Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Conclusion

View through CrossRef
Reading South African history through the lens of interdependence helps explain the disappointment that many South Africans feel in relation to reconciliation. While they are justified in feeling let down, owing to rising inequality and social exclusion, it is wrong to blame Mandela’s strategy of just interdependence because it was abandoned too early. In seeking to overcome oppression, reconciliation is forward-looking and predicated on rebuilding relationships in divided societies. Dealing with a violent past is valuable when striving for a more just future. Reconciliation fosters just, inclusive, and fair societies and is locally owned and driven. A progressive approach to reconciliation is also needed. Reconciliation recognizes the inherent interdependence between citizens themselves, and between citizens and the state. These relationships are progressively re-established in more just ways. In so doing, it helps to create conditions in which social goods such as forgiveness, the rule of law, or democracy become possible.
Title: Conclusion
Description:
Reading South African history through the lens of interdependence helps explain the disappointment that many South Africans feel in relation to reconciliation.
While they are justified in feeling let down, owing to rising inequality and social exclusion, it is wrong to blame Mandela’s strategy of just interdependence because it was abandoned too early.
In seeking to overcome oppression, reconciliation is forward-looking and predicated on rebuilding relationships in divided societies.
Dealing with a violent past is valuable when striving for a more just future.
Reconciliation fosters just, inclusive, and fair societies and is locally owned and driven.
A progressive approach to reconciliation is also needed.
Reconciliation recognizes the inherent interdependence between citizens themselves, and between citizens and the state.
These relationships are progressively re-established in more just ways.
In so doing, it helps to create conditions in which social goods such as forgiveness, the rule of law, or democracy become possible.

Related Results

Conclusion
Conclusion
The Conclusion reiterates the main conceit of the book: that witnessing is rhetorically commonplace in modern public culture in a twofold sense—culturally commonplace and rhetorica...
Conclusion
Conclusion
The conclusion argues that the study of debates on urban change in Berlin and Cairo reveals a parallel periodization in the history of these two cities. During the second half of t...
Conclusion
Conclusion
The Conclusion summarizes the main tenets of the book, which, first, aims to propose a new comprehensive approach to the analysis of time in narrative that takes account both of th...
Conclusion (346–66)
Conclusion (346–66)
This chapter provides the Latin test and a literal translation into English of the conclusion to Juvenal’s tenth satire and a detailed critical appreciation of those lines (346-366...
Conclusion
Conclusion
The conclusion summarizes the main aims of the book. Even though shame can be a painful and damaging emotion, we would still not be better off without it. A continued liability to ...
Conclusion
Conclusion
The conclusion, first, critically assesses what Spinoza’s theory of the human mind, as reconstructed in this book, achieves with respect to an overall aim of advocating the view th...
Conclusion
Conclusion
The conclusion summarizes the findings of the book’s investigation of the hypothesis that epidemics which were mysterious and without known cures were the most likely to provoke ha...
Conclusion
Conclusion
The conclusion brings together the results from the book and shows that for Aristotle, the process of habituation is long and arduous, and that nature can hinder one’s chances of d...

Back to Top