Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A randomized, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) versus miltefosine in patients with post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis
View through CrossRef
Background:
Treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis cases is of paramount importance for kala-azar elimination; however, limited treatment regimens are available as of now.
Aim:
To compare the effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B vs miltefosine in post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis patients.
Methodology:
This was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group study. A total of 100 patients of post kala azar dermal leishmaniasis, aged between 5 and 65 years were recruited, 50 patients in each group A (liposomal amphotericin B) and B (miltefosine). Patients were randomized to receive either liposomal amphotericin B (30 mg/kg), six doses each 5 mg/kg, biweekly for 3 weeks or miltefosine 2.5 mg/kg or 100 mg/day for 12 weeks. All the patients were followed at 3rd, 6th and 12th months after the end of the treatment.
Results:
In the liposomal amphotericin B group, two patients were lost to follow-up, whereas four patients were lost to follow-up in the miltefosine group. The initial cure rate by “intention to treat analysis” was 98% and 100% in liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine group, respectively. The final cure rate by “per protocol analysis” was 74.5% and 86.9% in liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine, respectively. Twelve patients (25.5%) in the liposomal amphotericin B group and six patients (13%) in the miltefosine group relapsed. None of the patients in either group developed any serious adverse events.
Limitations:
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was not performed at all the follow-up visits and sample sizes.
Conclusion:
Efficacy of miltefosine was found to be better than liposomal amphotericin B, hence, the use of miltefosine as first-line therapy for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis needs to be continued. However, liposomal amphotericin B could be considered as one of the treatment options for the elimination of kala-azar from the Indian subcontinent.
Title: A randomized, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) versus miltefosine in patients with post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis
Description:
Background:
Treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis cases is of paramount importance for kala-azar elimination; however, limited treatment regimens are available as of now.
Aim:
To compare the effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B vs miltefosine in post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis patients.
Methodology:
This was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group study.
A total of 100 patients of post kala azar dermal leishmaniasis, aged between 5 and 65 years were recruited, 50 patients in each group A (liposomal amphotericin B) and B (miltefosine).
Patients were randomized to receive either liposomal amphotericin B (30 mg/kg), six doses each 5 mg/kg, biweekly for 3 weeks or miltefosine 2.
5 mg/kg or 100 mg/day for 12 weeks.
All the patients were followed at 3rd, 6th and 12th months after the end of the treatment.
Results:
In the liposomal amphotericin B group, two patients were lost to follow-up, whereas four patients were lost to follow-up in the miltefosine group.
The initial cure rate by “intention to treat analysis” was 98% and 100% in liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine group, respectively.
The final cure rate by “per protocol analysis” was 74.
5% and 86.
9% in liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine, respectively.
Twelve patients (25.
5%) in the liposomal amphotericin B group and six patients (13%) in the miltefosine group relapsed.
None of the patients in either group developed any serious adverse events.
Limitations:
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was not performed at all the follow-up visits and sample sizes.
Conclusion:
Efficacy of miltefosine was found to be better than liposomal amphotericin B, hence, the use of miltefosine as first-line therapy for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis needs to be continued.
However, liposomal amphotericin B could be considered as one of the treatment options for the elimination of kala-azar from the Indian subcontinent.
Related Results
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Target site bioanalysis and pharmacokinetics of antileishmanial drugs
Target site bioanalysis and pharmacokinetics of antileishmanial drugs
This thesis focuses on bioanalytical method development and validation of
antileishmanial drugs amphotericin B, miltefosine, and paromomycin in human
plasma and human skin tissue f...
Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity
Amphotericin B nephrotoxicity
Abstract
The use of amphotericin B limited by dose-dependent nephrotoxicity. Elevated creatinine associated with amphotericin B is not only a marker for renal dys...
SAT-LB309 Amphotericin B Induced Hypocalcemia in a Patient With Severe Hypercalcemia Due to Acute T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma
SAT-LB309 Amphotericin B Induced Hypocalcemia in a Patient With Severe Hypercalcemia Due to Acute T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma
Abstract
Adult T-cell Leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) is a rare and aggressive type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Patients with ATL commonly develop severe hypercalcemia leadin...
P79 Hypokalaemia—AmBisome versus Tillomed amphotericin
P79 Hypokalaemia—AmBisome versus Tillomed amphotericin
Abstract
Background
In December 2024, LTH transitioned from AmBisome to Tillomed amphotericin as part of a cost-saving in...
Liposomal amphotericin‐B (AmBisome)® treatment in solid organ and bone marrow transplant recipients. Efficacy and safety evaluation
Liposomal amphotericin‐B (AmBisome)® treatment in solid organ and bone marrow transplant recipients. Efficacy and safety evaluation
AbstractEight patients, 4 organ and 4 bone marrow transplant recipients, were treated with a liposomal amphotericin‐B formulation (AmBisome) in a compassionate basis program. Time ...
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
BackgroundA clinical dilemma exists in patients with CKD, ESKD, and after kidney transplantation, as they face concurrent risks of both thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications...
DRESS Syndrome Associated with Liposomal Amphotericin-B in a Kidney
Transplant Patient: A Case Report
DRESS Syndrome Associated with Liposomal Amphotericin-B in a Kidney
Transplant Patient: A Case Report
<p>Introduction: Liposomal amphotericin B is a widely used broad-spectrum antifungal
drug. It was developed to reduce nephrotoxicity and maximize the therapeutic utility of a...

