Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Modern Philosopher Kings
View through CrossRef
The conclusion shows how the detailed exploration of paradox and promise of the philosopher king in modernity reveals valuable insights into the relationship between wisdom and power. It outlines how ambitious attempts to instantiate modern philosopher kings have met significant obstacles, indicating that though politics is open to wisdom and philosophy, there are also powerful elements within it resistant to such a union. Though each case study has revealed the success and specific forms of such resistance, the overarching factors that appear to limit the philosopher king are the brevity of a wise person’s life, the unpredictability of chance, and the very constitution of humanity, where a few are philosophical, while most are moved by a diversity of interests derived or shaped largely by a powerful sense of dignity and concern with physical welfare. The chapter then explores whether it may be possible to address these limitations through other means. It suggests that philosophers as authors, where writing is a form of political rule, either in foundational philosophical works or in the enactment of laws and constitutions that defend and accommodate wisdom, provides the more long-lasting means for securing modern philosopher kings.
Title: Modern Philosopher Kings
Description:
The conclusion shows how the detailed exploration of paradox and promise of the philosopher king in modernity reveals valuable insights into the relationship between wisdom and power.
It outlines how ambitious attempts to instantiate modern philosopher kings have met significant obstacles, indicating that though politics is open to wisdom and philosophy, there are also powerful elements within it resistant to such a union.
Though each case study has revealed the success and specific forms of such resistance, the overarching factors that appear to limit the philosopher king are the brevity of a wise person’s life, the unpredictability of chance, and the very constitution of humanity, where a few are philosophical, while most are moved by a diversity of interests derived or shaped largely by a powerful sense of dignity and concern with physical welfare.
The chapter then explores whether it may be possible to address these limitations through other means.
It suggests that philosophers as authors, where writing is a form of political rule, either in foundational philosophical works or in the enactment of laws and constitutions that defend and accommodate wisdom, provides the more long-lasting means for securing modern philosopher kings.
Related Results
The Wise and Sovereign People
The Wise and Sovereign People
In its dispersal of offices and power or accusations of elitism, democracy appears as anti-intellectual and therefore a formidable obstacle to modern philosopher kings. But can dem...
The Language of the Books of Kings
The Language of the Books of Kings
Abstract
A major topic of discussion in recent scholarship on the books of Kings is whether the language of Kings can be used in tracing the diachronic development o...
Kings’ Sagas
Kings’ Sagas
The Norse-Icelandic kings’ sagas originated in the 12th century, reached their zenith in the 13th century, and then kept being amplified and rewritten into new compilations through...
Harry Potter, Inc.
Harry Potter, Inc.
Engagement in any capacity with mainstream media since mid-2001 has meant immersion in the cross-platform, multimedia phenomenon of Harry Potter: Muggle outcast; boy wizard; corpor...
The Hidden Philosopher King
The Hidden Philosopher King
The Capuchin Lecler du Tremblay, counsellor to Cardinal de Richerlieu was referred to as the éminence grise. Is a philosopher who advises or counsels kings a modern answer to the p...
The Books of Kings and Chronicles
The Books of Kings and Chronicles
Abstract
The book of Chronicles contains material found in the Torah and Former Prophets. The most significant overlapping material is with Kings. The exact version ...
Albert Camus
Albert Camus
The identity of Albert Camus (b. 1913–d. 1960) as a philosopher is ambiguous, and his own relation to philosophy was ambivalent. He hesitated to identify as a philosopher, and foll...
The Public Intellectual
The Public Intellectual
The intellectual as someone who ‘speaks truth to power’ and therefore lacks power does not initially seem to accord with the philosopher king who combines both. Yet as this chapter...

