Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

“Copyright, 1892, by Elizabeth S. Melville”: Rethinking the Field Formation of Melville Studies

View through CrossRef
Abstract This chapter focuses particular attention on what might be called the first Melville revival, beginning in 1892 when Elizabeth Shaw Melville returned four of Herman’s novels to print. The essay argues that a considerable amount of the literary labor that Elizabeth expended sits plainly in archival records, where nonetheless Melville scholars rarely find her. As this chapter is not, however, the first reconsideration of Elizabeth’s contributions to her husband’s career, the second half attempts to understand the ways that Melville scholarship over the past fifty years has perennially re-discovered Elizabeth and then, unable to assimilate the discovery, re-forgotten her. To break this cycle, the future of Melville studies may require a rethinking of what scholars designate by the organizing concept-metaphor “Melville”—a rethinking that might expand our scholarly object beyond the man himself to encompass, as well, scenes of collaboration in the family and agencies irreducible to the author’s own.
Title: “Copyright, 1892, by Elizabeth S. Melville”: Rethinking the Field Formation of Melville Studies
Description:
Abstract This chapter focuses particular attention on what might be called the first Melville revival, beginning in 1892 when Elizabeth Shaw Melville returned four of Herman’s novels to print.
The essay argues that a considerable amount of the literary labor that Elizabeth expended sits plainly in archival records, where nonetheless Melville scholars rarely find her.
As this chapter is not, however, the first reconsideration of Elizabeth’s contributions to her husband’s career, the second half attempts to understand the ways that Melville scholarship over the past fifty years has perennially re-discovered Elizabeth and then, unable to assimilate the discovery, re-forgotten her.
To break this cycle, the future of Melville studies may require a rethinking of what scholars designate by the organizing concept-metaphor “Melville”—a rethinking that might expand our scholarly object beyond the man himself to encompass, as well, scenes of collaboration in the family and agencies irreducible to the author’s own.

Related Results

Authorship in Croatian copyright legislation from 1846 to 2007
Authorship in Croatian copyright legislation from 1846 to 2007
The aim of this paper is to investigate and present concepts of the author and his/her copyright work in copyright legislation that entered into force in Croatia from 1846 to 2007....
Copyright's Paradox
Copyright's Paradox
Abstract Copyright is at once an engine of free expression and impediment to free expression. Copyright law underwrites much literature, journalism, music, art, and ...
Playing with Copyright
Playing with Copyright
Copyright education has become an important aspect of librarians’ information literacy and scholarly communications activities. These include providing support and delivering teach...
Copyright's Free Speech Burdens
Copyright's Free Speech Burdens
Abstract This chapter examines more precisely when and how copyright does—and does not—burden speech. We can divide copyright's speech burdens into three distinct, y...
Remaking Copyright in the First Amendment's Image
Remaking Copyright in the First Amendment's Image
Abstract Courts are not the only realm in which First Amendment values should come into play in defining and delimiting copyright. Concern over copyright's speech‐bu...
Foreing and domestic experience in protecting intellectual property right to jewelry and jewelry
Foreing and domestic experience in protecting intellectual property right to jewelry and jewelry
Key words: copyright, jewelry, bijouterie, unfair competition, trademark, litigation Fedorova N. Foreing and domestic experience in protecting intellectual property right to jewel...
Problematic on Copyright Execution as Fiduciary Collateral When Debtor Defaults
Problematic on Copyright Execution as Fiduciary Collateral When Debtor Defaults
The issuance of Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 24 of 2022 on Regulation of the Implementation of Law Number 24 of 2019 on creative economy has served as ...
Copyright law in the MOBA genre: a comparative analysis of DOTA2 and League of Legends
Copyright law in the MOBA genre: a comparative analysis of DOTA2 and League of Legends
Abstract The multiplayer online battle arena (MOBA) video game genre has been plagued with copyright infringement cases. Some of the copyright challenges that face this genre stem ...

Back to Top