Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

1205 Activity Trackers As A Tool In Sleep Research: Determining Discrepancies In Trackers Vs. PSG

View through CrossRef
Abstract Introduction Fitness-based wearables and other emerging sensor technologies have the potential to track sleep across large populations longitudinally in at-home environments. To understand how these devices can inform research studies, limitations of available trackers need to be compared to traditional polysomnography (PSG). Here we assessed discrepancies in sleep staging in activity trackers vs. PSG in subjects with various sleep disorders. Methods Twelve subjects (age 41-78, 7f, 5m) wore a Fitbit Charge 3 while undergoing a scheduled sleep study. Six subjects had been previously diagnosed with a sleep disorder (5 OSA, 1 CSA). 4 subjects used CPAP throughout the night, 2 had a split night (CPAP 2nd half of the night), and 6 had a PSG only. Activity tracker staging was compared to 2 RPSGTs staging. Results Of the 12 subjects, eight subjects’ sleep was detected in the activity tracker, and compared across sleep stages to the PSG (7 female, 1 male, ages 41-78, AHI 0.3-87, RDI 0.5-94.4, sleep efficiency 74%+/-18, 4 PSG, 1 split, 3 CPAP). The activity tracker matched either tech 52% (+/- 13). The average difference in score tech and activity tracker staging for sleep onset (SO) was 16 +/- 15 minutes and wake after sleep onset was 43.5 +/- 44 minutes. Sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy were found for each sleep stage. Respectively, Wake: 0.45+/-0.27, 0.97+/-0.03, 0.71+/-0.12, REM: 0.41+/-0.30, 0.90+/-0.06, 0.60+/-0.28, Light: 0.71+/-0.09, 0.58+/-0.19, 0.65+/-0.10, Deep: 0.63+/-0.52, 0.88+/-0.05, 0.59+/-0.49. Conclusion From this study of 12 subjects seen at a sleep clinic for suspected sleep disorders, activity trackers performed best in wake, REM and deep sleep specificity (>=88%), while they lacked sensitivity to REM and wake (<=45%) stages. The tracker did not detect sleep in 4 subjects who had elevated AHI or low sleep efficiency. Further analysis can identify whether discrepancies between the Fitbit and PSG can be predicted by distinct patterns in sleep staging and/or identify subject exclusion criteria for activity tracking studies. Support This project in on-going with the support of Academy Diagnostics Sleep and EEG Center and staff.
Title: 1205 Activity Trackers As A Tool In Sleep Research: Determining Discrepancies In Trackers Vs. PSG
Description:
Abstract Introduction Fitness-based wearables and other emerging sensor technologies have the potential to track sleep across large populations longitudinally in at-home environments.
To understand how these devices can inform research studies, limitations of available trackers need to be compared to traditional polysomnography (PSG).
Here we assessed discrepancies in sleep staging in activity trackers vs.
PSG in subjects with various sleep disorders.
Methods Twelve subjects (age 41-78, 7f, 5m) wore a Fitbit Charge 3 while undergoing a scheduled sleep study.
Six subjects had been previously diagnosed with a sleep disorder (5 OSA, 1 CSA).
4 subjects used CPAP throughout the night, 2 had a split night (CPAP 2nd half of the night), and 6 had a PSG only.
Activity tracker staging was compared to 2 RPSGTs staging.
Results Of the 12 subjects, eight subjects’ sleep was detected in the activity tracker, and compared across sleep stages to the PSG (7 female, 1 male, ages 41-78, AHI 0.
3-87, RDI 0.
5-94.
4, sleep efficiency 74%+/-18, 4 PSG, 1 split, 3 CPAP).
The activity tracker matched either tech 52% (+/- 13).
The average difference in score tech and activity tracker staging for sleep onset (SO) was 16 +/- 15 minutes and wake after sleep onset was 43.
5 +/- 44 minutes.
Sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy were found for each sleep stage.
Respectively, Wake: 0.
45+/-0.
27, 0.
97+/-0.
03, 0.
71+/-0.
12, REM: 0.
41+/-0.
30, 0.
90+/-0.
06, 0.
60+/-0.
28, Light: 0.
71+/-0.
09, 0.
58+/-0.
19, 0.
65+/-0.
10, Deep: 0.
63+/-0.
52, 0.
88+/-0.
05, 0.
59+/-0.
49.
Conclusion From this study of 12 subjects seen at a sleep clinic for suspected sleep disorders, activity trackers performed best in wake, REM and deep sleep specificity (>=88%), while they lacked sensitivity to REM and wake (<=45%) stages.
The tracker did not detect sleep in 4 subjects who had elevated AHI or low sleep efficiency.
Further analysis can identify whether discrepancies between the Fitbit and PSG can be predicted by distinct patterns in sleep staging and/or identify subject exclusion criteria for activity tracking studies.
Support This project in on-going with the support of Academy Diagnostics Sleep and EEG Center and staff.

Related Results

0864 Severe Central Sleep Apnea
0864 Severe Central Sleep Apnea
Abstract Introduction Central sleep apnea (CSA) is a rare form of sleep disordered breathing with repeated apneic episodes with ...
Acupuncture as therapeutic resource in patient with bruxism
Acupuncture as therapeutic resource in patient with bruxism
Bruxism is the harmful habit of clenching or grinding the teeth during the day and / or night, with unconscious pattern, with particular intensity and frequency, outside the functi...
Abstract 775: MicroRNA-1205 regulation of FRYL in neuroendocrine prostate cancer
Abstract 775: MicroRNA-1205 regulation of FRYL in neuroendocrine prostate cancer
Abstract High mortality rates of prostate cancer (PCa) are associated with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) due to the maintenance of andro...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Reciprocal regulation of miR-1205 and E2F1 modulates progression of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma
Reciprocal regulation of miR-1205 and E2F1 modulates progression of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma
AbstractThe burgeoning functions of many microRNAs (miRs) have been well study in cancer. However, the level and function of miR-1205 in laryngeal squamous cell cancer remains unkn...
A Data Driven Approach for Choosing a Wearable Sleep Tracker
A Data Driven Approach for Choosing a Wearable Sleep Tracker
ABSTRACT Goal and Aims To evaluate the performance of 6 wearable devices across 4 device classes (research-grade EEG-based head...

Back to Top