Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Birth of the Dead Constitution: Arthur Machen Jr.’s Early Twentieth-Century Originalism

View through CrossRef
In 1900, Baltimore attorney Arthur Machen Jr. wrote an article for the Harvard Law Review rejecting a “living” Constitution and arguing that the Constitution should be interpreted according to “the intent of the framers.” Though some scholars have recognized this surprisingly early articulation of constitutional originalism, this article analyzes Machen’s originalism in light of the constitutional politics he pursued and his intellectual influence on the later rise of originalism within American conservatism. Specifically, Machen claimed originalism for its utility in rolling back elements of Reconstruction and defending against the proposed changes of Progressives and their living constitutionalism. For roughly a decade after its publication, he sought to overturn the Fifteenth Amendment and Black suffrage, claiming the constitutional text of the Founding trumped the intent of Reconstruction. Later, he turned his originalist ire on Prohibition and the Eighteenth Amendment and then the New Deal. Among those persuaded by Machen’s originalism was his brother, J. Gresham, a leading fundamentalist theologian whose students adopted their mentor’s constitutional politics as they became leading figures in the New Christian Right of the later twentieth century. Through his brother, Arthur set the stage for an evangelical mass movement whose grievances against legal liberalism encouraged the official adoption of originalism by the Reagan Department of Justice under Attorney General Edwin Meese in the 1980s. Recovering this long history of constitutional originalism reveals that many of its features were present in the early twentieth century, such as: its reliance on a sacralized American Founding, its resistance to democratization, its connection with fundamentalist Protestant biblical literalism, its argumentative malleability, and its utility for a range of conservative political ends. Ultimately, the “dead” Constitution can only be understood in the context of its evolution from an early twentieth-century birth.
Title: The Birth of the Dead Constitution: Arthur Machen Jr.’s Early Twentieth-Century Originalism
Description:
In 1900, Baltimore attorney Arthur Machen Jr.
wrote an article for the Harvard Law Review rejecting a “living” Constitution and arguing that the Constitution should be interpreted according to “the intent of the framers.
” Though some scholars have recognized this surprisingly early articulation of constitutional originalism, this article analyzes Machen’s originalism in light of the constitutional politics he pursued and his intellectual influence on the later rise of originalism within American conservatism.
Specifically, Machen claimed originalism for its utility in rolling back elements of Reconstruction and defending against the proposed changes of Progressives and their living constitutionalism.
For roughly a decade after its publication, he sought to overturn the Fifteenth Amendment and Black suffrage, claiming the constitutional text of the Founding trumped the intent of Reconstruction.
Later, he turned his originalist ire on Prohibition and the Eighteenth Amendment and then the New Deal.
Among those persuaded by Machen’s originalism was his brother, J.
Gresham, a leading fundamentalist theologian whose students adopted their mentor’s constitutional politics as they became leading figures in the New Christian Right of the later twentieth century.
Through his brother, Arthur set the stage for an evangelical mass movement whose grievances against legal liberalism encouraged the official adoption of originalism by the Reagan Department of Justice under Attorney General Edwin Meese in the 1980s.
Recovering this long history of constitutional originalism reveals that many of its features were present in the early twentieth century, such as: its reliance on a sacralized American Founding, its resistance to democratization, its connection with fundamentalist Protestant biblical literalism, its argumentative malleability, and its utility for a range of conservative political ends.
Ultimately, the “dead” Constitution can only be understood in the context of its evolution from an early twentieth-century birth.

Related Results

Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com Abstract Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Rebooting Originalism
Rebooting Originalism
This article is a critique of the new originalism. New originalists such as Keith Whittington and Randy Barnett assert that the turn to emphasizing the public meaning of the Consti...
The End of Originalism
The End of Originalism
Much has been written about originalism - the idea that the Constitution should be interpreted according to its original meaning. This essay goes beyond previous works by assertin...
Originalism and the Aristotelian Tradition: Virtue’s Home in Originalism
Originalism and the Aristotelian Tradition: Virtue’s Home in Originalism
A concept fundamental to philosophy – virtue – is, with a few notable exceptions, absent from scholarship on constitutional interpretation generally, and originalism in particular....
Saving Originalism
Saving Originalism
It is sometimes said that biographers cannot help but come to admire, even love, their subjects. And that adage seems to ring true of Professor Amar, the foremost “biographer” of t...
Originalism is Bunk
Originalism is Bunk
Critical analysis of originalism should start by confronting a modest puzzle: Most commentators suppose that originalism is deeply controversial, while others complain that it mea...
Biblical Literalism and Constitutional Originalism
Biblical Literalism and Constitutional Originalism
Critics of constitutional originalism have often described originalists as “fundamentalists” or “literalists” as a way of discrediting originalism. This comparison has obvious rhet...
Pluralistic Originalism
Pluralistic Originalism
Originalism is a method of constitutional interpretation judges use to resolve textual indeterminacy. The dominant strain of originalism argues that proper constitutional meaning c...

Back to Top