Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Birth of the Dead Constitution: Arthur Machen Jr.’s Early Twentieth-Century Originalism
View through CrossRef
In 1900, Baltimore attorney Arthur Machen Jr. wrote an article for the Harvard Law Review rejecting a “living” Constitution and arguing that the Constitution should be interpreted according to “the intent of the framers.” Though some scholars have recognized this surprisingly early articulation of constitutional originalism, this article analyzes Machen’s originalism in light of the constitutional politics he pursued and his intellectual influence on the later rise of originalism within American conservatism. Specifically, Machen claimed originalism for its utility in rolling back elements of Reconstruction and defending against the proposed changes of Progressives and their living constitutionalism. For roughly a decade after its publication, he sought to overturn the Fifteenth Amendment and Black suffrage, claiming the constitutional text of the Founding trumped the intent of Reconstruction. Later, he turned his originalist ire on Prohibition and the Eighteenth Amendment and then the New Deal. Among those persuaded by Machen’s originalism was his brother, J. Gresham, a leading fundamentalist theologian whose students adopted their mentor’s constitutional politics as they became leading figures in the New Christian Right of the later twentieth century. Through his brother, Arthur set the stage for an evangelical mass movement whose grievances against legal liberalism encouraged the official adoption of originalism by the Reagan Department of Justice under Attorney General Edwin Meese in the 1980s. Recovering this long history of constitutional originalism reveals that many of its features were present in the early twentieth century, such as: its reliance on a sacralized American Founding, its resistance to democratization, its connection with fundamentalist Protestant biblical literalism, its argumentative malleability, and its utility for a range of conservative political ends. Ultimately, the “dead” Constitution can only be understood in the context of its evolution from an early twentieth-century birth.
Title: The Birth of the Dead Constitution: Arthur Machen Jr.’s Early Twentieth-Century Originalism
Description:
In 1900, Baltimore attorney Arthur Machen Jr.
wrote an article for the Harvard Law Review rejecting a “living” Constitution and arguing that the Constitution should be interpreted according to “the intent of the framers.
” Though some scholars have recognized this surprisingly early articulation of constitutional originalism, this article analyzes Machen’s originalism in light of the constitutional politics he pursued and his intellectual influence on the later rise of originalism within American conservatism.
Specifically, Machen claimed originalism for its utility in rolling back elements of Reconstruction and defending against the proposed changes of Progressives and their living constitutionalism.
For roughly a decade after its publication, he sought to overturn the Fifteenth Amendment and Black suffrage, claiming the constitutional text of the Founding trumped the intent of Reconstruction.
Later, he turned his originalist ire on Prohibition and the Eighteenth Amendment and then the New Deal.
Among those persuaded by Machen’s originalism was his brother, J.
Gresham, a leading fundamentalist theologian whose students adopted their mentor’s constitutional politics as they became leading figures in the New Christian Right of the later twentieth century.
Through his brother, Arthur set the stage for an evangelical mass movement whose grievances against legal liberalism encouraged the official adoption of originalism by the Reagan Department of Justice under Attorney General Edwin Meese in the 1980s.
Recovering this long history of constitutional originalism reveals that many of its features were present in the early twentieth century, such as: its reliance on a sacralized American Founding, its resistance to democratization, its connection with fundamentalist Protestant biblical literalism, its argumentative malleability, and its utility for a range of conservative political ends.
Ultimately, the “dead” Constitution can only be understood in the context of its evolution from an early twentieth-century birth.
Related Results
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com
Abstract
Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Introduction
Introduction
Abstract
The Introduction reveals that all constitutional interpretation rests on unwritten ideas, and that debates about these unwritten ideas are the real source o...
A Plea for Doubt in the Subjectivity of Method
A Plea for Doubt in the Subjectivity of Method
Photograph by Gonzalo Echeverria (2010)Doubt has been my closest companion for several years as I struggle to make sense of certain hidden events from within my family’s hist...
SHARIAH’S POSITION IN AFGHAN 2004 CONSTITUTION: A LEGAL ANALYSIS
SHARIAH’S POSITION IN AFGHAN 2004 CONSTITUTION: A LEGAL ANALYSIS
The legal position of Shariah in the 2004 Afghan constitution has been considerably debated due to the full involvement of the international community in the constitution-making pr...
Short birth interval predicts the risk of preterm birth among pregnant women in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Short birth interval predicts the risk of preterm birth among pregnant women in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: World health organization recommends that women wait at least 2 years after a live birth to reduce the risk of adverse birth outcomes, like preterm bir...
Exploring Women's Values, Choices, Expectations, and Outcomes for Birth After Cesarean
Exploring Women's Values, Choices, Expectations, and Outcomes for Birth After Cesarean
Purpose/AimTo explore women's values and expectations about birth after cesarean during decision making to better inform the design of strategies to support women to achieve consis...
UK Constitution: Should it be Codified
UK Constitution: Should it be Codified
A Constitution is a vital part of a State, as it encompasses the fundamental principles and rules upon which a state exists. Considering the Constitution of the United Kingdom (UK)...

