Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Marcellinus and Illyricum

View through CrossRef
Abstract According to Cassiodorus (Inst. r.17. 2), Marcellinus was an Illyrian (Ilfyricianus) and this information must be considered accurate. After all, Cassiodorus was familiar with the full corpus of Marcel linus’ work; more importantly, he was in close contact with the Latin-speaking community of Constantinople amongst whom the chronicle found its first readers. Nor is it impossible that in Con stantinople in the late 54os/ early 550s Cassiodorus had actually met Marcellinus, or people who had known him (if the chronicler was now deceased). Yet, even without Cassiodorus’ statement we would be compelled to think Marcellinus an Illyrian simply because he has so much to say about Illyricum in the chronicle; and what he does say is generally of a precise and relatively full nature, suggesting knowledge of local personalities, geography and affairs. Henceforward, the task is to set out the Illyrian back ground and context of the chronicle; first, by defining exactly what area Marcellinus and Cassiodorus understood to be encom-passed by ‘Illyricum’, and then by amplifying and explaining the information in the chronicle in order to discover what Marcel linus’ native region meant to him. His Illyrian background and identity governed the selection of material for his chronicle, shaped the story he told, and reflected his own personal perspective on events in that region.
Title: Marcellinus and Illyricum
Description:
Abstract According to Cassiodorus (Inst.
r.
17.
2), Marcellinus was an Illyrian (Ilfyricianus) and this information must be considered accurate.
After all, Cassiodorus was familiar with the full corpus of Marcel linus’ work; more importantly, he was in close contact with the Latin-speaking community of Constantinople amongst whom the chronicle found its first readers.
Nor is it impossible that in Con stantinople in the late 54os/ early 550s Cassiodorus had actually met Marcellinus, or people who had known him (if the chronicler was now deceased).
Yet, even without Cassiodorus’ statement we would be compelled to think Marcellinus an Illyrian simply because he has so much to say about Illyricum in the chronicle; and what he does say is generally of a precise and relatively full nature, suggesting knowledge of local personalities, geography and affairs.
Henceforward, the task is to set out the Illyrian back ground and context of the chronicle; first, by defining exactly what area Marcellinus and Cassiodorus understood to be encom-passed by ‘Illyricum’, and then by amplifying and explaining the information in the chronicle in order to discover what Marcel linus’ native region meant to him.
His Illyrian background and identity governed the selection of material for his chronicle, shaped the story he told, and reflected his own personal perspective on events in that region.

Related Results

Marcellinus and Constantinople
Marcellinus and Constantinople
Abstract Marcellinus came to Constantinople from his native Illyricum around the turn of the sixth century and spent the rest of his life in the capital and wrote hi...
The Continuator of Marcellinus
The Continuator of Marcellinus
Abstract Marcellinus wrote his chronicle as a continuation of that of Jerome from 379 to 518 and later updated it to 534. Just as Marcellinus continued Jerome, Marce...
Chronicle Writing in Late Antiquity
Chronicle Writing in Late Antiquity
Abstract No manuscript title for Marcellinus’ chronicle survives except those inserted by medieval scribes. In fact the chronicle may not have had its own title,just...
The Chronicle’s Afterlife
The Chronicle’s Afterlife
Abstract How quickly after 518, and then after 534, the chronicle of Marcellinus gained popularity and in what circles cannot be determined. It may have attracted th...
Introduction: Analysing Chronicles
Introduction: Analysing Chronicles
Abstract In the early 520s, before Justinian began his long tenure of the Roman throne, one of his officials was a fellow-Illyrian named Marcellinus. He has become b...
Julian the Apostate, Claudius Mamertinus, and Ammianus Marcellinus: Filling in a “Blank Spot”?
Julian the Apostate, Claudius Mamertinus, and Ammianus Marcellinus: Filling in a “Blank Spot”?
Flavius Claudius Julianus, often referred to as “Julian the Apostate,” ruled the Roman Empire from early 360 AD until his death in battle on June 26th, 363 AD. Despite his brief re...
Constructing the Chronicle
Constructing the Chronicle
Abstract The chronicle of Marcellinus, like any similar work, represents its author’s attempt to constitute a picture of the past which is meaningful for his contemp...
Marcellinus Comes: The Man and his Work
Marcellinus Comes: The Man and his Work
Abstract Any historical work is inevitably permeated and shaped by the viewpoint and culture of its author. To understand the viewpoint and culture which permeated a...

Back to Top