Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Governance mediation in the era of disruptive technologies: unveiling new perspectives on the risk of material misstatements

View through CrossRef
Purpose This study aims to examine the mediating effects of corporate governance mechanisms like the board of directors on the association between disruptive technology adoption by audit clients and the risk of material misstatements, including inherent risk and control risk. In particular, the authors study the mediating effects of board characteristics such as board size, independence and gender diversity. Design/methodology/approach Based on a sample of 100 audit clients listed on the FTSE 100 from 2015 to 2021, this study uses structural equation modelling to test the research objectives. Findings The findings indicate a significant and negative association between disruptive technology adoption by audit clients and inherent risk. However, there is no significant evidence observed for control risk. The utilisation of disruptive technology by the audit client has a significant impact on the board characteristics, resulting in an increase in board size, greater independence and gender diversity. The authors also find strong evidence that board independence mediates the association between disruptive technology usage and both inherent risk and control risk. In addition, board size and gender exhibit distinct and differential mediating effects on the association and across the two types of risks. Research limitations/implications The study reveals that the significant role of using disruptive technology by audit clients in reducing the risk of material misstatements is closely associated with the board of directors, which makes audit clients place greater emphasis on the construction of effective corporate governance. Practical implications This study offers essential primary evidence that can assist policymakers and standard setters in formulating guidance and recommendations for board size, independence and gender quotas, ensuring the enhancement of effective governance and supporting the future of audit within the next generation of digital services. Social implications With respect to relevant stakeholders, it is imperative for audit clients to recognise that corporate governance represents a fundamental means of addressing the ramifications of applying disruptive technology, particularly as they pertain to inherent and control risks within the audit client. Originality/value This study contributes to the existing literature by investigating the joint impact of corporate governance and the utilisation of disruptive technology by audit clients on inherent risk and control risk, which has not been investigated by previous research.
Title: Governance mediation in the era of disruptive technologies: unveiling new perspectives on the risk of material misstatements
Description:
Purpose This study aims to examine the mediating effects of corporate governance mechanisms like the board of directors on the association between disruptive technology adoption by audit clients and the risk of material misstatements, including inherent risk and control risk.
In particular, the authors study the mediating effects of board characteristics such as board size, independence and gender diversity.
Design/methodology/approach Based on a sample of 100 audit clients listed on the FTSE 100 from 2015 to 2021, this study uses structural equation modelling to test the research objectives.
Findings The findings indicate a significant and negative association between disruptive technology adoption by audit clients and inherent risk.
However, there is no significant evidence observed for control risk.
The utilisation of disruptive technology by the audit client has a significant impact on the board characteristics, resulting in an increase in board size, greater independence and gender diversity.
The authors also find strong evidence that board independence mediates the association between disruptive technology usage and both inherent risk and control risk.
In addition, board size and gender exhibit distinct and differential mediating effects on the association and across the two types of risks.
Research limitations/implications The study reveals that the significant role of using disruptive technology by audit clients in reducing the risk of material misstatements is closely associated with the board of directors, which makes audit clients place greater emphasis on the construction of effective corporate governance.
Practical implications This study offers essential primary evidence that can assist policymakers and standard setters in formulating guidance and recommendations for board size, independence and gender quotas, ensuring the enhancement of effective governance and supporting the future of audit within the next generation of digital services.
Social implications With respect to relevant stakeholders, it is imperative for audit clients to recognise that corporate governance represents a fundamental means of addressing the ramifications of applying disruptive technology, particularly as they pertain to inherent and control risks within the audit client.
Originality/value This study contributes to the existing literature by investigating the joint impact of corporate governance and the utilisation of disruptive technology by audit clients on inherent risk and control risk, which has not been investigated by previous research.

Related Results

Material accounting misstatements: Do managerial overconfidence, financial distress, and corporate governance practices matter?
Material accounting misstatements: Do managerial overconfidence, financial distress, and corporate governance practices matter?
This study examined factors related to the occurrence of material accounting misstatements in Malaysian public listed companies (PLCs). Two factors, motivation and opportunity, wer...
MEDIATION AS A TOOL FOR ADDRESSING GAPS IN CIVIL LEGISLATION AMID ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION
MEDIATION AS A TOOL FOR ADDRESSING GAPS IN CIVIL LEGISLATION AMID ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION
In the contemporary context, the provision of legal support for innovative processes affecting the economic, political and social development of society is becoming increasingly si...
Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism in India: A Legal Review
Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism in India: A Legal Review
Mediation is emerging as a key alternative dispute resolution tool in India's legal landscape, providing a balance to the formalism of traditional litigation. In addition to high c...
Hubungan Kualitas Audit, Komite Audit, dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah terhadap Kinerja Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia
Hubungan Kualitas Audit, Komite Audit, dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah terhadap Kinerja Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia
ABSTRAK Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengetahui hubungan kualitas audit, komite audit, dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah (DPS) terhadap kinerja Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia pada tahun...
New Directions of Mediation Development in Ukraine
New Directions of Mediation Development in Ukraine
The rapid development of public relations in view of the spread of the new disease and acute crisis has an impact on all social institutions without exception. Mediation is no exce...
Chapter 4: Comparative Mediation Law Mapping Mediation Law with the Mediation Matrix
Chapter 4: Comparative Mediation Law Mapping Mediation Law with the Mediation Matrix
Mediation is the fastest-growing area of consensual dispute resolution  in terms of institutional and court programs and development of laws. Internationally, it is the su...
Gendered Employment Status and Payroll Misstatements: Evidence on Audit Effort from Sierra Leone
Gendered Employment Status and Payroll Misstatements: Evidence on Audit Effort from Sierra Leone
This study examines whether gendered employment status is associated with payroll misstatements and audit effort in Sierra Leone, a post-conflict emerging economy where women are d...
An Interactional Perspective on Interpreting as Mediation
An Interactional Perspective on Interpreting as Mediation
The importance of mediation in dialogue interpreting has been highlighted in a number of recent studies. Franz Pƶchhacker has outlined three analytical dimensions to look at interp...

Back to Top