Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Ratings Game: Demographic and Practice Factors Affecting Yelp Ratings of Plastic Surgeons

View through CrossRef
Background: Review platforms such as Yelp are increasingly used by patients establishing care and may contain substantial information regarding patient preferences and potential biases. The authors’ aims were to (1) analyze patient satisfaction through identifying factors associated with positive and negative patient reviews for plastic surgery providers across the United States, and (2) investigate the association between overall rating and different physician and practice factors based on gender and race. Methods: Reviews of plastic surgery provider practices from cities across seven different regions within the United States were obtained from Yelp. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed. Chi-square tests were used to determine whether race or sex was associated with overall rating (of five stars) and qualitative themes. Results: A total of 5210 reviews met inclusion criteria; 80.3% received a five-star rating and 13.5% received a one-star rating. Positive Yelp reviews and higher ratings were associated with positive comments regarding surgical and injectable outcomes, physical examination, communication, competency/knowledge base, temperament, scheduling, and staff interactions. When the following factors were mentioned negatively, the practice was more likely to receive a lower rating: temperament, communication, cost consciousness, surgical and injectable outcomes, physical examination, billing/insurance, scheduling, interactions with staff, and wait times. No association was identified in terms of overall physician rating based on sex or race; however, there were differences noted in distribution of positive and negative themes. Conclusions: Patient reviews on Yelp indicate that several physician and practice factors influence patient satisfaction. The themes reported in this study may be used by plastic surgery providers to identify areas for practice improvement to enhance the overall patient experience.
Title: The Ratings Game: Demographic and Practice Factors Affecting Yelp Ratings of Plastic Surgeons
Description:
Background: Review platforms such as Yelp are increasingly used by patients establishing care and may contain substantial information regarding patient preferences and potential biases.
The authors’ aims were to (1) analyze patient satisfaction through identifying factors associated with positive and negative patient reviews for plastic surgery providers across the United States, and (2) investigate the association between overall rating and different physician and practice factors based on gender and race.
Methods: Reviews of plastic surgery provider practices from cities across seven different regions within the United States were obtained from Yelp.
Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed.
Chi-square tests were used to determine whether race or sex was associated with overall rating (of five stars) and qualitative themes.
Results: A total of 5210 reviews met inclusion criteria; 80.
3% received a five-star rating and 13.
5% received a one-star rating.
Positive Yelp reviews and higher ratings were associated with positive comments regarding surgical and injectable outcomes, physical examination, communication, competency/knowledge base, temperament, scheduling, and staff interactions.
When the following factors were mentioned negatively, the practice was more likely to receive a lower rating: temperament, communication, cost consciousness, surgical and injectable outcomes, physical examination, billing/insurance, scheduling, interactions with staff, and wait times.
No association was identified in terms of overall physician rating based on sex or race; however, there were differences noted in distribution of positive and negative themes.
Conclusions: Patient reviews on Yelp indicate that several physician and practice factors influence patient satisfaction.
The themes reported in this study may be used by plastic surgery providers to identify areas for practice improvement to enhance the overall patient experience.

Related Results

Schule und Spiel – mehr als reine Wissensvermittlung
Schule und Spiel – mehr als reine Wissensvermittlung
Die öffentliche Schule Quest to learn in New York City ist eine Modell-Schule, die in ihren Lehrmethoden auf spielbasiertes Lernen, Game Design und den Game Design Prozess setzt. I...
Divergent Conceptualizations and Management Strategies for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Qualitative Multispecialty Study
Divergent Conceptualizations and Management Strategies for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Qualitative Multispecialty Study
Abstract Background Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) is the most prevalent subtype of thoracic outlet syndrome and remains one of the most controversial conditions in per...
Game Theory in Business Ethics: Bad Ideology or Bad Press?
Game Theory in Business Ethics: Bad Ideology or Bad Press?
Solomon’s article and Binmore’s response exemplify a standard exchange between the game theorist and those critical of applying game theory to ethics. The critic of game theory lis...
Perancangan Ulang Game Edukasi Bahasa Inggris menggunakan Digital Game Based Learning Method
Perancangan Ulang Game Edukasi Bahasa Inggris menggunakan Digital Game Based Learning Method
Game edukasi adalah game yang didesain untuk merangsang kecerdasan anak. Game edukasi bertujuan untuk belajar dan menarik perhatian siswa. Game edukasi adalah gabungan dari konten ...
Work-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries in Plastic Surgeons in the United States, Canada, and Norway
Work-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries in Plastic Surgeons in the United States, Canada, and Norway
Background: Musculoskeletal injuries are more common among surgeons than among the general population. However, little is known about these types of injuries among plas...
Vitreoretinal surgeons’ experience and time interval from pars-plana vitrectomy to cataract extraction
Vitreoretinal surgeons’ experience and time interval from pars-plana vitrectomy to cataract extraction
AIM: To identify the association of the vitreoretinal surgeons’ experience with the time interval between pars-plana vitrectomy (PPV) and cataract extraction (CE). METHODS: Eyes wi...
QS3: The Ideal Match: Optimizing Partial Face Transplants In Terms Of Skin Tone Discrepancies
QS3: The Ideal Match: Optimizing Partial Face Transplants In Terms Of Skin Tone Discrepancies
Background: Partial face composite allotransplantation poses a unique aesthetic challenge. Namely, partial face transplants need to resemble the patient’s native skin. The degree o...
Competencia y colusión en el juego de Hotelling
Competencia y colusión en el juego de Hotelling
This doctoral thesis belongs to the field of science called Game Theory and, specifically, addresses the analysis of Hotelling's game. In the model defined by Harold Hotelling (189...

Back to Top