Javascript must be enabled to continue!
295. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABDOMINAL FAT DISTRIBUTION AND PROGRESSION OF BARRETT’S ESOPHAGUS TO ADENOCARCINOMA
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Obesity was known to be a risk factor of the incidence of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and Barrett’s esophageal adenocarcinoma (BEA). Especially excessive visceral fat has recently reported to promote some cancers, including BEA. This study aimed to clarify the impact of abdominal fat distribution on the progression of BE to adenocarcinoma in long-segment BE (LSBE) and short-segment BE (SSBE).
Methods
Study 1: We retrospectively reviewed the 124 patients with pathologically defined superficial BEA who underwent endoscopic resection, including 4 endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and 85 endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or surgical operation (35 esophagectomy) in our institution between January 2004 and December 2018. 124 BEA cases included 34 LSBE (length ≥ 3 cm) cases and 90 SSBE (length ≥ 1 and < 3 cm) cases. Using computed tomography volumetry, we measured areas of visceral (VFA) and subcutaneous (SFA) fat at the level of the umbilicus, and calculated the VFA/SFA ratio in each patient, defining high-VFA/SFA ratio (≧1.0) and low-VFA/SFA ratio (<1.0). VFA/SFA ratio were compared and analyzed between BEA with LSBE group and BEA with SSBE group.
Study2: We divided 62 patients who had LSBE into two groups based on prognosis of BEA; BEA with LSBE (34 patients) and non-BEA with LSBE group (18 patients). Abovementioned parameters were compared and analyzed between these two groups.
Study3: Abovementioned parameters were compared and analyzed between BEA with SSBE (90 cases) and non-BEA with SSBE group (100 controls).
Results
study1: High VS ratio were seen in 22 (64.7%) patients among BEA with LSBE group and 34 (37.8%) patients among BEA with SSBE group, which is statistically significant (p = 0.0072).
Study2: High VS ratio were seen in 6 (33.3%) patients among non-BEA with LSBE group. This result was statistically significant compared to BEA with LSBE group (0.038).
Study3: In non-BEA with SSBE, 32 patients (32.0%) had High VS ratio, showing no significant difference compared to BEA with SSBE.
Conclusion
High VFA/SFA ratio was significantly associated with progression of long-segment Barrett’s esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Title: 295. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABDOMINAL FAT DISTRIBUTION AND PROGRESSION OF BARRETT’S ESOPHAGUS TO ADENOCARCINOMA
Description:
Abstract
Background
Obesity was known to be a risk factor of the incidence of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and Barrett’s esophageal adenocarcinoma (BEA).
Especially excessive visceral fat has recently reported to promote some cancers, including BEA.
This study aimed to clarify the impact of abdominal fat distribution on the progression of BE to adenocarcinoma in long-segment BE (LSBE) and short-segment BE (SSBE).
Methods
Study 1: We retrospectively reviewed the 124 patients with pathologically defined superficial BEA who underwent endoscopic resection, including 4 endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and 85 endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or surgical operation (35 esophagectomy) in our institution between January 2004 and December 2018.
124 BEA cases included 34 LSBE (length ≥ 3 cm) cases and 90 SSBE (length ≥ 1 and < 3 cm) cases.
Using computed tomography volumetry, we measured areas of visceral (VFA) and subcutaneous (SFA) fat at the level of the umbilicus, and calculated the VFA/SFA ratio in each patient, defining high-VFA/SFA ratio (≧1.
0) and low-VFA/SFA ratio (<1.
0).
VFA/SFA ratio were compared and analyzed between BEA with LSBE group and BEA with SSBE group.
Study2: We divided 62 patients who had LSBE into two groups based on prognosis of BEA; BEA with LSBE (34 patients) and non-BEA with LSBE group (18 patients).
Abovementioned parameters were compared and analyzed between these two groups.
Study3: Abovementioned parameters were compared and analyzed between BEA with SSBE (90 cases) and non-BEA with SSBE group (100 controls).
Results
study1: High VS ratio were seen in 22 (64.
7%) patients among BEA with LSBE group and 34 (37.
8%) patients among BEA with SSBE group, which is statistically significant (p = 0.
0072).
Study2: High VS ratio were seen in 6 (33.
3%) patients among non-BEA with LSBE group.
This result was statistically significant compared to BEA with LSBE group (0.
038).
Study3: In non-BEA with SSBE, 32 patients (32.
0%) had High VS ratio, showing no significant difference compared to BEA with SSBE.
Conclusion
High VFA/SFA ratio was significantly associated with progression of long-segment Barrett’s esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Related Results
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Adenocarcinoma and dysplasia in barrett`s esophagus: critical analysis of risk factors and of surveillance protocols
Adenocarcinoma and dysplasia in barrett`s esophagus: critical analysis of risk factors and of surveillance protocols
BACKGROUND: Identification of epidemiological risk factors in Barrett's esophagus resulting in dysplasia and adenocarcinoma and its impact on prevention and early detection.
AIMS: ...
[RETRACTED] Keto Extreme Fat Burner Tim Noakes v1
[RETRACTED] Keto Extreme Fat Burner Tim Noakes v1
[RETRACTED]Keto Extreme Fat Burner Denmark: Getting the perfect shape for the body is very important these days. The health and fitness of the body are directly connected to the sh...
[RETRACTED] Keto Extreme Fat Burner Tim Noakes v1
[RETRACTED] Keto Extreme Fat Burner Tim Noakes v1
[RETRACTED]Keto Extreme Fat Burner Denmark: Getting the perfect shape for the body is very important these days. The health and fitness of the body are directly connected to the sh...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Barrett Esophagus
Barrett Esophagus
Barrett esophagus is the condition in which normal stratified squamous epithelium of the esophagus is replaced by metaplastic columnar epithelium, which may predispose to developme...
Predictors for squamous re‐epithelialization of Barrett’s esophagus after endoscopic biopsy
Predictors for squamous re‐epithelialization of Barrett’s esophagus after endoscopic biopsy
AbstractBackground and Aim: Acid suppressive therapy has been reported to regress Barrett’s esophagus. However, it is still controversial as to whether all Barrett’s esophagus pat...

