Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Abstract 1705: Comparison of uptake mechanisms for different anthracyclines in leukemic cells

View through CrossRef
Abstract Aims: The mechanisms behind cellular anthracycline uptake are not completely understood. It is of great interest to gain more insight into cellular uptake mechanisms since this could possibly be used to increase the selectivity of the drugs. We therefore compared the uptake of 5 different anthracyclines, daunorubicin (DNR), doxorubicin (DOX), epirubicin (EPI), idarubicin (IDA), and pirarubicin (PIRA) by leukemic cells and also investigated the possible involvement of specific carriers. Methods: HL-60 cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of anthracyclines for 1 hour and cellular drug uptake was determined. The cells were also preincubated with various protein inhibitors or nucleosides and then with the anthracyclines after which drug uptake was determined with HPLC. Apoptosis was determined with propidium iodine staining and flow cytometry. Results: Of all anthracyclines studied DNR, IDA and PIRA had the highest cellular uptake with a sharp increase in uptake at extracellular concentrations > 1 µM. Uptake of DOX, DNR and IDA was greatly reduced at 0°C. Suramin, a purinergic-2-receptor inhibitor, strongly inhibited the uptake of all anthracyclines except PIRA and dipyridamole, a nucleoside transport inhibitor, only inhibited the uptake of DNR. The addition of nucleosides reduced the uptake of DNR, IDA and PIRA. Conclusion: Our results suggest different uptake mechanisms for various anthracyclines. We found evidence for carrier mediated uptake mechanisms, the data support the involvement of the nucleoside transporter family. Furthermore, our results also indicate an involvement of purinergic-2-receptor signalling in anthracycline uptake. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1705. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1705
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Title: Abstract 1705: Comparison of uptake mechanisms for different anthracyclines in leukemic cells
Description:
Abstract Aims: The mechanisms behind cellular anthracycline uptake are not completely understood.
It is of great interest to gain more insight into cellular uptake mechanisms since this could possibly be used to increase the selectivity of the drugs.
We therefore compared the uptake of 5 different anthracyclines, daunorubicin (DNR), doxorubicin (DOX), epirubicin (EPI), idarubicin (IDA), and pirarubicin (PIRA) by leukemic cells and also investigated the possible involvement of specific carriers.
Methods: HL-60 cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of anthracyclines for 1 hour and cellular drug uptake was determined.
The cells were also preincubated with various protein inhibitors or nucleosides and then with the anthracyclines after which drug uptake was determined with HPLC.
Apoptosis was determined with propidium iodine staining and flow cytometry.
Results: Of all anthracyclines studied DNR, IDA and PIRA had the highest cellular uptake with a sharp increase in uptake at extracellular concentrations > 1 µM.
Uptake of DOX, DNR and IDA was greatly reduced at 0°C.
Suramin, a purinergic-2-receptor inhibitor, strongly inhibited the uptake of all anthracyclines except PIRA and dipyridamole, a nucleoside transport inhibitor, only inhibited the uptake of DNR.
The addition of nucleosides reduced the uptake of DNR, IDA and PIRA.
Conclusion: Our results suggest different uptake mechanisms for various anthracyclines.
We found evidence for carrier mediated uptake mechanisms, the data support the involvement of the nucleoside transporter family.
Furthermore, our results also indicate an involvement of purinergic-2-receptor signalling in anthracycline uptake.
Citation Format: {Authors}.
{Abstract title} [abstract].
In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL.
Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1705.
doi:10.
1158/1538-7445.
AM2011-1705.

Related Results

L-Asparaginase More Effectively Targets Leukemic Cells with Low Glycolytic Activity
L-Asparaginase More Effectively Targets Leukemic Cells with Low Glycolytic Activity
Abstract Since O. Warburg first proposed aerobic glycolysis to be the main bioenergetic pathway activated in cancer cells, there has been near silence on the differe...
PARP Inhibition Sensitize BCR-ABL1 Positive Cel
PARP Inhibition Sensitize BCR-ABL1 Positive Cel
Introduction: BCR-ABL1 play a key role in the development of chronic myelogenous leukemia and a part of Ph1 positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). BCR-ABL1 fun...
To develop a prediction model for cardiotoxicity induced by anthracyclines combined with chemotherapy
To develop a prediction model for cardiotoxicity induced by anthracyclines combined with chemotherapy
Abstract Purpose: Anthracyclines are commonly used as curative agents in chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer and lymphoma. Although the chemotherapeutic effect of...
MARS-seq2.0: an experimental and analytical pipeline for indexed sorting combined with single-cell RNA sequencing v1
MARS-seq2.0: an experimental and analytical pipeline for indexed sorting combined with single-cell RNA sequencing v1
Human tissues comprise trillions of cells that populate a complex space of molecular phenotypes and functions and that vary in abundance by 4–9 orders of magnitude. Relying solely ...
Stem cells
Stem cells
What is a stem cell? The term is a combination of ‘cell’ and ‘stem’. A cell is a major category of living thing, while a stem is a site of growth and support for something else. In...

Back to Top