, and DFT Studies of These Novel Bimetallic Molecular Compounds
[(dpp‐bian)GaGa(dpp‐bian)] and [(dpp‐bian)ZnGa(dpp‐bian)]: Synthesis, Molecular Structures, and DFT Studies of These Novel Bimetallic Molecular Compounds
Abstract1,2‐Bis[(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imino]acenaphthene) (dpp‐bian) stabilizes gallium–gallium and zinc–gallium bonds (compounds 1–3). The compound [(dpp‐bian)GaGa(dpp‐bian)] (2...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
SAT-413 Does Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Exacerbate Graves’ Disease?
SAT-413 Does Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Exacerbate Graves’ Disease?
Abstract
Abstract: [Background] Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) is expressed as CD26 on the surface of immune cells including T cells, suggesting that inhibition of D...
The Impact of IL28B Gene Polymorphisms on Drug Responses
The Impact of IL28B Gene Polymorphisms on Drug Responses
To achieve high therapeutic efficacy in the patient, information on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics is required. With the development of science and techno...
EPD Electronic Pathogen Detection v1
EPD Electronic Pathogen Detection v1
Electronic pathogen detection (EPD) is a non - invasive, rapid, affordable, point- of- care test, for Covid 19 resulting from infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus. EPD scanning techno...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

