Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Prognosis of Urothelial Carcinoma Between Kidney Transplantation Recipients and Normal Patients: A Propensity Score‐Matched Study
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
Objective
To evaluate the difference in the characteristics and prognosis between kidney transplantation (KT) recipients and normal patients with urothelial carcinoma.
Method
We retrospectively reviewed the characteristics of the kidney‐transplanted patients and the general patients who were diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma between 2013 and 2021. The non‐kidney transplantation (NKT) group is matched with the KT group through propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for confounders. We evaluated the prognosis including overall survival (OS), relapse‐free survival (RFS), and progression‐free survival (PFS). We compared the difference in the prognosis between the two groups using Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log‐rank test.
Result
The characteristics of 344 NKT patients and 42 KT recipients with urothelial carcinoma were included in this research. The percentage of females was significantly higher in the KT group than in the NKT group (
p
< 0.001). Tumors mostly occurred in the upper tract in the KT group and in the bladder cancer (BC) in the NKT group. After propensity score matching (PSM), overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the KT group with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) than in the NKT group (
p
= 0.001), whereas recurrence‐free survival and progression‐free survival (PFS) were significantly lower in the KT group with UTUC+BC than in the NKT group (
p
= 0.028, 0.044).
Conclusion
Patients with tumors that occur in both the bladder and upper urinary tract have a worse prognosis. Kidney transplantation recipients with only bladder or upper urinary tract UC have a prognosis that is no worse or even better than that of NKT patients.
Title: The Prognosis of Urothelial Carcinoma Between Kidney Transplantation Recipients and Normal Patients: A Propensity Score‐Matched Study
Description:
ABSTRACT
Objective
To evaluate the difference in the characteristics and prognosis between kidney transplantation (KT) recipients and normal patients with urothelial carcinoma.
Method
We retrospectively reviewed the characteristics of the kidney‐transplanted patients and the general patients who were diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma between 2013 and 2021.
The non‐kidney transplantation (NKT) group is matched with the KT group through propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for confounders.
We evaluated the prognosis including overall survival (OS), relapse‐free survival (RFS), and progression‐free survival (PFS).
We compared the difference in the prognosis between the two groups using Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log‐rank test.
Result
The characteristics of 344 NKT patients and 42 KT recipients with urothelial carcinoma were included in this research.
The percentage of females was significantly higher in the KT group than in the NKT group (
p
< 0.
001).
Tumors mostly occurred in the upper tract in the KT group and in the bladder cancer (BC) in the NKT group.
After propensity score matching (PSM), overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the KT group with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) than in the NKT group (
p
= 0.
001), whereas recurrence‐free survival and progression‐free survival (PFS) were significantly lower in the KT group with UTUC+BC than in the NKT group (
p
= 0.
028, 0.
044).
Conclusion
Patients with tumors that occur in both the bladder and upper urinary tract have a worse prognosis.
Kidney transplantation recipients with only bladder or upper urinary tract UC have a prognosis that is no worse or even better than that of NKT patients.
Related Results
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
BackgroundA clinical dilemma exists in patients with CKD, ESKD, and after kidney transplantation, as they face concurrent risks of both thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Prognostic and Diagnostic Significance of Platelet Indices in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma
Prognostic and Diagnostic Significance of Platelet Indices in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma
Some prognostic markers have been shown to determine the course and survival of Urothelial Cancer. A cross-sectional retrospective study, specifically looking at the role that vari...
Epstein–Barr virus DNA load in tumour tissues correlates with poor differentiation status in non‐muscle invasive urothelial carcinomas
Epstein–Barr virus DNA load in tumour tissues correlates with poor differentiation status in non‐muscle invasive urothelial carcinomas
What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add?
Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) could be detected in bladder cancer. In our paper, we sh...
Urothelial Carcinoma Arising on a Functional Kidney Graft
Urothelial Carcinoma Arising on a Functional Kidney Graft
Introduction: Kidney transplant recipients present a higher risk of developing malignancies than the general population. Malignancies represent the third leading cause of death for...
Carcinoma ex Pleomorphic Adenoma: A Case Series and Literature Review
Carcinoma ex Pleomorphic Adenoma: A Case Series and Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA) is a rare malignant salivary gland tumor that can lead to severe complications and carries a risk of distant metastasi...
On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background:#f9f9f4"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><b><spa...

