Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Methadone Enantiomers After Coadministration with Amprenavir in Opioid‐Dependent Subjects

View through CrossRef
Study Objective. To investigate the steady‐state pharmacokinetics of methadone enantiomers when coadministered with amprenavir.Design. Prospective, open‐label, within‐subject pharmacokinetic study.Setting. University research center.Subjects. Nineteen opioid‐dependent, methadone‐maintained, healthy individuals were enrolled.Intervention. On study day 1, subjects received their usual once‐daily dose of methadone alone. On study days 2–11, they received the same once‐daily methadone dose plus amprenavir 1200 mg twice/day Serial blood samples were collected over 24 hours on study days 1 and 11 for measurement of plasma R‐ and S‐methadone, and over 12 hours on day 11 for serum amprenavir concentrations.Measurements and Main Results. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the concentrations and compared between the two treatments (methadone alone vs methadone with amprenavir). Subjects served as their own control for methadone comparisons, and amprenavir comparisons were made by using a historic control group (38 healthy men). Opioid‐effect measures were assessed throughout the study. Coadministration of amprenavir with methadone resulted in a 3–4‐hour delay in plasma R‐ and S‐methadone enantiomer peak concentrations at steady state (Cmax‐ss). The active R‐methadone enantiomer area under the plasma concentration–time curve during a dosing interval (AUCτ‐ss), Cmax‐ss, and the minimum plasma concentration at steady state (Cmin‐ss) were decreased by 13%, 25%, and 21%, respectively, after coadministration of methadone and amprenavir. The inactive S‐enantiomer AUCτ‐ss, Cmax‐ss, and Cmin‐ss were decreased by 40%, 48%, and 52%, respectively. No clinically significant changes were noted in opioid pharmacodynamic effects, and there was no evidence of opioid withdrawal. No methadone dosage was changed in any subject.Conclusion. No a priori adjustment in methadone dosage is required during coadministration with amprenavir as there is only a small effect on R‐methadone exposure and no evidence of opioid withdrawal.
Title: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Methadone Enantiomers After Coadministration with Amprenavir in Opioid‐Dependent Subjects
Description:
Study Objective.
To investigate the steady‐state pharmacokinetics of methadone enantiomers when coadministered with amprenavir.
Design.
Prospective, open‐label, within‐subject pharmacokinetic study.
Setting.
University research center.
Subjects.
Nineteen opioid‐dependent, methadone‐maintained, healthy individuals were enrolled.
Intervention.
On study day 1, subjects received their usual once‐daily dose of methadone alone.
On study days 2–11, they received the same once‐daily methadone dose plus amprenavir 1200 mg twice/day Serial blood samples were collected over 24 hours on study days 1 and 11 for measurement of plasma R‐ and S‐methadone, and over 12 hours on day 11 for serum amprenavir concentrations.
Measurements and Main Results.
Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the concentrations and compared between the two treatments (methadone alone vs methadone with amprenavir).
Subjects served as their own control for methadone comparisons, and amprenavir comparisons were made by using a historic control group (38 healthy men).
Opioid‐effect measures were assessed throughout the study.
Coadministration of amprenavir with methadone resulted in a 3–4‐hour delay in plasma R‐ and S‐methadone enantiomer peak concentrations at steady state (Cmax‐ss).
The active R‐methadone enantiomer area under the plasma concentration–time curve during a dosing interval (AUCτ‐ss), Cmax‐ss, and the minimum plasma concentration at steady state (Cmin‐ss) were decreased by 13%, 25%, and 21%, respectively, after coadministration of methadone and amprenavir.
The inactive S‐enantiomer AUCτ‐ss, Cmax‐ss, and Cmin‐ss were decreased by 40%, 48%, and 52%, respectively.
No clinically significant changes were noted in opioid pharmacodynamic effects, and there was no evidence of opioid withdrawal.
No methadone dosage was changed in any subject.
Conclusion.
No a priori adjustment in methadone dosage is required during coadministration with amprenavir as there is only a small effect on R‐methadone exposure and no evidence of opioid withdrawal.

Related Results

Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics of Amprenavir
Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics of Amprenavir
OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug interactions, and dosage and administration information of amprenavir. DATA SOURCE: An extensive review of the lit...
An Investigation of Medical Examiner Cases in Which Methadone Was Detected, Harris County, Texas, 1987–1992
An Investigation of Medical Examiner Cases in Which Methadone Was Detected, Harris County, Texas, 1987–1992
Abstract In 1991, media reports of an increase in the number of deaths attributed to methadone toxicity in Harris County, Texas, raised public concern about the safe...
Clinical eftects and pharmacokinetics of racemic methadone and its optical isomers
Clinical eftects and pharmacokinetics of racemic methadone and its optical isomers
The respiratory and pupillary effects of oral l‐, d‐, and d,l‐methadone were studied in healthy male volunteers 21 to 35 yr of age. The mean half‐life of drug in blood was 22 hr fo...
Gender‐Specific Differences in Susceptibility to Low‐Dose Methadone‐Associated QTc Prolongation in Patients with Heroin Dependence
Gender‐Specific Differences in Susceptibility to Low‐Dose Methadone‐Associated QTc Prolongation in Patients with Heroin Dependence
Methadone and QT Prolongation. Background: Methadone is associated with QTc prolongation and sudden death in susceptible patients. We sought to investigate whether there is a gende...
First-Line Methadone For Cancer Pain. Titration Time Analysis
First-Line Methadone For Cancer Pain. Titration Time Analysis
Abstract Background. Methadone is a low-cost, strong opioid that is increasingly used as a first-line treatment for pain in palliative care (PC). Its long and unpredictable...
Cardiac Assessment of Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder under Methadone Treatment
Cardiac Assessment of Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder under Methadone Treatment
Objective: Methadone treatment is effective for managing opioid use disorder (OUD) but raises concerns about its impact on cardiac function. This study aimed to assess ...

Back to Top