Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

ONE- VERSUS TWO-LAYER CLOSURE AT CESAREAN BIRTH

View through CrossRef
 Background: Cesarean delivery is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. The technique of uterine closure plays a significant role in postoperative recovery and future reproductive outcomes. However, the optimal method of uterine closure—whether one-layer or two-layer—remains a topic of ongoing debate, particularly in terms of uterine healing, surgical complications, and maternal outcomes. Aim: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of one-layer versus two-layer uterine closure techniques following cesarean birth. Methods: This comparative observational study was conducted at Bilawal medical College at LUMHS Jamshoro, from October 2023 to September 2024. A total of 100 women who underwent cesarean sections were included in the study. The research participants formed two comparable groups through uterine closure methods. Group A received one-layer closure while Group B underwent a two-layer closure. Operative time along with estimated blood loss and postoperative pain and febrile morbidity and wound complications were among the collected and analyzed intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Results: The research showed the operative time for the one-layer closure group was dramatically shorter than the two-layer closure group (p < 0.05). The two treatment groups showed similar results in terms of estimated blood loss together with febrile morbidity and wound complications. The one-layer group had a slightly lower pain score after surgery but the observed difference lacked clinical importance. Conclusion: One-layer uterine closure required less operative time but did not raise the risk of short-term complications after surgery. Research indicates that the one-layer closure method stands as a secure alternative for performing cesarean section delivery which reduces procedure time when compared to standard two-layer techniques. Additional research must evaluate what effects one-layer uterine closure may have on uterine health for future pregnancies.
Title: ONE- VERSUS TWO-LAYER CLOSURE AT CESAREAN BIRTH
Description:
 Background: Cesarean delivery is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide.
The technique of uterine closure plays a significant role in postoperative recovery and future reproductive outcomes.
However, the optimal method of uterine closure—whether one-layer or two-layer—remains a topic of ongoing debate, particularly in terms of uterine healing, surgical complications, and maternal outcomes.
Aim: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of one-layer versus two-layer uterine closure techniques following cesarean birth.
Methods: This comparative observational study was conducted at Bilawal medical College at LUMHS Jamshoro, from October 2023 to September 2024.
A total of 100 women who underwent cesarean sections were included in the study.
The research participants formed two comparable groups through uterine closure methods.
Group A received one-layer closure while Group B underwent a two-layer closure.
Operative time along with estimated blood loss and postoperative pain and febrile morbidity and wound complications were among the collected and analyzed intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.
Results: The research showed the operative time for the one-layer closure group was dramatically shorter than the two-layer closure group (p < 0.
05).
The two treatment groups showed similar results in terms of estimated blood loss together with febrile morbidity and wound complications.
The one-layer group had a slightly lower pain score after surgery but the observed difference lacked clinical importance.
Conclusion: One-layer uterine closure required less operative time but did not raise the risk of short-term complications after surgery.
Research indicates that the one-layer closure method stands as a secure alternative for performing cesarean section delivery which reduces procedure time when compared to standard two-layer techniques.
Additional research must evaluate what effects one-layer uterine closure may have on uterine health for future pregnancies.

Related Results

ONE- VERSUS TWO-LAYER CLOSURE AT CESAREAN BIRTH
ONE- VERSUS TWO-LAYER CLOSURE AT CESAREAN BIRTH
Background: Cesarean delivery is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. The technique of uterine closure plays a significant role in postoperative recove...
Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia
Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia
Background: One of the primary reasons for an increase in cesarean sections is obstetricians’ uncertainty about labor trial safety following a previous cesarean section. The succes...
ONE- VERSUS TWO-LAYER CLOSURE AT CESAREAN BIRTH
ONE- VERSUS TWO-LAYER CLOSURE AT CESAREAN BIRTH
Background: Cesarean delivery is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. The technique of uterine closure plays a significant role in postoperative recove...
Single Versus Double Layer Uterine Closure Technique According to Development of Uterine Niche: A Literature Review
Single Versus Double Layer Uterine Closure Technique According to Development of Uterine Niche: A Literature Review
Prevalence of cesarean deliveries increases globally. The prevalence of cesarean births increased from 5% in 1970 to 31.9% in 2016. There are short term and long-term complications...
Subcutaneous tissue closure technique during cesarean delivery: Don’t interrupt, better continue
Subcutaneous tissue closure technique during cesarean delivery: Don’t interrupt, better continue
Objectives: To determine the rates of surgical site infections following continuous as compared to interrupted subcutaneous tissue closure technique ‎during cesarean delivery. Desi...

Back to Top