Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Health Professional Perspectives on Clinical Outcomes in UK Orthotic Practice

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background: Despite potential savings to the National Health Service, the collection of data on outcomes of NHS orthotic services is patchy. Indeed, several reports into orthotic services in the UK have reported a lack of data relating to outcomes of care and highlighted the need to routinely record outcomes to demonstrate efficacy of services. This research aimed to explore orthotic service professional perspectives on outcomes in orthotic practice. A secondary aim was to explore potential barriers to the routine use of outcome measure tools in practice.Methods: Following a review of the literature, an initial advisory group involving experts in the field was conducted. From this, semi-structured questions were developed, and a focus group was undertaken. Data from the focus group was transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis, creating themes and subthemes for discussion.Results: The participants considered a successful outcome as a ‘usable’ orthosis, this linked to a preference for evaluation of patient reported outcomes. The setting of realistic joint goals via patient education was seen as a method of improving outcomes. Barriers to collection of data were associated with inadequate technology to manage the ‘data burden’, lack of clinical time to complete and difficulties selecting outcome measure tools for a varied population. Issues around usability of current outcome measure tools were also highlighted. Participants discussed ways of addressing these barriers, such as the use of ‘snapshots’ and delegation of data collection. Conclusions:This research is unique in that it is the first-time orthotic service professional opinions have been analysed specifically relating to outcomes, outcome measure tools and possible barriers to their use. The participants acknowledged the relevance of outcome measure tools, identified barriers to use but had created novel ways to address barriers. Further, they indicated that to achieve good outcomes it was important to address service user expectations of treatment, discuss and establish joint goals for care at the outset and communicate/ educate on the clinical reasoning process. This research has contributed to current knowledge within the field of orthotics and may provide a theoretical basis for future research in the field.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Health Professional Perspectives on Clinical Outcomes in UK Orthotic Practice
Description:
Abstract Background: Despite potential savings to the National Health Service, the collection of data on outcomes of NHS orthotic services is patchy.
Indeed, several reports into orthotic services in the UK have reported a lack of data relating to outcomes of care and highlighted the need to routinely record outcomes to demonstrate efficacy of services.
This research aimed to explore orthotic service professional perspectives on outcomes in orthotic practice.
A secondary aim was to explore potential barriers to the routine use of outcome measure tools in practice.
Methods: Following a review of the literature, an initial advisory group involving experts in the field was conducted.
From this, semi-structured questions were developed, and a focus group was undertaken.
Data from the focus group was transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis, creating themes and subthemes for discussion.
Results: The participants considered a successful outcome as a ‘usable’ orthosis, this linked to a preference for evaluation of patient reported outcomes.
The setting of realistic joint goals via patient education was seen as a method of improving outcomes.
Barriers to collection of data were associated with inadequate technology to manage the ‘data burden’, lack of clinical time to complete and difficulties selecting outcome measure tools for a varied population.
Issues around usability of current outcome measure tools were also highlighted.
Participants discussed ways of addressing these barriers, such as the use of ‘snapshots’ and delegation of data collection.
Conclusions:This research is unique in that it is the first-time orthotic service professional opinions have been analysed specifically relating to outcomes, outcome measure tools and possible barriers to their use.
The participants acknowledged the relevance of outcome measure tools, identified barriers to use but had created novel ways to address barriers.
Further, they indicated that to achieve good outcomes it was important to address service user expectations of treatment, discuss and establish joint goals for care at the outset and communicate/ educate on the clinical reasoning process.
This research has contributed to current knowledge within the field of orthotics and may provide a theoretical basis for future research in the field.

Related Results

A Qualitative Study of User Perspectives on Outcomes of Orthotic Interventions
A Qualitative Study of User Perspectives on Outcomes of Orthotic Interventions
Abstract Background: Orthotic services offer various health benefits and it is estimated that for every £1 spent on orthotic care the savings to the NHS are up to £4. Sever...
Current Status of Prosthetic and Orthotic Rehabilitation Services in India: Its Issues and Challenges
Current Status of Prosthetic and Orthotic Rehabilitation Services in India: Its Issues and Challenges
Introduction: The study purpose is to identify the issues and challenges of the Prosthetic and Orthotic (P&O) rehabilitation services in IndiaMaterial and Methods: The online s...
Orthotic Intervention for Ageing Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Brief Review
Orthotic Intervention for Ageing Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Brief Review
Background and aim: The lifespan of individuals with spinal cord injury has increased significantly for the past decade due to improved healthcare and rehabilitation. However, agei...
An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Health Professional Perspectives on Clinical Outcomes in UK Orthotic Practice
An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Health Professional Perspectives on Clinical Outcomes in UK Orthotic Practice
Abstract Background: Despite potential savings to the National Health Service, the collection of data on outcomes of NHS orthotic services is patchy. Indeed, several report...
Orthotic Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review
Orthotic Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review
Abstract Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a major complication of diabetes mellitus, contributing substantiall...
Przestępca zawodowy
Przestępca zawodowy
 The article seeks to sum up all that has been said on the subject of professional criminality in the past half-century. It was never any part of the author’s aim to offer an analy...
SOCIALINIO DARBUOTOJO PROFESINĖS VEIKLOS PRADŽIA: VEIKSNIAI SĄLYGOJANTYS VEIKSMINGĄ PROFESINĘ ADAPTACIJĄ
SOCIALINIO DARBUOTOJO PROFESINĖS VEIKLOS PRADŽIA: VEIKSNIAI SĄLYGOJANTYS VEIKSMINGĄ PROFESINĘ ADAPTACIJĄ
Starting a career in social work is a complex stage that requires the application of theoretical knowledge to practical situations, as well as the development of professional, pers...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...

Back to Top