Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Compatibility of Oral Morphine Sulfate Solution with Enteral Feeding Products
View through CrossRef
OBJECTIVE:
Patients with terminal cancer often receive continuous enteral nutrition and oral medications concomitantly through nasogastric or gastrostomy feeding tubes. This study evaluated in vitro the compatibility of morphine sulfate (MS) solution 2 mg/mL (Roxane Laboratories) with three enteral nutrition products (Jevity [J], Osmolite-HN [O], and Pulmocare [P]) at 22 and 37 °C for 48 hours and J alone at 50 °C for 48 hours.
METHODS:
Mixtures containing 1 mg/mL MS were prepared with each enteral product: J, O, and P (Ross Laboratories). Serial samples (1 mL) were collected from each mixture and analyzed for morphine by reverse-phase HPLC. An analog pH meter was used to measure the pH of each mixture at scheduled intervals.
RESULTS:
The addition of MS 2 mg/mL (MS2) to J caused an immediate decrease in pH from 6.24 ± 0.01 to 4.96 ± 0.05 and a noticeable precipitate/phase separation. No phase separation was observed with a 1 mg/mL mixture of MS and J, O, and P when they were prepared with a more concentrated MS solution (20 mg/mL, MS20) (Roxanol Intensol). The pH declined linearly for all three enteral feeding products as the MS20 concentration was increased from 0 to 1 mg/mL. The precipitate observed in the mixture of MS2 with J was probably caused by the decrease in pH, which was caused by the greater volume fraction of MS solution. The concentration of morphine in the supernatant of a MS2/J solution was 0.83 mg/mL, and the concentration of MS in a homogeneous MS20/J solution was 0.86 mg/mL. At 48 hours, there was negligible (<2 percent) morphine decomposition in all MS admixtures at all temperatures. No microbial growth was observed in any admixture at 24 hours. Electrophoretic analysis demonstrated equal protein migration and molecular weight distribution for J and MS/J solutions.
CONCLUSIONS:
MS is stable in enteral feeding solutions at temperatures from 22 to 50 °C. MS2 is associated with a pH-dependent protein precipitation (but not destruction of the proteins), resulting in disproportionate concentrations of morphine in the supernatant and precipitate. This incompatibility may adversely affect enteral feeding analgesic delivery. We, therefore, recommend MS 20 mg/mL for this method of oral MS delivery, because of its superior compatibility and stability with enteral feeding products.
Title: Compatibility of Oral Morphine Sulfate Solution with Enteral Feeding Products
Description:
OBJECTIVE:
Patients with terminal cancer often receive continuous enteral nutrition and oral medications concomitantly through nasogastric or gastrostomy feeding tubes.
This study evaluated in vitro the compatibility of morphine sulfate (MS) solution 2 mg/mL (Roxane Laboratories) with three enteral nutrition products (Jevity [J], Osmolite-HN [O], and Pulmocare [P]) at 22 and 37 °C for 48 hours and J alone at 50 °C for 48 hours.
METHODS:
Mixtures containing 1 mg/mL MS were prepared with each enteral product: J, O, and P (Ross Laboratories).
Serial samples (1 mL) were collected from each mixture and analyzed for morphine by reverse-phase HPLC.
An analog pH meter was used to measure the pH of each mixture at scheduled intervals.
RESULTS:
The addition of MS 2 mg/mL (MS2) to J caused an immediate decrease in pH from 6.
24 ± 0.
01 to 4.
96 ± 0.
05 and a noticeable precipitate/phase separation.
No phase separation was observed with a 1 mg/mL mixture of MS and J, O, and P when they were prepared with a more concentrated MS solution (20 mg/mL, MS20) (Roxanol Intensol).
The pH declined linearly for all three enteral feeding products as the MS20 concentration was increased from 0 to 1 mg/mL.
The precipitate observed in the mixture of MS2 with J was probably caused by the decrease in pH, which was caused by the greater volume fraction of MS solution.
The concentration of morphine in the supernatant of a MS2/J solution was 0.
83 mg/mL, and the concentration of MS in a homogeneous MS20/J solution was 0.
86 mg/mL.
At 48 hours, there was negligible (<2 percent) morphine decomposition in all MS admixtures at all temperatures.
No microbial growth was observed in any admixture at 24 hours.
Electrophoretic analysis demonstrated equal protein migration and molecular weight distribution for J and MS/J solutions.
CONCLUSIONS:
MS is stable in enteral feeding solutions at temperatures from 22 to 50 °C.
MS2 is associated with a pH-dependent protein precipitation (but not destruction of the proteins), resulting in disproportionate concentrations of morphine in the supernatant and precipitate.
This incompatibility may adversely affect enteral feeding analgesic delivery.
We, therefore, recommend MS 20 mg/mL for this method of oral MS delivery, because of its superior compatibility and stability with enteral feeding products.
Related Results
FORMULASI FORMULA ENTERAL BLENDERIZED NON MILK BASED
FORMULASI FORMULA ENTERAL BLENDERIZED NON MILK BASED
ABSTRACTBackground: Hospital enteral formula with lactose-free content is still rare, meanwhile lactose-free enteral food is needed, especially with patients who have lactose intol...
Clinical pharmacology of morphine in infants and children
Clinical pharmacology of morphine in infants and children
Morphine is used to treat pain, for treatment of opioid dependence, and neonatal abstinence syndrome. Morphine is modestly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract whereas after re...
Morphine 6‐glucuronide: a metabolite of morphine with greater emetic potency than morphine in the ferret
Morphine 6‐glucuronide: a metabolite of morphine with greater emetic potency than morphine in the ferret
The emetic potencies of morphine and its metabolite morphine 6‐glucuronide have been determined in the ferret by constructing dose‐response curves for mean total retches and vomits...
Early Enteral Feeding Versus Delayed Enteral Nutrition: Effects On Morbidity After Intestinal Surgery; A Prospective Study
Early Enteral Feeding Versus Delayed Enteral Nutrition: Effects On Morbidity After Intestinal Surgery; A Prospective Study
Routine practice after bowel anastomoses has been to keep patient nil per oral till the return of bowel sound with a belief that this will prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting...
PERBANDINGAN SKALA NYERI PASIEN PASCA OPERASI SEKSIO SESAREA YANG DIBERIKAN MORFIN INTRATEKAL DENGAN MORFIN INTRATEKAL DITAMBAH KETOROLAK INTRA
PERBANDINGAN SKALA NYERI PASIEN PASCA OPERASI SEKSIO SESAREA YANG DIBERIKAN MORFIN INTRATEKAL DENGAN MORFIN INTRATEKAL DITAMBAH KETOROLAK INTRA
Abstract: Caesarean section is one of the most common procedures performed. It is estimated that 15% of births worldwide and 21.1% of those in developed countries occur via cesarea...
Enteral tube feeding practices and associated factors among nurses working in South Wollo Zone Specialized and General Hospitals, Wollo, Ethiopia, 2022
Enteral tube feeding practices and associated factors among nurses working in South Wollo Zone Specialized and General Hospitals, Wollo, Ethiopia, 2022
BackgroundEnteral tube feeding is recommended as a route for nutrient delivery in critically ill patients. The practice of enteral tube feeding by nurses significantly influences p...
Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
Background: Enteral nutrition is said to be better than parenteral nutrition for providing nutrition support to humans. Purpose: To assess the literature documenting the assertions...
Sex differences in the daily rhythmicity of morphine consumption after major abdominal surgery
Sex differences in the daily rhythmicity of morphine consumption after major abdominal surgery
Objective: The sex of the patients has been shown to affect postoperative pain and morphine consumption; still a clear understanding able to explain the reasons behind this differe...

