Javascript must be enabled to continue!
1801. LVAD antimicrobial prophylaxis and infections, a 12-year experience
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
The incidence of end-stage heart failure necessitating advanced cardiac therapy continues to increase in the United states. Implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) represent an important modality that is utilized both as a bridge to heart transplant or as destination therapy. LVAD-associated infections, ranging from driveline exit site or pocket infections to endovascular infections, are a major complication with high mortality. Antibiotic prophylaxis at time of LVAD implantation is therefore an important strategy to mitigate infections. However, a clear surgical infection prophylaxis regimen and associated outcomes have not been reported.
Methods
We performed a single center, retrospective cohort study evaluating the impact of antimicrobial prophylaxis on risk of infection in patients who underwent LVAD implantation between February 2007 and June 2019 at Mayo Clinic. LVAD-specific and related infections were defined according to the International Society of Heart Lung Transplantation criteria. Single drug prophylaxis (SDP) included cefazolin only, vancomycin only, or cefazolin and vancomycin; multidrug (MDP) regimen includes either of the SDP regimens plus another antibiotic. We compared incidence of infection within 90-day and within one-year of implantation, as well as risk of C. difficile infections between the SDP and MDP cohorts.
Results
We reviewed 403 patients who received LVAD implantation (Table 1), 402 of had information on surgical prophylaxis. 307 (76%) patients received SDP and 95 patients (24%) received MDP. 14 patients developed an infection within 1 year of implantation (Table 2). There was no difference in the incidence of infections between SDP and MDP arms both at 90 days and 1-year post-implantation (p=0.11). The median time of infection since LVAD implantation was similar between SDP and MDP (p=0.37) arms. Incidence of C. difficile infection was not different between groups (p=0.10) (Table 3).
Conclusion
There was no significant difference in incidence or time to first infection, within 90-day and 1-year of implantation, between single- and multidrug antibiotic surgical prophylaxis regimens administered at the time of LVAD implantation. Future prospective trials are needed to develop a clear LVAD antibiotic prophylaxis protocol.
Disclosures
John C. O'Horo, Sr., MD, MPH, Bates college: Advisor/Consultant|MITRE corporation: Grant/Research Support|nferenec, Inc: Grant/Research Support.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: 1801. LVAD antimicrobial prophylaxis and infections, a 12-year experience
Description:
Abstract
Background
The incidence of end-stage heart failure necessitating advanced cardiac therapy continues to increase in the United states.
Implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) represent an important modality that is utilized both as a bridge to heart transplant or as destination therapy.
LVAD-associated infections, ranging from driveline exit site or pocket infections to endovascular infections, are a major complication with high mortality.
Antibiotic prophylaxis at time of LVAD implantation is therefore an important strategy to mitigate infections.
However, a clear surgical infection prophylaxis regimen and associated outcomes have not been reported.
Methods
We performed a single center, retrospective cohort study evaluating the impact of antimicrobial prophylaxis on risk of infection in patients who underwent LVAD implantation between February 2007 and June 2019 at Mayo Clinic.
LVAD-specific and related infections were defined according to the International Society of Heart Lung Transplantation criteria.
Single drug prophylaxis (SDP) included cefazolin only, vancomycin only, or cefazolin and vancomycin; multidrug (MDP) regimen includes either of the SDP regimens plus another antibiotic.
We compared incidence of infection within 90-day and within one-year of implantation, as well as risk of C.
difficile infections between the SDP and MDP cohorts.
Results
We reviewed 403 patients who received LVAD implantation (Table 1), 402 of had information on surgical prophylaxis.
307 (76%) patients received SDP and 95 patients (24%) received MDP.
14 patients developed an infection within 1 year of implantation (Table 2).
There was no difference in the incidence of infections between SDP and MDP arms both at 90 days and 1-year post-implantation (p=0.
11).
The median time of infection since LVAD implantation was similar between SDP and MDP (p=0.
37) arms.
Incidence of C.
difficile infection was not different between groups (p=0.
10) (Table 3).
Conclusion
There was no significant difference in incidence or time to first infection, within 90-day and 1-year of implantation, between single- and multidrug antibiotic surgical prophylaxis regimens administered at the time of LVAD implantation.
Future prospective trials are needed to develop a clear LVAD antibiotic prophylaxis protocol.
Disclosures
John C.
O'Horo, Sr.
, MD, MPH, Bates college: Advisor/Consultant|MITRE corporation: Grant/Research Support|nferenec, Inc: Grant/Research Support.
Related Results
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Abstract 14995: Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacements in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device
Abstract 14995: Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacements in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device
Background:
The development or progression of aortic insufficiency (AI) to moderate to severe in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) for end stage hea...
Impact on mortality of heart transplantation preceded or not by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices
Impact on mortality of heart transplantation preceded or not by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices
Abstract
Background
Heart transplant (HT) is the therapy of choice in end-stage heart failure patients. With the scarcity of don...
Abstract 4373096: Inpatient Outcomes After Heart Transplantation With and Without LVAD Bridging
Abstract 4373096: Inpatient Outcomes After Heart Transplantation With and Without LVAD Bridging
Introduction:
Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of hospitalization and mortality in the United States. Heart transplantation (HT) remains the defi...
Abstract 4136813: Redox Serum Proteomics Of Left Ventricular Assist Device Unloaded Human Heart
Abstract 4136813: Redox Serum Proteomics Of Left Ventricular Assist Device Unloaded Human Heart
Heart failure (HF) is a global epidemic claiming millions of lives worldwide. Unloading the heart of end-stage HF patients via left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is used not o...
Data-driven innovation of left ventricular assist device therapy
Data-driven innovation of left ventricular assist device therapy
Heart failure is a global and growing problem that affects 1-2% of people. For patients with end-stage heart failure, a heart transplant is the “gold standard”. Due to the permanen...
Outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with a left ventricular assist device: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with a left ventricular assist device: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICDs) improve survival in advanced heart failure with reduced eje...
P6325Gas exchange improvements during exercise correlate with hemodynamic changes in heart failure patients with a left ventricular assist device
P6325Gas exchange improvements during exercise correlate with hemodynamic changes in heart failure patients with a left ventricular assist device
Abstract
Background
The implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) has established its role in therapy for patients ...

