Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Human Evolution

View through CrossRef
The study of human evolution involves (1) understanding the evolutionary context and the circumstances surrounding the origin of the branch of the Tree of Life, technically referred to as a clade, whose only extant taxon is modern humans; (2) recognizing the extinct species that are more closely related to modern humans than to the closest living apes (i.e., chimpanzees and bonobos); (3) reconstructing the morphology and behavior of those species; (4) determining how they are related to each other and to modern humans; (5) investigating the factors and influences that shaped their evolution; and (6) reconstructing the origin(s) of modern human anatomy and behavior. The study of the fossil evidence for human evolution is traditionally referred to as hominid paleontology, which reflected the then-prevailing conventional wisdom that the differences between modern humans and the great apes were profound enough to merit being recognized at the level of the family, with modern humans in the family Hominidae (a.k.a. hominids), and the great apes in the family Pongidae (a.k.a. pongids). But the molecular evidence is consistent with a particularly close relationship between Homo sapiens (the formal Linnaean name for modern humans) and two of the great apes, chimpanzees and bonobos. In the light of this compelling evidence, many researchers use the tribe (the taxonomic category below the level of the family and above the level of the genus) Hominini to accommodate the species and genera more closely related to modern humans than to chimpanzees and bonobos. So, in the new terminology the study of the human fossil record should be referred to as hominin paleontology. The study of the artifacts (e.g., stone and bone tools, drawn and carved images, early structures, evidence of decoration, etc.) made in prehistoric times is called prehistoric archaeology. In the United States of America, the combined study of hominin paleontology and prehistoric archaeology is called paleoanthropology, human prehistory, or just prehistory—this article focuses on hominin paleontology. The data available for reconstructing human evolutionary history come from molecules (from DNA and proteins), the phenotype, from true fossils (i.e., bones and teeth), and from trace fossils (i.e., footprint trails and natural endocasts). Genetic data include information about modern-human genetic variation that allows researchers to reconstruct the relatively recent migration of modern humans, plus ancient DNA that so far has been recovered from modern humans, Neanderthals, Denisovans, and the fossils from a 430-thousand-year-old site in Spain called the Sima de los Huesos. Phenotypic evidence, which is divided into macroscopic, microscopic, and molecular, can be gathered from the surface of true fossils (i.e., bones and teeth) as well as from their internal structure and their proteome. The internal structure of true fossils can be accessed nondestructively by using imaging techniques or destructively by making sections of bones and teeth. The trace fossils that are most relevant for human evolution are footprints such as the c. 3.6-million-year-old hominin footprint trails from Laetoli in Tanzania, and natural endocasts that provide information about the size and shape of the brain.
Title: Human Evolution
Description:
The study of human evolution involves (1) understanding the evolutionary context and the circumstances surrounding the origin of the branch of the Tree of Life, technically referred to as a clade, whose only extant taxon is modern humans; (2) recognizing the extinct species that are more closely related to modern humans than to the closest living apes (i.
e.
, chimpanzees and bonobos); (3) reconstructing the morphology and behavior of those species; (4) determining how they are related to each other and to modern humans; (5) investigating the factors and influences that shaped their evolution; and (6) reconstructing the origin(s) of modern human anatomy and behavior.
The study of the fossil evidence for human evolution is traditionally referred to as hominid paleontology, which reflected the then-prevailing conventional wisdom that the differences between modern humans and the great apes were profound enough to merit being recognized at the level of the family, with modern humans in the family Hominidae (a.
k.
a.
hominids), and the great apes in the family Pongidae (a.
k.
a.
pongids).
But the molecular evidence is consistent with a particularly close relationship between Homo sapiens (the formal Linnaean name for modern humans) and two of the great apes, chimpanzees and bonobos.
In the light of this compelling evidence, many researchers use the tribe (the taxonomic category below the level of the family and above the level of the genus) Hominini to accommodate the species and genera more closely related to modern humans than to chimpanzees and bonobos.
So, in the new terminology the study of the human fossil record should be referred to as hominin paleontology.
The study of the artifacts (e.
g.
, stone and bone tools, drawn and carved images, early structures, evidence of decoration, etc.
) made in prehistoric times is called prehistoric archaeology.
In the United States of America, the combined study of hominin paleontology and prehistoric archaeology is called paleoanthropology, human prehistory, or just prehistory—this article focuses on hominin paleontology.
The data available for reconstructing human evolutionary history come from molecules (from DNA and proteins), the phenotype, from true fossils (i.
e.
, bones and teeth), and from trace fossils (i.
e.
, footprint trails and natural endocasts).
Genetic data include information about modern-human genetic variation that allows researchers to reconstruct the relatively recent migration of modern humans, plus ancient DNA that so far has been recovered from modern humans, Neanderthals, Denisovans, and the fossils from a 430-thousand-year-old site in Spain called the Sima de los Huesos.
Phenotypic evidence, which is divided into macroscopic, microscopic, and molecular, can be gathered from the surface of true fossils (i.
e.
, bones and teeth) as well as from their internal structure and their proteome.
The internal structure of true fossils can be accessed nondestructively by using imaging techniques or destructively by making sections of bones and teeth.
The trace fossils that are most relevant for human evolution are footprints such as the c.
 3.
6-million-year-old hominin footprint trails from Laetoli in Tanzania, and natural endocasts that provide information about the size and shape of the brain.

Related Results

Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash ABSTRACT Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Brain Organoids, the Path Forward?
Photo by Maxim Berg on Unsplash INTRODUCTION The brain is one of the most foundational parts of being human, and we are still learning about what makes humans unique. Advancements ...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution
Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution
Abstract The capacity to symbolize (symbolization) and the use of symbols (symbolism) are fundamental to every aspect of human life. The Oxford Handbook of Human Sym...
The Sacred Chain: How Understanding Evolution Leads to Deeper Faith
The Sacred Chain: How Understanding Evolution Leads to Deeper Faith
THE SACRED CHAIN: How Understanding Evolution Leads to Deeper Faith by Jim Stump. HarperOne, 2024. 261 pages. Hardcover; $29.99. ISBN: 9780063350946. *Jim Stump has served as the h...
Evolution and the cell
Evolution and the cell
Genotype to phenotype, and back again Evolution is intimately linked to biology at the cellular scale- evolutionary processes act on the very genetic material that is carried and ...
Modelling surface evolution in abrasive jet micromachining using level set methods
Modelling surface evolution in abrasive jet micromachining using level set methods
The time dependent surface evolution in abrasive jet micromachining (AJM) is described by a partial differential equation which is difficult to solve using analytical or traditiona...
Old-Earth or Evolutionary Creation? Discussing Origins with Reasons to Believe and BioLogos
Old-Earth or Evolutionary Creation? Discussing Origins with Reasons to Believe and BioLogos
OLD-EARTH OR EVOLUTIONARY CREATION? Discussing Origins with Reasons to Believe and Bio-Logos by Kenneth Keathley, J. B. Stump, and Joe Aguirre, eds. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity...

Back to Top