Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Meyer–Schuster Rearrangement

View through CrossRef
The Meyer–Schuster rearrangement corresponds to a formal 1,3‐shift of a propargylic alcohol to afford the corresponding α,β‐unsaturated carbonyl compound via tautomerization of an allenol intermediate. The original acidic and harsh conditions have been replaced with mild and selective conditions that are compatible with a variety of functional and protecting groups. Commonly employed strategies include the activation of propargylic alcohols as esters, transition‐metal catalysis (e.g., gold complexes and oxometal complexes), and the C–H bond activation of terminal propargylic alcohols by transition‐metal insertion. The Meyer–Schuster rearrangement has been extended to all classes of propargylic alcohols and esters, including Csp‐heteroatom‐substituted alkynols, as well as to propargylic amine derivatives (i.e., the aza‐Meyer–Schuster rearrangement). Moreover, the rearrangement can be employed in inter‐ and intramolecular one‐pot consecutive reactions, wherein multiple carbon–carbon and/or carbon–heteroatom bonds are formed.The Meyer–Schuster reaction exhibits a high atom economy, simple experimental procedures, and good‐to‐excellent product yields and stereoselectivities. Moreover, starting materials are easily accessible, and any toxic metals are employed in substoichiometric amounts. As such, the Meyer–Schuster rearrangement compares favorably with other standard protocols, such as the Wittig reaction, for the preparation of α,β‐unsaturated carbonyl compounds and derivatives.This review covers the literature since the identification of the reaction up to the end of 2020 and includes relevant references through November 2023. Both the mechanistic features and the regio‐ and stereoselectivity issues are discussed as they relate to the reaction conditions. The scope and limitations of the reaction are presented, as are a selection of synthetic applications, several general experimental procedures, and a comparison of the Meyer–Schuster rearrangement with other known methods. Finally, the tabular survey highlights the broad range of starting materials and products possible with the Meyer–Schuster rearrangement.
Title: The Meyer–Schuster Rearrangement
Description:
The Meyer–Schuster rearrangement corresponds to a formal 1,3‐shift of a propargylic alcohol to afford the corresponding α,β‐unsaturated carbonyl compound via tautomerization of an allenol intermediate.
The original acidic and harsh conditions have been replaced with mild and selective conditions that are compatible with a variety of functional and protecting groups.
Commonly employed strategies include the activation of propargylic alcohols as esters, transition‐metal catalysis (e.
g.
, gold complexes and oxometal complexes), and the C–H bond activation of terminal propargylic alcohols by transition‐metal insertion.
The Meyer–Schuster rearrangement has been extended to all classes of propargylic alcohols and esters, including Csp‐heteroatom‐substituted alkynols, as well as to propargylic amine derivatives (i.
e.
, the aza‐Meyer–Schuster rearrangement).
Moreover, the rearrangement can be employed in inter‐ and intramolecular one‐pot consecutive reactions, wherein multiple carbon–carbon and/or carbon–heteroatom bonds are formed.
The Meyer–Schuster reaction exhibits a high atom economy, simple experimental procedures, and good‐to‐excellent product yields and stereoselectivities.
Moreover, starting materials are easily accessible, and any toxic metals are employed in substoichiometric amounts.
As such, the Meyer–Schuster rearrangement compares favorably with other standard protocols, such as the Wittig reaction, for the preparation of α,β‐unsaturated carbonyl compounds and derivatives.
This review covers the literature since the identification of the reaction up to the end of 2020 and includes relevant references through November 2023.
Both the mechanistic features and the regio‐ and stereoselectivity issues are discussed as they relate to the reaction conditions.
The scope and limitations of the reaction are presented, as are a selection of synthetic applications, several general experimental procedures, and a comparison of the Meyer–Schuster rearrangement with other known methods.
Finally, the tabular survey highlights the broad range of starting materials and products possible with the Meyer–Schuster rearrangement.

Related Results

Extended Duration of DH–JH Rearrangement in Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Transgenic Mice: Implications for Regulation of Allelic Exclusion
Extended Duration of DH–JH Rearrangement in Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Transgenic Mice: Implications for Regulation of Allelic Exclusion
Here we show that suppression of VH–DJH rearrangement in mice bearing a μ heavy (H) chain transgene (μ-tg mice) is associated with an extended period of DH–JH rearrangement, the fi...
The enantioselective Organocatalytic [1,2]-Rearrangement of Allylic Ammonium Ylides
The enantioselective Organocatalytic [1,2]-Rearrangement of Allylic Ammonium Ylides
The [1,2]-rearrangement of allylic ammonium ylides is traditionally observed as a competitive minor pathway alongside the thermally allowed [2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement. The cha...
The Enantioselective Organocatalytic [1,2]-Rearrangement of Allylic Ammonium Ylides
The Enantioselective Organocatalytic [1,2]-Rearrangement of Allylic Ammonium Ylides
The [1,2]-rearrangement of allylic ammonium ylides is traditionally observed as a competitive minor pathway alongside the thermally allowed [2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement. The cha...
Westphalen Rearrangement
Westphalen Rearrangement
AbstractThis rearrangement is an acid‐promoted Wagner–Meerwein rearrangement of 5‐hydroxycholesterol derivatives with a substituent at C‐6 in β‐configuration, from which the 5‐hydr...
Wagner‐Meerwein Rearrangement
Wagner‐Meerwein Rearrangement
AbstractThe class of 1,2‐rearrangement of carbocation intermediates, from which the migratory group rearranges from an adjacent carbon atom to the carbocation center to form a more...
Steric Effects of N-Alkyl Group on the Base-Induced Nitrogen to Carbon Rearrangement of Orthogonally Protected N-Alkyl Arylsulphonamides
Steric Effects of N-Alkyl Group on the Base-Induced Nitrogen to Carbon Rearrangement of Orthogonally Protected N-Alkyl Arylsulphonamides
The rearrangement of a total of 56 members of 22 series of orthogonally protected N-alkyl arylsulphonamides of general structure 4-XC6H4SO2NR1CO2R2 [X = H, CH3, F, Cl, Br, CH3O, CN...
Photo‐Fries Rearrangement
Photo‐Fries Rearrangement
AbstractThe photo‐initiated rearrangement of phenyl or aryl esters is generally known as the photo‐Fries rearrangement or photo‐Fries reaction and usually carried out in an aprotic...
Beckmann Rearrangement and Beckmann Fragmentation
Beckmann Rearrangement and Beckmann Fragmentation
AbstractThe rearrangement of an oxime to its corresponding amide in the presence of an acid and is generally known as the Beckmann rearrangement. The oxime is also formed by the re...

Back to Top