Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Opposition and Implication in Aristotelian Diagrams

View through CrossRef
In logical geometry, Aristotelian diagrams are studied in a systematic fashion. Recent developments in this field have shown that the square of opposition generalizes in two ways, which correspond precisely to the theory of opposition (leading to α-structures) and the theory of implication (leading to ladders) it exhibits. These two kinds of Aristotelian diagrams are dual to each other, in the sense that they are the oppositional and implicative counterpart of the same construction. This paper formalizes this duality as OI-companionship, explores its properties, and applies it to various σ-diagrams. This investigation shows that OI-companionship has some interesting, but unusual behaviors. While it is symmetric, and works well on the level of Aristotelian families, it lacks (ir)reflexivity, transitivity, functionality, and seriality. However, we show that all important Aristotelian families from the literature do have a unique OI-companion. These findings explore the limits that arise when extending the duality between opposition and implication beyond the limits of α-structures and ladders.
Title: Opposition and Implication in Aristotelian Diagrams
Description:
In logical geometry, Aristotelian diagrams are studied in a systematic fashion.
Recent developments in this field have shown that the square of opposition generalizes in two ways, which correspond precisely to the theory of opposition (leading to α-structures) and the theory of implication (leading to ladders) it exhibits.
These two kinds of Aristotelian diagrams are dual to each other, in the sense that they are the oppositional and implicative counterpart of the same construction.
This paper formalizes this duality as OI-companionship, explores its properties, and applies it to various σ-diagrams.
This investigation shows that OI-companionship has some interesting, but unusual behaviors.
While it is symmetric, and works well on the level of Aristotelian families, it lacks (ir)reflexivity, transitivity, functionality, and seriality.
However, we show that all important Aristotelian families from the literature do have a unique OI-companion.
These findings explore the limits that arise when extending the duality between opposition and implication beyond the limits of α-structures and ladders.

Related Results

The Modal Logic of Aristotelian Diagrams
The Modal Logic of Aristotelian Diagrams
In this paper, we introduce and study AD-logic, i.e., a system of (hybrid) modal logic that can be used to reason about Aristotelian diagrams. The language of AD-logic, LAD, is int...
Leonardi.DB: A Database of Aristotelian Diagrams
Leonardi.DB: A Database of Aristotelian Diagrams
Aristotelian diagrams, such as the square of opposition, are among the oldest and most well-known types of logical diagrams. Within the burgeoning research program of logical geome...
Alpha-Structures and Ladders in Logical Geometry
Alpha-Structures and Ladders in Logical Geometry
AbstractAristotelian diagrams, such as the square of opposition and other, more complex diagrams, have a long history in philosophical logic. Alpha-structures and ladders are two s...
Opposition Powers in Parliamentary Democracies
Opposition Powers in Parliamentary Democracies
This article examines what institutionalized role should constitutions give to opposition legislators in the law-making process in parliamentary democracies. &...
Morphisms between Aristotelian Diagrams
Morphisms between Aristotelian Diagrams
In logical geometry, Aristotelian diagrams are studied in a precise and systematic way. Although there has recently been a good amount of progress in logical geometry, it is still ...
Morphisms Between Aristotelian Diagrams
Morphisms Between Aristotelian Diagrams
AbstractIn logical geometry, Aristotelian diagrams are studied in a precise and systematic way. Although there has recently been a good amount of progress in logical geometry, it i...
Towards a Model Theory of Venn Diagrams
Towards a Model Theory of Venn Diagrams
One of the goals of logical analysis is to construct mathematical models of various practices of deductive inference. Traditionally, this is done by means of giving semantics and r...
UML Class Diagram Classification Using Category Theory
UML Class Diagram Classification Using Category Theory
To effectively evaluate a system that performs operations on UML class diagrams, it is essential to cover a large variety of different types of diagrams. The coverage of the diagra...

Back to Top