Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Birth of the Dead Constitution: Arthur Machen Jr.’s Early Twentieth-Century Originalism

View through CrossRef
In 1900, Baltimore attorney Arthur Machen Jr. wrote an article for the Harvard Law Review rejecting a “living” Constitution and arguing that the Constitution should be interpreted according to “the intent of the framers.” Though some scholars have recognized this surprisingly early articulation of constitutional originalism, this article analyzes Machen’s originalism in light of the constitutional politics he pursued and his intellectual influence on the later rise of originalism within American conservatism. Specifically, Machen claimed originalism for its utility in rolling back elements of Reconstruction and defending against the proposed changes of Progressives and their living constitutionalism. For roughly a decade after its publication, he sought to overturn the Fifteenth Amendment and Black suffrage, claiming the constitutional text of the Founding trumped the intent of Reconstruction. Later, he turned his originalist ire on Prohibition and the Eighteenth Amendment and then the New Deal. Among those persuaded by Machen’s originalism was his brother, J. Gresham, a leading fundamentalist theologian whose students adopted their mentor’s constitutional politics as they became leading figures in the New Christian Right of the later twentieth century. Through his brother, Arthur set the stage for an evangelical mass movement whose grievances against legal liberalism encouraged the official adoption of originalism by the Reagan Department of Justice under Attorney General Edwin Meese in the 1980s. Recovering this long history of constitutional originalism reveals that many of its features were present in the early twentieth century, such as: its reliance on a sacralized American Founding, its resistance to democratization, its connection with fundamentalist Protestant biblical literalism, its argumentative malleability, and its utility for a range of conservative political ends. Ultimately, the “dead” Constitution can only be understood in the context of its evolution from an early twentieth-century birth.
Title: The Birth of the Dead Constitution: Arthur Machen Jr.’s Early Twentieth-Century Originalism
Description:
In 1900, Baltimore attorney Arthur Machen Jr.
wrote an article for the Harvard Law Review rejecting a “living” Constitution and arguing that the Constitution should be interpreted according to “the intent of the framers.
” Though some scholars have recognized this surprisingly early articulation of constitutional originalism, this article analyzes Machen’s originalism in light of the constitutional politics he pursued and his intellectual influence on the later rise of originalism within American conservatism.
Specifically, Machen claimed originalism for its utility in rolling back elements of Reconstruction and defending against the proposed changes of Progressives and their living constitutionalism.
For roughly a decade after its publication, he sought to overturn the Fifteenth Amendment and Black suffrage, claiming the constitutional text of the Founding trumped the intent of Reconstruction.
Later, he turned his originalist ire on Prohibition and the Eighteenth Amendment and then the New Deal.
Among those persuaded by Machen’s originalism was his brother, J.
Gresham, a leading fundamentalist theologian whose students adopted their mentor’s constitutional politics as they became leading figures in the New Christian Right of the later twentieth century.
Through his brother, Arthur set the stage for an evangelical mass movement whose grievances against legal liberalism encouraged the official adoption of originalism by the Reagan Department of Justice under Attorney General Edwin Meese in the 1980s.
Recovering this long history of constitutional originalism reveals that many of its features were present in the early twentieth century, such as: its reliance on a sacralized American Founding, its resistance to democratization, its connection with fundamentalist Protestant biblical literalism, its argumentative malleability, and its utility for a range of conservative political ends.
Ultimately, the “dead” Constitution can only be understood in the context of its evolution from an early twentieth-century birth.

Related Results

Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com Abstract Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Problems of Implementation of the Constitution of Ukraine: Analysis and Solutions
Problems of Implementation of the Constitution of Ukraine: Analysis and Solutions
The article analyses the main problems of the implementation of the Constitution of Ukraine and identifies the constitutional and legal means of their solution. As a methodologica...
Introduction
Introduction
Abstract The Introduction reveals that all constitutional interpretation rests on unwritten ideas, and that debates about these unwritten ideas are the real source o...
„DOSTOJANSTVO“ USTAVA JUGOSLAVIJE IZ 1974. GODINE
„DOSTOJANSTVO“ USTAVA JUGOSLAVIJE IZ 1974. GODINE
Although the growth of constitutional matter is a general trend, the dignity of the constitution was grossly violated by the 1974 Constitution of the Socialist Federal Republic of ...
A Plea for Doubt in the Subjectivity of Method
A Plea for Doubt in the Subjectivity of Method
      Photograph by Gonzalo Echeverria (2010)Doubt has been my closest companion for several years as I struggle to make sense of certain hidden events from within my family’s hist...
Living Constitutionalism, Originalism, and the Sixteenth Amendment
Living Constitutionalism, Originalism, and the Sixteenth Amendment
The Supreme Court’s embrace of living constitutionalism in tax jurisprudence may allow it to avoid building the tax base on constitutional quicksand. In Moore v. United States, the...
SHARIAH’S POSITION IN AFGHAN 2004 CONSTITUTION: A LEGAL ANALYSIS
SHARIAH’S POSITION IN AFGHAN 2004 CONSTITUTION: A LEGAL ANALYSIS
The legal position of Shariah in the 2004 Afghan constitution has been considerably debated due to the full involvement of the international community in the constitution-making pr...

Back to Top