Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The value of brush cytology and biopsy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
View through CrossRef
Background/Aim. Although it is well-known the high sensitivity of brush
cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, this kind of
diagnostics is not routinely used, and for the past years it has even been
declining. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of brush
cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma, by comparison the results
of brush cytology and biopsy, and then the results of both diagnostic methods
with the final patohistological diagnosis of colorectal resection. Methods.
This retrospective study included 173 patients with brush cytology of
colorectal region during colonoscopy. In 166 patients concomitant biopsy
specimens were obtained, and in 116 of them resection of the intestine as
well. A total of the 106 patients underwent to all three diagnostic
procedures. Results. Out of 166 patients who went through both brush cytology
and biopsy, the congruent diagnosis was made in 129 (77.7%) patients: in 109
(65.7%) adenocarcinoma was diagnosed, which was confirmed after the resection
of the intestine in 75 of the patients, and in 14 (8.4%) benign lesion, so
there was no need for resection of the intestine. In 6 (3.6%) of the
patients, both cytology and biopsy were negative, but the resected specimen
was malignant. In 10 of the patients with malignant cytology in whom biopsy
was not done, resection of the intestine confirmed malignancy. The
sensitivity of detecting malignancy by brush cytology and biopsy were 87.9%
and 78.3%, respectively (but this difference was not statistically
significant, p = 0.083). Both methods had specificity and positive predictive
values 100%. Negative predictive values for cytology and biopsy were 50% and
37.8%, respectively. The accuracy of cytology and biopsy was 89.2% and 80.8%,
respectively. The combination of the results of brush cytology and biopsy
increased the sensitivity of preoperative diagnostics to 94.8% which was
significantly higher than sensitivity of biopsy (p < 0.001), but not than
sensitivity of cytology (p = 0.102). Conclusion. Brush cytology could be a
routine method, along with biopsy, in the diagnosis of colorectal malignancy.
Both methods have comparable both sensitivity and accuracy, and its
combination increases sensitivity of preoperative diagnostics of colorectal
adenocarcinoma, which gives opportunity to better estimation of further
diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
National Library of Serbia
Title: The value of brush cytology and biopsy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
Description:
Background/Aim.
Although it is well-known the high sensitivity of brush
cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, this kind of
diagnostics is not routinely used, and for the past years it has even been
declining.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of brush
cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma, by comparison the results
of brush cytology and biopsy, and then the results of both diagnostic methods
with the final patohistological diagnosis of colorectal resection.
Methods.
This retrospective study included 173 patients with brush cytology of
colorectal region during colonoscopy.
In 166 patients concomitant biopsy
specimens were obtained, and in 116 of them resection of the intestine as
well.
A total of the 106 patients underwent to all three diagnostic
procedures.
Results.
Out of 166 patients who went through both brush cytology
and biopsy, the congruent diagnosis was made in 129 (77.
7%) patients: in 109
(65.
7%) adenocarcinoma was diagnosed, which was confirmed after the resection
of the intestine in 75 of the patients, and in 14 (8.
4%) benign lesion, so
there was no need for resection of the intestine.
In 6 (3.
6%) of the
patients, both cytology and biopsy were negative, but the resected specimen
was malignant.
In 10 of the patients with malignant cytology in whom biopsy
was not done, resection of the intestine confirmed malignancy.
The
sensitivity of detecting malignancy by brush cytology and biopsy were 87.
9%
and 78.
3%, respectively (but this difference was not statistically
significant, p = 0.
083).
Both methods had specificity and positive predictive
values 100%.
Negative predictive values for cytology and biopsy were 50% and
37.
8%, respectively.
The accuracy of cytology and biopsy was 89.
2% and 80.
8%,
respectively.
The combination of the results of brush cytology and biopsy
increased the sensitivity of preoperative diagnostics to 94.
8% which was
significantly higher than sensitivity of biopsy (p < 0.
001), but not than
sensitivity of cytology (p = 0.
102).
Conclusion.
Brush cytology could be a
routine method, along with biopsy, in the diagnosis of colorectal malignancy.
Both methods have comparable both sensitivity and accuracy, and its
combination increases sensitivity of preoperative diagnostics of colorectal
adenocarcinoma, which gives opportunity to better estimation of further
diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
Related Results
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Abstract A13: Applied the proteomics characteristics to detect the inherited colorectal adenomas
Abstract A13: Applied the proteomics characteristics to detect the inherited colorectal adenomas
Abstract
Introduction: Current study found that about one-third of the incidence of colorectal cancer have genetic related. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Clinicopathological Features of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Single-center Cross-sectional Study
Clinicopathological Features of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Single-center Cross-sectional Study
Abstract
Introduction
Due to indeterminate cytology, Bethesda III is the most controversial category within the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. This study exam...
Diagnostic Rate of the Cancer by BDORT Utilizing the Cancer Slide
Diagnostic Rate of the Cancer by BDORT Utilizing the Cancer Slide
Purpose:
To make a diagnosis of cancer with BDORT (resonance test), we can choose two methods. One is to use a chemical agent like Integrin α5β1 or Oncogene C-f...
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Introduction
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used to investigate lymphadenopathy of suspected metastatic origin. The current study aims to find the association be...
Negative Pressure Suction in ERCP Brush Cytology: Assessing its Impact on Biliary Stricture Diagnostics
Negative Pressure Suction in ERCP Brush Cytology: Assessing its Impact on Biliary Stricture Diagnostics
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of negative pressure suction in improving the diagnostic yield of brush cytology for biliary strictures.
Methods: We condu...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...

