Barely depictive: Predicting imagery vividness relative to perception with EEGNet

Abstract Previous studies suggest that visual mental imagery (VMI) acts as a weaker form of top-down visual perception (VP), with the two becoming more similar as VMI vividness increases. However, this relationship remains ill-defined, and it is unclear precisely how much weaker VMI is relative to VP. Here, we introduce an original probabilistic deep learning approach to quantify vividness at the neural level. Thirty-four participants either imagined or perceived stimuli presented at varying levels of vividness and provided trial-by-trial, picture-based vividness ratings. EEG activity recorded during VP was used to train a convolutional neural network (EEGNet) to predict perceived vividness from eight posterior electrodes located around early visual areas. A leave-one-subject-out cross-validation procedure showed that the model generalised across participants with above-chance accuracy during VP. On VP trials, predictions tracked vividness labels, with reliable interpolation to new vivid labels not included during training. Applied to VMI trials, mean expected VMI vividness remained substantially lower than expected vividness for seen stimuli but slightly higher than baseline, supporting a ‘barely’ rather than ‘quasi’ depictive imagery. For 91% of participants, mean expected VMI vividness was also lower than, yet scaled with, mean reported VMI vividness. This framework provides a principled way to quantify and compare VMI and VP on a shared neural-behavioural scale, with implications for studying individual differences and aphantasia.