Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Greco-Roman Revival
View through CrossRef
During the eighteenth century an emergent historicism, which differentiated modernity radically from past ages, questioned the traditional notion of a ‘classical tradition’ of timeless values exemplified in Greek and Roman works. Classical antiquity began to be understood as a repository of historical artefacts associated, in part nostalgically, with ‘primitive’ ways of thought. Such recognition of the distance between modernity and antiquity paradoxically encouraged identification with the latter, since antiquarian research permitted increasingly accurate imitation of classical forms in the visual arts from the 1750s, while anthropological reflection on myth stimulated a revival of mythological poetry from the 1810s. Yet British Romantic poetry, whether describing classical artworks or appropriating classical myths, engaged with classical antiquity ambivalently, often ironically. While espousing the Philhellenist cause of Greek independence from Ottoman rule, Byron and Shelley remained very conscious of the disparities between ancient and modern Greece.
Title: The Greco-Roman Revival
Description:
During the eighteenth century an emergent historicism, which differentiated modernity radically from past ages, questioned the traditional notion of a ‘classical tradition’ of timeless values exemplified in Greek and Roman works.
Classical antiquity began to be understood as a repository of historical artefacts associated, in part nostalgically, with ‘primitive’ ways of thought.
Such recognition of the distance between modernity and antiquity paradoxically encouraged identification with the latter, since antiquarian research permitted increasingly accurate imitation of classical forms in the visual arts from the 1750s, while anthropological reflection on myth stimulated a revival of mythological poetry from the 1810s.
Yet British Romantic poetry, whether describing classical artworks or appropriating classical myths, engaged with classical antiquity ambivalently, often ironically.
While espousing the Philhellenist cause of Greek independence from Ottoman rule, Byron and Shelley remained very conscious of the disparities between ancient and modern Greece.
Related Results
The English Plainchant Revival
The English Plainchant Revival
Abstract
This study provides a general introduction to the sources of the plainchant revival in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century England. Part I examines the ei...
The Pictorial Art of El Greco
The Pictorial Art of El Greco
The Pictorial Art of El Greco: Transmaterialities, Temporalities, and Media investigates El Greco’s pictorial art as foundational to the globalising trends manifested in the visual...
City Government In Hellenistic and Roman Asia Minor
City Government In Hellenistic and Roman Asia Minor
Abstract
City Government in Hellenistic and Roman Asia Minor examines the social and administrative transformation of Greek society within the early Roman empire,...
Imperial Power, Provincial Government, and the Emergence of Roman Asia, 133 BCE-14 CE
Imperial Power, Provincial Government, and the Emergence of Roman Asia, 133 BCE-14 CE
AbstractWhat ambitions lay behind Roman provincial governance? How did these change over time and in response to local conditions? To what extent did local agents facilitate and co...
Roman Soldier vs Dacian Warrior
Roman Soldier vs Dacian Warrior
Fully illustrated, this book assesses the Roman and Dacian fighting men who clashed in three bloody encounters during the Dacian Wars of AD 85–106.
While the Roma...
Money in Imperial Rome
Money in Imperial Rome
Abstract
This book examines the institutional framework of money as an economic agent in imperial Rome, emphasizing its systemic complexity. Analyses focus on Roman ...
A Noble Ruin
A Noble Ruin
Abstract
This book narrates the life and career of Mark Antony, which it sets against its contemporary social and cultural background. The origins and rise of the An...
Carthaginian Empire
Carthaginian Empire
The Carthaginian Empire: 550 – 202 BCE argues for a new history of the Phoenician polity. In contrast to previous studies of the Carthaginian Empire that privileged evidence from G...

