Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Intended, Afforded, and Experienced Serendipity – Overcoming the Paradox of Artificial Serendipity

View through CrossRef
Designing for serendipity in information technologies presents significant challenges for both scholars and practitioners. This paper presents a theoretical model of serendipity that aims to address this challenge by providing a structured framework for understanding and designing for serendipity. The model delineates between intended, afforded, and experienced serendipity, recognizing the role of design intents and the subjective nature of experiencing serendipity. Central to the model is the recognition that there is no single definition nor a unique operationalization of serendipity, emphasizing the need for a nuanced approach to its conceptualization and design. By delineating between the intentions of designers, the characteristics of the system, and the experiences of end-users, the model offers a pathway to resolve the paradox of artificial serendipity and provides actionable guidelines to design for serendipity in information technologies. However, it also emphasizes the importance of establishing ‘guardrails’ to guide the design process and mitigate potential negative unintended consequences. The model aims to lay ground to advance both research and the practice of designing for serendipity, leading to more ethical and effective design practices.
Center for Open Science
Title: Intended, Afforded, and Experienced Serendipity – Overcoming the Paradox of Artificial Serendipity
Description:
Designing for serendipity in information technologies presents significant challenges for both scholars and practitioners.
This paper presents a theoretical model of serendipity that aims to address this challenge by providing a structured framework for understanding and designing for serendipity.
The model delineates between intended, afforded, and experienced serendipity, recognizing the role of design intents and the subjective nature of experiencing serendipity.
Central to the model is the recognition that there is no single definition nor a unique operationalization of serendipity, emphasizing the need for a nuanced approach to its conceptualization and design.
By delineating between the intentions of designers, the characteristics of the system, and the experiences of end-users, the model offers a pathway to resolve the paradox of artificial serendipity and provides actionable guidelines to design for serendipity in information technologies.
However, it also emphasizes the importance of establishing ‘guardrails’ to guide the design process and mitigate potential negative unintended consequences.
The model aims to lay ground to advance both research and the practice of designing for serendipity, leading to more ethical and effective design practices.

Related Results

Serendipity and its study
Serendipity and its study
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the concept of serendipity and approaches to its study particularly in relation to information studies. ...
Organizational Paradox
Organizational Paradox
Organizational paradox offers a theory of the nature and management of competing demands. Historically, the dominant paradigm in organizational theory depicted competing demands as...
Serendipity in human information behavior: a systematic review
Serendipity in human information behavior: a systematic review
PurposeSerendipitous information discovery has become a unique and important approach to discovering and obtaining information, which has aroused a growing interest for serendipity...
Problematyka paradoksu w myśli Henriego de Lubaca i Hansa Ursa von Balthasara
Problematyka paradoksu w myśli Henriego de Lubaca i Hansa Ursa von Balthasara
The present work examines the problematics of the role and place of paradox in dogmatic reflection based on the analysis of the works of Henri de Lubac and Hans Urs von Balthasar. ...
Walnut Rootstock Comparison and Own-rooted `Chandler' vs. `Chandler' on Paradox Rootstock
Walnut Rootstock Comparison and Own-rooted `Chandler' vs. `Chandler' on Paradox Rootstock
In a comparison of six walnut rootstocks either nursery-grafted or field-grafted to `Chandler' (Juglans regia), the highest-yielding trees after 9 years are on either seedling or c...
Methodologies to evaluate recommender systems
Methodologies to evaluate recommender systems
In the current digital landscape, recommender systems play a pivotal role in shaping users' online experiences by providing personalized recommendations for relevant products, news...
Embracing the Paradox of Interorganizational Value Co‐creation–Value Capture: A Literature Review towards Paradox Resolution
Embracing the Paradox of Interorganizational Value Co‐creation–Value Capture: A Literature Review towards Paradox Resolution
AbstractThis study reviews literature on paradoxical tensions between value co‐creation and capture in interorganizational relationships (IORs). The purpose of this review is to ma...
On Paradox
On Paradox
In On Paradox literary and legal scholar Elizabeth S. Anker contends that faith in the logic of paradox has been the cornerstone of left intellectualism since the second half of th...

Back to Top