Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Hirst v United Kingdom [2005] ECHR 681, European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber)
View through CrossRef
Essential Cases: Public Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Hirst v United Kingdom [2005] ECHR 681, European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber). The document also includes supporting commentary from author Thomas Webb.
Title: Hirst v United Kingdom [2005] ECHR 681, European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber)
Description:
Essential Cases: Public Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments.
This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Hirst v United Kingdom [2005] ECHR 681, European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber).
The document also includes supporting commentary from author Thomas Webb.
Related Results
European Yearbook on Human Rights 2020
European Yearbook on Human Rights 2020
In light of the 30th anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in 2019, the twelfth edition of the European Yearbook on Human Rights is dedicated to the rights of...
The European Legal Order
The European Legal Order
Chapter 3 shows that the confluence of the law of the European Union and of the European Convention on Human Rights is a European legal order worthy of the name. It outlines the la...
Historical Dictionary of Human Rights and Humanitarian Organizations
Historical Dictionary of Human Rights and Humanitarian Organizations
The Historical Dictionary of Human Rights and Humanitarian Organizations, Third Edition defines the core concepts of human rights and humanitarian law. It relates the major interna...
Human Rights in the Private Sphere
Human Rights in the Private Sphere
Abstract
This book challenges several traditional assumptions concerning human rights. In particular it challenges the presumption that the fundamental rights and fr...
The Rights of Roma in European Courts
The Rights of Roma in European Courts
Abstract
This edited volume aims to critically analyse Roma rights cases before European courts, so as to explore the extent to which strategic litigation can and do...
Comparative Human Rights Law
Comparative Human Rights Law
Abstract
Courts in different jurisdictions face similar human rights questions. Does the death penalty breach human rights? Does freedom of speech include racist spe...
Introductory Note
Introductory Note
In 2015 the Strasbourg Court decided many cases of legal significance. The most important were given by the Court’s Grand Chamber of the Court, which issued a total of nineteen jud...
Responsive Human Rights
Responsive Human Rights
This open access book asks, who is a vulnerable person in human rights law?
It assesses the treatment of vulnerability by the European Court of Human Rights, an area that...

