Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Plant functional traits and the entangled phenotype

View through CrossRef
Abstract Integrated phenotypes consist of multiple traits with enough coordination within and across organs to result in viable individuals, which not only respond to the surrounding environment but also modify it in myriad ways. It is the individual organisms that are the target of ecological sorting and evolutionary selection and the ones that affect other organisms, ecosystem properties and benefits and detriments to people. These hardly controversial statements are at the basis of trait‐based plant functional ecology and evolutionary biology, and the notion of effect traits is arguably implicit in the concepts of extended phenotype, niche construction and indirect genetic effects developed in the context of evolutionary biology. Yet, the practices of trait‐based plant functional ecology and evolutionary ecology have remained largely disconnected. In addition, despite the abundant evidence of trait coordination at the whole‐organism level, an arguably important portion of trait‐based plant functional ecology is now focusing on isolated traits, response traits in particular. Here, I revisit the concepts of specific response functions (SRFs) and specific effect functions (SEFs), previously developed in the context of trait‐based functional ecology, in the light of ‘genes to ecosystems’ approaches developed in evolutionary biology. I argue that SEFs can be fruitfully integrated with the concept of ‘extended phenotype sensu lato’, which relaxes the requirement of being heritable in the traditional sense or feeding back onto the fitness of the organism that bears the genes responsible for it. I discuss connections and gaps between the bodies of literature on plant functional traits, phenotypic integration and ‘genes to ecosystems’ approaches and propose to explore an ‘entangled’ perspective: Within the integuments of a plant (or other organism), functional traits are coordinated in integrated restricted phenotypes. In addition, beyond their integuments, plants co‐determine their immediate environments via their SEFs. This extended phenotype sensu lato interweaves with those of co‐existing organisms of different species, co‐constructing and maintaining structures and microenvironments which can be conceived as joint multispecies extended phenotypes sensu lato. Finally, I point to directions in which tighter links among these fields would be fruitful and a few ways to start incorporating the ‘entangled’ perspective in trait‐based plant functional ecology, nature stewardship and climate change mitigation and adaptation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Title: Plant functional traits and the entangled phenotype
Description:
Abstract Integrated phenotypes consist of multiple traits with enough coordination within and across organs to result in viable individuals, which not only respond to the surrounding environment but also modify it in myriad ways.
It is the individual organisms that are the target of ecological sorting and evolutionary selection and the ones that affect other organisms, ecosystem properties and benefits and detriments to people.
These hardly controversial statements are at the basis of trait‐based plant functional ecology and evolutionary biology, and the notion of effect traits is arguably implicit in the concepts of extended phenotype, niche construction and indirect genetic effects developed in the context of evolutionary biology.
Yet, the practices of trait‐based plant functional ecology and evolutionary ecology have remained largely disconnected.
In addition, despite the abundant evidence of trait coordination at the whole‐organism level, an arguably important portion of trait‐based plant functional ecology is now focusing on isolated traits, response traits in particular.
Here, I revisit the concepts of specific response functions (SRFs) and specific effect functions (SEFs), previously developed in the context of trait‐based functional ecology, in the light of ‘genes to ecosystems’ approaches developed in evolutionary biology.
I argue that SEFs can be fruitfully integrated with the concept of ‘extended phenotype sensu lato’, which relaxes the requirement of being heritable in the traditional sense or feeding back onto the fitness of the organism that bears the genes responsible for it.
I discuss connections and gaps between the bodies of literature on plant functional traits, phenotypic integration and ‘genes to ecosystems’ approaches and propose to explore an ‘entangled’ perspective: Within the integuments of a plant (or other organism), functional traits are coordinated in integrated restricted phenotypes.
In addition, beyond their integuments, plants co‐determine their immediate environments via their SEFs.
This extended phenotype sensu lato interweaves with those of co‐existing organisms of different species, co‐constructing and maintaining structures and microenvironments which can be conceived as joint multispecies extended phenotypes sensu lato.
Finally, I point to directions in which tighter links among these fields would be fruitful and a few ways to start incorporating the ‘entangled’ perspective in trait‐based plant functional ecology, nature stewardship and climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Related Results

Mean annual temperature mainly drives spatial pattern of plant functional traits in inland arid and semi-arid areas
Mean annual temperature mainly drives spatial pattern of plant functional traits in inland arid and semi-arid areas
The distribution pattern of different plant functional traits in arid and semi-arid areas and their environmental impact mechanism are still unclear. The aim of this study is to el...
Analysis of the main effect clustering and decision-making coefficients for F2 generation of upland cotton in Southern Xinjiang
Analysis of the main effect clustering and decision-making coefficients for F2 generation of upland cotton in Southern Xinjiang
Abstract Yield and fibre quality traits respectively accounting for 4 and 5 of their 278 varieties (lines) and their 784 F2 crosses of upland cotton were for their additive...
Genetic study of reproductive, dairy and growth traits in Guzerá cattle
Genetic study of reproductive, dairy and growth traits in Guzerá cattle
The Guzerá breed is an important Brazilian genetic resource and has been widely used as a pure breed and in crossbreeding strategies to produce animals adapted to tropical climatic...
Multivariate Analysis Of Potato Genotypes For Genetic Diversity
Multivariate Analysis Of Potato Genotypes For Genetic Diversity
Sustainable production of food crops relies on germplasm improvement and genetic diversity that helps to identify appropriate parents, which is very important step in breeding of g...
Trait Perspective
Trait Perspective
Personality traits, or relatively enduring and global patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving, are thought to be a foundational element of personality by many researchers. Gord...
Morpho-Agronomic Characterization of Ethiopian Black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) Genotypes
Morpho-Agronomic Characterization of Ethiopian Black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) Genotypes
Abstract This study was conducted to investigate the variability of Ethiopian black cumin genotypes by using morpho-agronomic traits. Sixty-four genotypes were tested at De...
Integrating defense and leaf economic spectrum traits in a tropical savanna plant
Integrating defense and leaf economic spectrum traits in a tropical savanna plant
IntroductionAllocation to plant defense traits likely depends on resource supply, herbivory, and other plant functional traits such as the leaf economic spectrum (LES) traits. Yet,...

Back to Top