Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The value of brush cytology and biopsy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
View through CrossRef
Background/Aim. Although it is well-known the high sensitivity of brush
cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, this kind of
diagnostics is not routinely used, and for the past years it has even been
declining. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of brush
cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma, by comparison the results
of brush cytology and biopsy, and then the results of both diagnostic methods
with the final patohistological diagnosis of colorectal resection. Methods.
This retrospective study included 173 patients with brush cytology of
colorectal region during colonoscopy. In 166 patients concomitant biopsy
specimens were obtained, and in 116 of them resection of the intestine as
well. A total of the 106 patients underwent to all three diagnostic
procedures. Results. Out of 166 patients who went through both brush cytology
and biopsy, the congruent diagnosis was made in 129 (77.7%) patients: in 109
(65.7%) adenocarcinoma was diagnosed, which was confirmed after the resection
of the intestine in 75 of the patients, and in 14 (8.4%) benign lesion, so
there was no need for resection of the intestine. In 6 (3.6%) of the
patients, both cytology and biopsy were negative, but the resected specimen
was malignant. In 10 of the patients with malignant cytology in whom biopsy
was not done, resection of the intestine confirmed malignancy. The
sensitivity of detecting malignancy by brush cytology and biopsy were 87.9%
and 78.3%, respectively (but this difference was not statistically
significant, p = 0.083). Both methods had specificity and positive predictive
values 100%. Negative predictive values for cytology and biopsy were 50% and
37.8%, respectively. The accuracy of cytology and biopsy was 89.2% and 80.8%,
respectively. The combination of the results of brush cytology and biopsy
increased the sensitivity of preoperative diagnostics to 94.8% which was
significantly higher than sensitivity of biopsy (p < 0.001), but not than
sensitivity of cytology (p = 0.102). Conclusion. Brush cytology could be a
routine method, along with biopsy, in the diagnosis of colorectal malignancy.
Both methods have comparable both sensitivity and accuracy, and its
combination increases sensitivity of preoperative diagnostics of colorectal
adenocarcinoma, which gives opportunity to better estimation of further
diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
National Library of Serbia
Title: The value of brush cytology and biopsy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
Description:
Background/Aim.
Although it is well-known the high sensitivity of brush
cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma, this kind of
diagnostics is not routinely used, and for the past years it has even been
declining.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of brush
cytology for the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma, by comparison the results
of brush cytology and biopsy, and then the results of both diagnostic methods
with the final patohistological diagnosis of colorectal resection.
Methods.
This retrospective study included 173 patients with brush cytology of
colorectal region during colonoscopy.
In 166 patients concomitant biopsy
specimens were obtained, and in 116 of them resection of the intestine as
well.
A total of the 106 patients underwent to all three diagnostic
procedures.
Results.
Out of 166 patients who went through both brush cytology
and biopsy, the congruent diagnosis was made in 129 (77.
7%) patients: in 109
(65.
7%) adenocarcinoma was diagnosed, which was confirmed after the resection
of the intestine in 75 of the patients, and in 14 (8.
4%) benign lesion, so
there was no need for resection of the intestine.
In 6 (3.
6%) of the
patients, both cytology and biopsy were negative, but the resected specimen
was malignant.
In 10 of the patients with malignant cytology in whom biopsy
was not done, resection of the intestine confirmed malignancy.
The
sensitivity of detecting malignancy by brush cytology and biopsy were 87.
9%
and 78.
3%, respectively (but this difference was not statistically
significant, p = 0.
083).
Both methods had specificity and positive predictive
values 100%.
Negative predictive values for cytology and biopsy were 50% and
37.
8%, respectively.
The accuracy of cytology and biopsy was 89.
2% and 80.
8%,
respectively.
The combination of the results of brush cytology and biopsy
increased the sensitivity of preoperative diagnostics to 94.
8% which was
significantly higher than sensitivity of biopsy (p < 0.
001), but not than
sensitivity of cytology (p = 0.
102).
Conclusion.
Brush cytology could be a
routine method, along with biopsy, in the diagnosis of colorectal malignancy.
Both methods have comparable both sensitivity and accuracy, and its
combination increases sensitivity of preoperative diagnostics of colorectal
adenocarcinoma, which gives opportunity to better estimation of further
diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
Related Results
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...
Abstract A13: Applied the proteomics characteristics to detect the inherited colorectal adenomas
Abstract A13: Applied the proteomics characteristics to detect the inherited colorectal adenomas
Abstract
Introduction: Current study found that about one-third of the incidence of colorectal cancer have genetic related. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer...
High Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Brush Cytology for Indeterminate Strictures
High Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Brush Cytology for Indeterminate Strictures
Abstract
Background
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) brush cytology is used frequently for sampling indeter...
A275 REVISITING THE DIAGNOSTIC YIELD OF ERCP BRUSH CYTOLOGY FOR INDETERMINATE BILIARY STRICTURES
A275 REVISITING THE DIAGNOSTIC YIELD OF ERCP BRUSH CYTOLOGY FOR INDETERMINATE BILIARY STRICTURES
Abstract
Background
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) brush cytology is the most frequently used tool for sa...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Clinicopathological Features of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Single-center Cross-sectional Study
Clinicopathological Features of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Single-center Cross-sectional Study
Abstract
Introduction
Due to indeterminate cytology, Bethesda III is the most controversial category within the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. This study exam...
Abstract 5777: Functional role of PLK1 in colorectal cancer progression and its potential to chemoresistance
Abstract 5777: Functional role of PLK1 in colorectal cancer progression and its potential to chemoresistance
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
Colorectal cancer is a cancer with high prevalence and mortality rates worldwide, treated with surger...

