Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Spatial Capture–Mark–Resight Estimation of Animal Population Density

View through CrossRef
Summary Sightings of previously marked animals can extend a capture–recapture dataset without the added cost of capturing new animals for marking. Combined marking and resighting methods are therefore an attractive option in animal population studies, and there exist various likelihood-based non-spatial models, and some spatial versions fitted by Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. As implemented to date, the focus has been on modeling sightings only, which requires that the spatial distribution of pre-marked animals is known. We develop a suite of likelihood-based spatial mark–resight models that either include the marking phase (“capture–mark–resight” models) or require a known distribution of marked animals (narrow-sense “mark–resight”). The new models sacrifice some information in the covariance structure of the counts of unmarked animals; estimation is by maximizing a pseudolikelihood with a simulation-based adjustment for overdispersion in the sightings of unmarked animals. Simulations suggest that the resulting estimates of population density have low bias and adequate confidence interval coverage under typical sampling conditions. Further work is needed to specify the conditions under which ignoring covariance results in unacceptable loss of precision, or to modify the pseudolikelihood to include that information. The methods are applied to a study of ship rats Rattus rattus using live traps and video cameras in a New Zealand forest, and to previously published data.
Title: Spatial Capture–Mark–Resight Estimation of Animal Population Density
Description:
Summary Sightings of previously marked animals can extend a capture–recapture dataset without the added cost of capturing new animals for marking.
Combined marking and resighting methods are therefore an attractive option in animal population studies, and there exist various likelihood-based non-spatial models, and some spatial versions fitted by Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling.
As implemented to date, the focus has been on modeling sightings only, which requires that the spatial distribution of pre-marked animals is known.
We develop a suite of likelihood-based spatial mark–resight models that either include the marking phase (“capture–mark–resight” models) or require a known distribution of marked animals (narrow-sense “mark–resight”).
The new models sacrifice some information in the covariance structure of the counts of unmarked animals; estimation is by maximizing a pseudolikelihood with a simulation-based adjustment for overdispersion in the sightings of unmarked animals.
Simulations suggest that the resulting estimates of population density have low bias and adequate confidence interval coverage under typical sampling conditions.
Further work is needed to specify the conditions under which ignoring covariance results in unacceptable loss of precision, or to modify the pseudolikelihood to include that information.
The methods are applied to a study of ship rats Rattus rattus using live traps and video cameras in a New Zealand forest, and to previously published data.

Related Results

Comparing fecal DNA capture‐recapture to mark‐resight for estimating abundance of mule deer on winter ranges
Comparing fecal DNA capture‐recapture to mark‐resight for estimating abundance of mule deer on winter ranges
AbstractMonitoring big game populations is necessary for making well‐informed management decisions. In the eastern Sierra Nevada in California, USA, mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus)...
Costs and Precision of Fecal DNA Mark–Recapture versus Traditional Mark–Resight
Costs and Precision of Fecal DNA Mark–Recapture versus Traditional Mark–Resight
ABSTRACT Wildlife managers often need to estimate population abundance to make well‐informed decisions. However, obtaining such estimates can...
Camera traps and mark‐resight models: The value of ancillary data for evaluating assumptions
Camera traps and mark‐resight models: The value of ancillary data for evaluating assumptions
ABSTRACTUnbiased estimators of abundance and density are fundamental to the study of animal ecology and critical for making sound management decisions. Capture–recapture models are...
A spatial mark–resight model augmented with telemetry data
A spatial mark–resight model augmented with telemetry data
Abundance and population density are fundamental pieces of information for population ecology and species conservation, but they are difficult to estimate for rare and elusive spec...
Generalized spatial mark–resight models with an application to grizzly bears
Generalized spatial mark–resight models with an application to grizzly bears
AbstractThe high cost associated with capture–recapture studies presents a major challenge when monitoring and managing wildlife populations. Recently developed spatial mark–resigh...
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...

Back to Top