Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

DOZ047.122: Inadequate response of atretic esophagus during acidic gastroesophageal reflux

View through CrossRef
Abstract Patients with atretic esophagus (OA) are candidates to severe gastroesophageal reflux. In a previous study, we observed that in OA operated children the complete transmission of contractions during the whole day and during acid reflux periods is poor compared to controls (C). Investigate the motor response of OA during periods of meal (M) and periods of acid reflux (GOR) in OA patients. Methods Prolonged monitoring of esophageal motor function recorded with three sensors: P1 above and P2, P3 below the suture, combined with pH-metry between P2 and P3. Number/min and amplitude of contractions and transmissions between P1-2-3 or P2-3 are compared during total time, meal and reflux periods and between OA with or without GOR. Population 13 operated patients (OA) mean age 7.75 years and 10 controls (C). Results Contractions/min in OA at P1 M = 1.4 SD 1.2 versus GOR = 0.8 SD 1.1: P < 0.05 at P2 M = 2.0 SD 1.4 versus GOR = 1.4 SD1.4: P < 0.05 at P3 M = 2.2 SD 1.3 versus GOR = 1.5 SD1.4: P < 0.05 Complete transmission (P1-2-3) in OA during M compared with total time (T) is increased (29 vs. 32%: P < 0.5), but not during GOR (29 vs. 28%: NS). No difference in distal transmission (P2-3) between C and OA during M (68.8 vs. 63.2) but difference during GOR (69.8 vs. 43 P < 0.01). Contractions/min are not different during M between 7/13 patients with normal (OAN) and 6/13 with abnormal (OAR) reflux index but differ during GOR: P2 OAN = 2.1 vs. P2 OAR = 0.6, P < 0.01; P3 OAN = 2.2 vs. OAR = 0.6, P < 0.05. Complete transmission (P1-2-3) in OAN is not different during M or GOR but different in OAR (M: 74.2 SD 33.5 vs. GOR 54.7 SD 30.5: P < 0.005); distal transmission (P2-3) is not different between OAN and OAR during M and RGO periods. Conclusion Esophageal motility remains impaired in the operated OA. GOR stimulations produce weaker responses than meals. In OAR alterations of response to GOR are more important in terms of decreased number of distal contractions and total transmission suggesting a motility disorder but also an altered sensitivity reducing primary peristaltic response to reflux.
Title: DOZ047.122: Inadequate response of atretic esophagus during acidic gastroesophageal reflux
Description:
Abstract Patients with atretic esophagus (OA) are candidates to severe gastroesophageal reflux.
In a previous study, we observed that in OA operated children the complete transmission of contractions during the whole day and during acid reflux periods is poor compared to controls (C).
Investigate the motor response of OA during periods of meal (M) and periods of acid reflux (GOR) in OA patients.
Methods Prolonged monitoring of esophageal motor function recorded with three sensors: P1 above and P2, P3 below the suture, combined with pH-metry between P2 and P3.
Number/min and amplitude of contractions and transmissions between P1-2-3 or P2-3 are compared during total time, meal and reflux periods and between OA with or without GOR.
Population 13 operated patients (OA) mean age 7.
75 years and 10 controls (C).
Results Contractions/min in OA at P1 M = 1.
4 SD 1.
2 versus GOR = 0.
8 SD 1.
1: P < 0.
05 at P2 M = 2.
0 SD 1.
4 versus GOR = 1.
4 SD1.
4: P < 0.
05 at P3 M = 2.
2 SD 1.
3 versus GOR = 1.
5 SD1.
4: P < 0.
05 Complete transmission (P1-2-3) in OA during M compared with total time (T) is increased (29 vs.
32%: P < 0.
5), but not during GOR (29 vs.
28%: NS).
No difference in distal transmission (P2-3) between C and OA during M (68.
8 vs.
63.
2) but difference during GOR (69.
8 vs.
43 P < 0.
01).
Contractions/min are not different during M between 7/13 patients with normal (OAN) and 6/13 with abnormal (OAR) reflux index but differ during GOR: P2 OAN = 2.
1 vs.
P2 OAR = 0.
6, P < 0.
01; P3 OAN = 2.
2 vs.
OAR = 0.
6, P < 0.
05.
Complete transmission (P1-2-3) in OAN is not different during M or GOR but different in OAR (M: 74.
2 SD 33.
5 vs.
GOR 54.
7 SD 30.
5: P < 0.
005); distal transmission (P2-3) is not different between OAN and OAR during M and RGO periods.
Conclusion Esophageal motility remains impaired in the operated OA.
GOR stimulations produce weaker responses than meals.
In OAR alterations of response to GOR are more important in terms of decreased number of distal contractions and total transmission suggesting a motility disorder but also an altered sensitivity reducing primary peristaltic response to reflux.

Related Results

Gastroesophageal Reflux Caused Pharyngitis in Local Population A Comparative Clinical Study
Gastroesophageal Reflux Caused Pharyngitis in Local Population A Comparative Clinical Study
Objective: In gastroesophageal reflux disease gastric contents caused erosive action in esophagus as well as in upper respiratory chamber which is a very common and painful medical...
Abstract 5077: Proteomic profiling reveals chemopreventive targets in esophageal adenocarcinoma
Abstract 5077: Proteomic profiling reveals chemopreventive targets in esophageal adenocarcinoma
Abstract Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is characterized by rising incidence rates and high mortality due to late stage diagnosis and a lack of efficacious options ...
The role of psychological distress in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients: a prospective questionnaire study
The role of psychological distress in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients: a prospective questionnaire study
Clin. Otolaryngol. 2010, 35, 25–30.Objectives:  To determine the role of psychological distress in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients and evaluate the correlation between symptoms, ...
429. BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS IN CHILDREN
429. BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS IN CHILDREN
Abstract Background In children, Barrett's esophagus (BE) is much less common than in adults and has its own characteristics. If...
Barrett Esophagus
Barrett Esophagus
Barrett esophagus is the condition in which normal stratified squamous epithelium of the esophagus is replaced by metaplastic columnar epithelium, which may predispose to developme...
Is It Barrett's Esophagus or Gastric Heterotopia
Is It Barrett's Esophagus or Gastric Heterotopia
Columnar epithelium in the distal part of the esophagus is generally related to Barrett's esophagus. Barrett's esophagus is a well-known premalignant lesion for adenocarcinoma of t...
Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus. Pathophysiology, classification and treatment. Review
Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus. Pathophysiology, classification and treatment. Review
Introduction: The pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease is reviewed as well as the classification of Barret's esophagus. Several therapeutic perspectives are addressed...
Abstracts for the 6th European Symposium on Gastrointestinal Motility 19–21 NOVEMBER 1992 HOTEL MELIA BARCELONA, BARCELONA, SPAIN
Abstracts for the 6th European Symposium on Gastrointestinal Motility 19–21 NOVEMBER 1992 HOTEL MELIA BARCELONA, BARCELONA, SPAIN
MOTOR RESPONSES OF HUMAN ILEUM TO TACHYKININS IN VITRO: EXISTENCE OF NK2 RECEPTORS AND RECEPTORS SPECIFIC FOR NEUROPEPTIDE GAMMA.INNERVATION OF THE MUSCULARIS MUCOSAE OF HUMAN COLO...

Back to Top