Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

TU8.10 Should patients with a predicted NELA mortality of 5–10% be managed on ICU? An audit of the management of high-risk laparotomies as per NELA Guidelines

View through CrossRef
Abstract Aims The National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) has been pivotal in improving the care of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. One key recommendation is ‘high-risk’ patients are managed on ICU post-operatively. We aimed to identify if there was a difference in outcomes between ‘high-risk patients’ (predicated NELA mortality >5%) managed on ICU or a surgical ward post-operatively. Methods We retrospectively analysed all patients registered to our hospitals NELA database from January 2019-September 2021, assessing if ‘high-risk’ patients were managed on ICU or general surgery wards post-operatively and the difference in outcomes between these two groups. Results 249 patients were included (138 Female). Over 80% of ‘high-risk’ patients were admitted to a ICU bed over the three-year period, as per NELA guidelines. 46 high-risk patients were managed on the ward post-operatively. Although there was no difference in age between the two groups, those admitted to ICU had a significantly higher predicated NELA mortality and higher mortality rate. Conclusions NELA predicted mortality helps to guide which patients may need a higher level of post-operative care. However, this study indicates that for some patients with a predicted mortality of 5–10%, ward-based care may be appropriate. In the context of increasingly stretched ICU resources, we believe further research is needed to identify whether some patients with a NELA mortality over 5% would be appropriate for ward management.
Title: TU8.10 Should patients with a predicted NELA mortality of 5–10% be managed on ICU? An audit of the management of high-risk laparotomies as per NELA Guidelines
Description:
Abstract Aims The National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) has been pivotal in improving the care of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.
One key recommendation is ‘high-risk’ patients are managed on ICU post-operatively.
We aimed to identify if there was a difference in outcomes between ‘high-risk patients’ (predicated NELA mortality >5%) managed on ICU or a surgical ward post-operatively.
Methods We retrospectively analysed all patients registered to our hospitals NELA database from January 2019-September 2021, assessing if ‘high-risk’ patients were managed on ICU or general surgery wards post-operatively and the difference in outcomes between these two groups.
Results 249 patients were included (138 Female).
Over 80% of ‘high-risk’ patients were admitted to a ICU bed over the three-year period, as per NELA guidelines.
46 high-risk patients were managed on the ward post-operatively.
Although there was no difference in age between the two groups, those admitted to ICU had a significantly higher predicated NELA mortality and higher mortality rate.
Conclusions NELA predicted mortality helps to guide which patients may need a higher level of post-operative care.
However, this study indicates that for some patients with a predicted mortality of 5–10%, ward-based care may be appropriate.
In the context of increasingly stretched ICU resources, we believe further research is needed to identify whether some patients with a NELA mortality over 5% would be appropriate for ward management.

Related Results

Paper K-9 Pelaporan Hasil Audit dan Tindak Lanjut Audit Internal
Paper K-9 Pelaporan Hasil Audit dan Tindak Lanjut Audit Internal
Pelaporan hasil audit merupakan komponen utama dalam komunikasi dari audit internal tentang hasil audit. Untuk mengkomunikasikan hasil audit diperlukan susunan laporan, dimana hasi...
DETERMINAN FEE AUDIT
DETERMINAN FEE AUDIT
ABSTRACT This study aims to examine the factors that affect audit fees. Factors examined include  factors derived from the entity (client) and the factors derived from the auditor....
Pre-NELA vs NELA – has anything changed, or is it just an audit exercise?
Pre-NELA vs NELA – has anything changed, or is it just an audit exercise?
BACKGROUND Following evidence suggestive of high mortality following emergency laparotomies, the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) was set up, highlighting key standards i...
Abnormal audit fees and accrual and real earnings management: evidence from UK
Abnormal audit fees and accrual and real earnings management: evidence from UK
Purpose This paper aims to examine the relationship between abnormal audit fees and accrual-based and real-based earnings management by using a sample of 1,055 UK...
Intensive care unit-acquired Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: incidence, risk factors, and outcome
Intensive care unit-acquired Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: incidence, risk factors, and outcome
Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to determine incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome of intensive care unit (...
P‐POSSUM and the NELA Score Overpredict Mortality for Laparoscopic Emergency Bowel Surgery: An Analysis of the NELA Database
P‐POSSUM and the NELA Score Overpredict Mortality for Laparoscopic Emergency Bowel Surgery: An Analysis of the NELA Database
AbstractBackgroundRisk stratification has become a key part of the care processes for patients having emergency bowel surgery. This study aimed to determine if operative approach i...
Sebuah Jurnal Audit Audit Plan, Audit Program dan Audit Prosedur Pada Harta, Utang dan Modal
Sebuah Jurnal Audit Audit Plan, Audit Program dan Audit Prosedur Pada Harta, Utang dan Modal
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana proses dan prosedur audit plan, audit program dan audit prosedur pada harta, utang dan modal. Penelitian ini juga dimaksudka...

Back to Top