Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Analysis of e-cigarette warning letters issued by the Food and Drug Administration in 2020 and 2021

View through CrossRef
PurposeThis study analyses the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning letters sent to e-cigarette companies from 1 January 2020 to 9 September 2021. Study results can inform regulation of e-cigarettes.MethodologyWarning letters retrieved from FDA’s website were coded for company type (retailer, manufacturer or distributor), location (domestic or international), infractions listed (PMTA (premarket tobacco product application), selling to minors, advertising to youth or packaging violation/mislabelling), product type (e-liquid, device or both), flavour (fruit, candy, tobacco, menthol/mint, concept flavour) and consequence (civil money penalties, product seizure and injunction, product detention and refusal of entry to the USA, no-tobacco-sales order, criminal prosecution).ResultsOf 303 coded letters (126 from 2020 and 177 from 2021), 97.4% were sent to small online retailers. Overall, 94.1% of the companies cited were located within the USA, 75.2% of the infractions were identified by reviewing a company’s website and 70.5% were PMTA violations. In 2020, 55.6% of infractions were PMTA violations; in 2021, nearly all infractions were PMTA violations. The letters cited 880 products; 92.2% of which were e-liquid products, with 32.4% fruit and 31.1% concept flavours.DiscussionWarning letters targeted small online retailers rather than large e-cigarette brands or products most used by youth: pod mods and disposables. The focus of these enforcement actions comprises a small share of the market and the impact on use was likely minimal. With PMTA decisions pending for the largest brands of e-cigarettes, the FDA should use its enforcement powers to target manufacturers, distributors and sellers of the tobacco products that have the greatest impact on youth and products that provide no public health benefit.
Title: Analysis of e-cigarette warning letters issued by the Food and Drug Administration in 2020 and 2021
Description:
PurposeThis study analyses the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning letters sent to e-cigarette companies from 1 January 2020 to 9 September 2021.
Study results can inform regulation of e-cigarettes.
MethodologyWarning letters retrieved from FDA’s website were coded for company type (retailer, manufacturer or distributor), location (domestic or international), infractions listed (PMTA (premarket tobacco product application), selling to minors, advertising to youth or packaging violation/mislabelling), product type (e-liquid, device or both), flavour (fruit, candy, tobacco, menthol/mint, concept flavour) and consequence (civil money penalties, product seizure and injunction, product detention and refusal of entry to the USA, no-tobacco-sales order, criminal prosecution).
ResultsOf 303 coded letters (126 from 2020 and 177 from 2021), 97.
4% were sent to small online retailers.
Overall, 94.
1% of the companies cited were located within the USA, 75.
2% of the infractions were identified by reviewing a company’s website and 70.
5% were PMTA violations.
In 2020, 55.
6% of infractions were PMTA violations; in 2021, nearly all infractions were PMTA violations.
The letters cited 880 products; 92.
2% of which were e-liquid products, with 32.
4% fruit and 31.
1% concept flavours.
DiscussionWarning letters targeted small online retailers rather than large e-cigarette brands or products most used by youth: pod mods and disposables.
The focus of these enforcement actions comprises a small share of the market and the impact on use was likely minimal.
With PMTA decisions pending for the largest brands of e-cigarettes, the FDA should use its enforcement powers to target manufacturers, distributors and sellers of the tobacco products that have the greatest impact on youth and products that provide no public health benefit.

Related Results

P032 E-CIGARETTE AND CIGARETTE USE AMONG U.S. ADULT IBD PATIENTS: POPULATION-LEVEL SURVEY
P032 E-CIGARETTE AND CIGARETTE USE AMONG U.S. ADULT IBD PATIENTS: POPULATION-LEVEL SURVEY
Abstract Background Cigarette smoking can negatively affect treatment response in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, esp...
Cigarette Displays Around the School Area and Cigarette Sales in the School Area
Cigarette Displays Around the School Area and Cigarette Sales in the School Area
<div><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="left"><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><p><em>The tobacco industry continues to...
KECEMASAN SAAT PANDEMI COVID 19: LITERATUR REVIEW Hardiyati, Efri Widianti, Taty Hernawaty Departemen Keperawatan Jiwa Poltekkes Kemenkes Mamuju Sulbar, Universitas Pad...
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
BACKGROUND As of July 2020, a Web of Science search of “machine learning (ML)” nested within the search of “pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics” yielded over 100...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
The use of electronic cigarettes in Thailand: a cross-sectional national survey
The use of electronic cigarettes in Thailand: a cross-sectional national survey
Abstract Background An electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) is an electronic nicotine delivering system that may be widely used by...
A cross‐sectional analysis of electronic cigarette use in US adults by asthma status
A cross‐sectional analysis of electronic cigarette use in US adults by asthma status
AbstractObjectiveElectronic cigarette (e‐cigarette) use has been shown to worsen the asthma symptoms, but there is little information on current e‐cigarette use patterns in the gen...

Back to Top