Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Iran’s Strategic Approach towards the Israel-Hezbollah Conflict
View through CrossRef
The Middle East, a Muslim majority region in the Asian continent, has remained a centre for territorial and extraterritorial powers to secure their strategic interests significantly to access oil reserves in the region. Israel and the United States are two examples respectively. In the wake of securing strategic interests, these states tried to interfere the polity of the Muslim states that infuriated most of the Muslim leaders to such an extent that they had to go for aggressive measures to negate the influence of these interest-seekers. Iran has been leading the Muslim states in the region and has strived hard for integrating Muslim leadership. During this process of regional integration, a special focus has been paid to deal Israel-an important strategic ally of the US in the region and permanent threat for the neighbouring Muslim states. The current circumstances, causes and effects are the product of Arab-Israel wars and most of these have been cashed in by Iran for the security of its interests in the region. Iran has facilitated the Muslim states, particularly Lebanon, to counter the Israeli strategies. It has erected Hezbollah-the party of God- in Lebanon whose effective presence has always restricted Israel from advancing to the region. Since its inception in 1985, Iranian backed Hezbollah has opposed the Israeli motives in the Middle East. Ideological similarities between Iran and Hezbollah have never allowed Israel to manipulate the region. Hezbollah has been in a war-like situation with Israel and has fought a couple of wars which have not only guaranteed a guard for Hezbollah’s campaign against Israel but also have paved the way for Iran to maintain hegemony in the region. This research has been conducted with a primary objective to analyse the Israel-Hezbollah conflict and the strategic approach of Iran towards the particular conflict.
The Women University Multan, Pakistan
Title: Iran’s Strategic Approach towards the Israel-Hezbollah Conflict
Description:
The Middle East, a Muslim majority region in the Asian continent, has remained a centre for territorial and extraterritorial powers to secure their strategic interests significantly to access oil reserves in the region.
Israel and the United States are two examples respectively.
In the wake of securing strategic interests, these states tried to interfere the polity of the Muslim states that infuriated most of the Muslim leaders to such an extent that they had to go for aggressive measures to negate the influence of these interest-seekers.
Iran has been leading the Muslim states in the region and has strived hard for integrating Muslim leadership.
During this process of regional integration, a special focus has been paid to deal Israel-an important strategic ally of the US in the region and permanent threat for the neighbouring Muslim states.
The current circumstances, causes and effects are the product of Arab-Israel wars and most of these have been cashed in by Iran for the security of its interests in the region.
Iran has facilitated the Muslim states, particularly Lebanon, to counter the Israeli strategies.
It has erected Hezbollah-the party of God- in Lebanon whose effective presence has always restricted Israel from advancing to the region.
Since its inception in 1985, Iranian backed Hezbollah has opposed the Israeli motives in the Middle East.
Ideological similarities between Iran and Hezbollah have never allowed Israel to manipulate the region.
Hezbollah has been in a war-like situation with Israel and has fought a couple of wars which have not only guaranteed a guard for Hezbollah’s campaign against Israel but also have paved the way for Iran to maintain hegemony in the region.
This research has been conducted with a primary objective to analyse the Israel-Hezbollah conflict and the strategic approach of Iran towards the particular conflict.
.
Related Results
METAPHORICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT CONFLICT IN AMERICAN AND BRITISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE (BASED ON IMAGE METAPHORS)
METAPHORICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT CONFLICT IN AMERICAN AND BRITISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE (BASED ON IMAGE METAPHORS)
The article is devoted to the metaphorical representation of the concept CONFLICT in the English-language political discourse, namely American and British. The figurative content o...
Israel's New Wars
Israel's New Wars
Israel’s New Wars examines Israel’s recent conflicts with Iran and its partners. The book’s key focus is how these wars differ from those fought between 1948 and 1982. In the wake ...
From Foes to Friends: The Normalization of the United Emirates Arab and Israel Relations
From Foes to Friends: The Normalization of the United Emirates Arab and Israel Relations
Abstract
This article aims to explain the reason the United Arab Emirates (UAE) normalized ties within Israel through Abraham Accord. The normalization of the UAE-Isr...
HEZBOLLAH ‒ BETWEEN MYTH AND REALITY
HEZBOLLAH ‒ BETWEEN MYTH AND REALITY
Hezbollah (Allah’s Party) is a non-state actor that has a decisive influence on how political and security dynamics in Lebanon evolve but also manages to have an important impact o...
Mimetic hedging: Hezbollah’s resistance against all odds
Mimetic hedging: Hezbollah’s resistance against all odds
Abstract
Hezbollah has withstood intensifying attacks since its emergence in the 1980s. Major powers – especially the United States and Israel – have led the assa...
Understanding Hezbollah symbolism through symbolic convergence theory
Understanding Hezbollah symbolism through symbolic convergence theory
This article applies symbolic convergence theory (SCT) to the type of symbolism used by Hezbollah, a Shia terrorist organization. By and large, SCT posits that sharing group fantas...
POLITIK OFENSIF AMERIKA SERIKAT TERHADAP SIKAP DEFENSIF IRAN: DARI PERANG PROKSI HINGGA DOMINASI
POLITIK OFENSIF AMERIKA SERIKAT TERHADAP SIKAP DEFENSIF IRAN: DARI PERANG PROKSI HINGGA DOMINASI
ABSTRACT
This article describes the conflict between the United States and Iran in the form of a proxy war taking place in Syria and Yemen. The conflict culminated in the att...
Conflict Management in the Workplace
Conflict Management in the Workplace
Conflict is a component of interpersonal interactions, and therefore natural in the workplace. While neither inevitable nor intrinsically bad, conflict is commonplace. Conflicts ma...

