Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Health Information and Administration: Standards and Evaluation of Healthcare Quality, Safety, and Person-Centered Care

View through CrossRef
Background: Healthcare quality is a multidimensional concept, defined by both clinical outcomes (safety, effectiveness) and person-centered experiences (dignity, communication). This dual identity of individuals as both "patients" and "customers" necessitates a management approach that integrates clinical excellence with service excellence. The evolution of quality management, from pioneers like Codman and Semmelweis to the adoption of industrial models from Shewhart and Deming, has provided the foundational tools for modern healthcare improvement. Aim: This article synthesizes the principles of healthcare quality management, aiming to outline its function, the standards that obligate it, and its clinical significance. It seeks to demonstrate how the disciplined application of quality methods can bridge the gap between administrative efficiency and ethical, person-centered care delivery. Methods: The paper is a comprehensive review that analyzes the function of quality management through iterative cycles like Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) and tools like Statistical Process Control (SPC). It examines the hierarchy of standards, from federal regulations and accrediting bodies like The Joint Commission to professional society guidelines and pay-for-performance incentives. Methods for evaluation, prioritization, and team-based improvement are detailed. Results: Robust quality management, when effectively implemented, leads to improved patient safety, enhanced clinical outcomes, and a better care experience. However, challenges persist, including data fragmentation, cultural resistance, and misaligned incentives, which can hinder improvement efforts. Success depends on leadership commitment, a supportive safety culture, and the active engagement of interdisciplinary teams. Conclusion: High-quality healthcare emerges from a system that seamlessly integrates rigorous standards, data-driven evaluation, and a person-centered ethos. Quality management is the essential engine for this integration, translating ethical obligations into reliable, safe, and valuable care through disciplined, iterative learning.
Title: Health Information and Administration: Standards and Evaluation of Healthcare Quality, Safety, and Person-Centered Care
Description:
Background: Healthcare quality is a multidimensional concept, defined by both clinical outcomes (safety, effectiveness) and person-centered experiences (dignity, communication).
This dual identity of individuals as both "patients" and "customers" necessitates a management approach that integrates clinical excellence with service excellence.
The evolution of quality management, from pioneers like Codman and Semmelweis to the adoption of industrial models from Shewhart and Deming, has provided the foundational tools for modern healthcare improvement.
Aim: This article synthesizes the principles of healthcare quality management, aiming to outline its function, the standards that obligate it, and its clinical significance.
It seeks to demonstrate how the disciplined application of quality methods can bridge the gap between administrative efficiency and ethical, person-centered care delivery.
Methods: The paper is a comprehensive review that analyzes the function of quality management through iterative cycles like Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) and tools like Statistical Process Control (SPC).
It examines the hierarchy of standards, from federal regulations and accrediting bodies like The Joint Commission to professional society guidelines and pay-for-performance incentives.
Methods for evaluation, prioritization, and team-based improvement are detailed.
Results: Robust quality management, when effectively implemented, leads to improved patient safety, enhanced clinical outcomes, and a better care experience.
However, challenges persist, including data fragmentation, cultural resistance, and misaligned incentives, which can hinder improvement efforts.
Success depends on leadership commitment, a supportive safety culture, and the active engagement of interdisciplinary teams.
Conclusion: High-quality healthcare emerges from a system that seamlessly integrates rigorous standards, data-driven evaluation, and a person-centered ethos.
Quality management is the essential engine for this integration, translating ethical obligations into reliable, safe, and valuable care through disciplined, iterative learning.

Related Results

Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
1 INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 5 -- 2 GENERAL BACKGROUND: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 7 -- 2.1 CHRONIC AND COMPLEX MENTAL DISORDERS: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE -- S...
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
Introduction     Road Traffic Injury (RTI) pose a significant health challenge. It represents the eighth leading cause of death globally, prompting the UN to designate 2011-2020 as...
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Abstract Introduction Telemedicine is the remote delivery of healthcare services using information and communication technologies and has gained global recognition as a solution to...
Advancing Nursing Practice to Forward Universal Health Care in the Philippines
Advancing Nursing Practice to Forward Universal Health Care in the Philippines
     The constantly changing healthcare landscape requires the health workforce to enhance their competencies and respond to the complex needs of the population they serve. In the ...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Modern approach to automation of internal control of quality and safety of medical care
Modern approach to automation of internal control of quality and safety of medical care
Introduction. Heads of medical organizations operating under the Moscow Healthcare Department are the ones who take care of internal control of quality and safety of medical care [...

Back to Top