Javascript must be enabled to continue!
‘Scottish Control of Scottish Affairs’: 1945–1964
View through CrossRef
Following the Second World War, Scottish Unionists and their allies in Parliament slowly began to assume a more consistently mainstream position within the emerging Scottish political system. Intriguingly, they did so partly by framing that system along ‘nationalist’ lines, criticising the Labour government at Westminster on the basis that it did not understand Scottish sentiment and sought to rob Scotland of autonomous institutions through its nationalisation agenda. This ‘Scottish Control of Scottish Affairs’ agenda formed part of the broader Conservative Party ‘territorial code’, which championed decentralisation and unity through diversity. Yet while there were electoral rewards to be gained from this ‘nationalist unionist’ strategy, particularly at the general election of 1955, it also proved better suited to opposition than to office. Back in government after 1951, the Unionists in Scotland found themselves vulnerable to the same charge they had levelled against Labour: that the party neglected peculiar Scottish grievances. Why was legislative devolution good enough for Northern Ireland (Stormont) but not Scotland? This chapter will examine Scottish Unionism’s high watermark – 1955 – and its subsequent decline. The standard explanations for this change in fortunes, Imperial decline and a shifting economic backdrop, will also be prosecuted. Broader changes in Scottish society will also be analysed in order to contextualise shifting support for the party. Why did an individualist political appeal no longer resonate as strongly by the late 1950s as it once had?
Edinburgh University Press
Title: ‘Scottish Control of Scottish Affairs’: 1945–1964
Description:
Following the Second World War, Scottish Unionists and their allies in Parliament slowly began to assume a more consistently mainstream position within the emerging Scottish political system.
Intriguingly, they did so partly by framing that system along ‘nationalist’ lines, criticising the Labour government at Westminster on the basis that it did not understand Scottish sentiment and sought to rob Scotland of autonomous institutions through its nationalisation agenda.
This ‘Scottish Control of Scottish Affairs’ agenda formed part of the broader Conservative Party ‘territorial code’, which championed decentralisation and unity through diversity.
Yet while there were electoral rewards to be gained from this ‘nationalist unionist’ strategy, particularly at the general election of 1955, it also proved better suited to opposition than to office.
Back in government after 1951, the Unionists in Scotland found themselves vulnerable to the same charge they had levelled against Labour: that the party neglected peculiar Scottish grievances.
Why was legislative devolution good enough for Northern Ireland (Stormont) but not Scotland? This chapter will examine Scottish Unionism’s high watermark – 1955 – and its subsequent decline.
The standard explanations for this change in fortunes, Imperial decline and a shifting economic backdrop, will also be prosecuted.
Broader changes in Scottish society will also be analysed in order to contextualise shifting support for the party.
Why did an individualist political appeal no longer resonate as strongly by the late 1950s as it once had?.
Related Results
‘Scottish Control of Scottish Affairs’
‘Scottish Control of Scottish Affairs’
This chapter continues its analysis of Scottish Conservative ‘nationalist unionism’ by tracing the evolution of the party’s more ostentatiously nationalist ‘Scottish Control of Sco...
Creating a public affairs function in countries without a public affairs culture
Creating a public affairs function in countries without a public affairs culture
As economies become more international and inter‐related, company executives must pursue corporate objectives in environments very different from their own and often in countries t...
The Theology of the Scottish Protestant Missionary Movement
The Theology of the Scottish Protestant Missionary Movement
In any survey of influential British missionary thinkers, Scottish names would occupy a prominent place. The Scottish contribution was not confined to those who served with the mis...
Congress and the Reconstruction of Foreign Affairs Federalism
Congress and the Reconstruction of Foreign Affairs Federalism
Though the Constitution conspicuously bars some state involvement in foreign affairs, the states clearly retain some authority in foreign affairs. Correctly supposing that state pa...
SCOTTISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE: FROM HUGH MACDIARMID TO TOM LEONARD, EDWIN MORGAN AND JAMES ROBERTSON
SCOTTISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE: FROM HUGH MACDIARMID TO TOM LEONARD, EDWIN MORGAN AND JAMES ROBERTSON
The paper deals with the Scottish literary revival that occurred in the 1920s and 1930s. The leading theoretical and artistic figure of this movement was Hugh MacDiarmid, a Scottis...
“Yearbook of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs” as a Source on the History of Russian Diplomacy
“Yearbook of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs” as a Source on the History of Russian Diplomacy
For political and informational purposes, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Empire intensified its publishing activities in the 1860s. One of the important projects wa...
TOPICAL PROBLEMS OF ACTIVITIES OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS BODIES
TOPICAL PROBLEMS OF ACTIVITIES OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS BODIES
The relevance of the issues studied in this article is due to the importance of the policy pursued in the Russian Federation in connection with the provision of State, public, envi...
Buchbesprechungen
Buchbesprechungen
Allgemeines
Das ist Militärgeschichte! Probleme - Projekte - Perspektiven. Hrsg. mit Unterstützung des MGFA von Christian Th. Müller und Matthias Rogg
...

