Javascript must be enabled to continue!
β Blockers in heart failure: a comparison of a vasodilating β blocker with metoprolol
View through CrossRef
Objective
To determine whether a third generation vasodilating β blocker (celiprolol) has long term clinical advantages over metoprolol in patients with chronic heart failure.
Design
A double blind placebo controlled randomised trial.
Setting
University teaching Hospital.
Patients
50 patients with stable chronic heart failure (NYHA class II-IV) due to idiopathic dilated, ischaemic, or hypertensive cardiomyopathy, with left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.45.
Interventions
Celiprolol 200 mg daily (n = 21), metoprolol 50 mg twice daily (n = 19), or placebo (n = 10) for three months with a four week dose titration period. After the double blind period, patients entered an open label study (with placebo group receiving β blockers) and were assessed after one year.
Main outcome measures
Clinical response, efficacy, and tolerance were assessed by the Minnesota heart failure symptom questionnaire, six minute walk test, Doppler echocardiography (systolic and diastolic function), radionuclide ventriculography, and atrial and brain natriuretic peptides measured at baseline and after three months.
Results
In the metoprolol group at 12 weeksv baseline there was a 47% reduction in symptom score (p < 0.001), improvement of NYHA class (mean (SEM), 2.6 (0.12) to 1.9 (0.13), p = 0.001), exercise distance (1246 (54) to 1402 (52) feet, p < 0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction (26.9(3.1)% to 31(3.0)%, p = 0.016), and a fall in heart rate (resting, 79 (3) to 62 (3) beats/min, p < 0.001). In the celiprolol group there was a 38% reduction in symptom score (p = 0.02), less improvement in exercise distance (1191 (55) to 1256 (61) feet, p = 0.05), and no significant changes in NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction, or heart rate. Mortality at one year was 11% in metoprolol and 19% in the celiprolol group, and symptomatic improvement was maintained in the survivors.
Conclusions
Both drugs were well tolerated but the vasodilator properties of celiprolol do not seem to provide any obvious additional benefit in the long term treatment of heart failure.
Title: β Blockers in heart failure: a comparison of a vasodilating β blocker with metoprolol
Description:
Objective
To determine whether a third generation vasodilating β blocker (celiprolol) has long term clinical advantages over metoprolol in patients with chronic heart failure.
Design
A double blind placebo controlled randomised trial.
Setting
University teaching Hospital.
Patients
50 patients with stable chronic heart failure (NYHA class II-IV) due to idiopathic dilated, ischaemic, or hypertensive cardiomyopathy, with left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.
45.
Interventions
Celiprolol 200 mg daily (n = 21), metoprolol 50 mg twice daily (n = 19), or placebo (n = 10) for three months with a four week dose titration period.
After the double blind period, patients entered an open label study (with placebo group receiving β blockers) and were assessed after one year.
Main outcome measures
Clinical response, efficacy, and tolerance were assessed by the Minnesota heart failure symptom questionnaire, six minute walk test, Doppler echocardiography (systolic and diastolic function), radionuclide ventriculography, and atrial and brain natriuretic peptides measured at baseline and after three months.
Results
In the metoprolol group at 12 weeksv baseline there was a 47% reduction in symptom score (p < 0.
001), improvement of NYHA class (mean (SEM), 2.
6 (0.
12) to 1.
9 (0.
13), p = 0.
001), exercise distance (1246 (54) to 1402 (52) feet, p < 0.
001), and left ventricular ejection fraction (26.
9(3.
1)% to 31(3.
0)%, p = 0.
016), and a fall in heart rate (resting, 79 (3) to 62 (3) beats/min, p < 0.
001).
In the celiprolol group there was a 38% reduction in symptom score (p = 0.
02), less improvement in exercise distance (1191 (55) to 1256 (61) feet, p = 0.
05), and no significant changes in NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction, or heart rate.
Mortality at one year was 11% in metoprolol and 19% in the celiprolol group, and symptomatic improvement was maintained in the survivors.
Conclusions
Both drugs were well tolerated but the vasodilator properties of celiprolol do not seem to provide any obvious additional benefit in the long term treatment of heart failure.
Related Results
COMPARISON OF ORAL IVABRADINE AND METOPROLOL FOR CONTROL OF HEART RATE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CT CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY
COMPARISON OF ORAL IVABRADINE AND METOPROLOL FOR CONTROL OF HEART RATE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CT CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY
Objectives
Optimisation of heart rate (HR) to limit motion artefacts is mandatory in all patients undergoing CT coronary angiography (CTCA). Despite use of β-bloc...
e0680 Relationship between polymorphism of ACE and the curative effect of metoprolol on chronic heart failure
e0680 Relationship between polymorphism of ACE and the curative effect of metoprolol on chronic heart failure
Objective
To investigate the effect of metoprolol on chronic heart failure and to discuss the relationship between polymorphism of ACE and the curative effect of ...
Ketamine-induced ventricular structural, sympathetic and electrophysiologic remodelling: pathological consequences and protective effects of metoprolol
Ketamine-induced ventricular structural, sympathetic and electrophysiologic remodelling: pathological consequences and protective effects of metoprolol
Purpose
Growing evidence suggested long-term abuse of ketamine did harm to the heart and increased the risk of sudden death. The present study was performed to ex...
Does NT‐proBNP Remain a Sensitive Biomarker for Chronic Heart Failure after Administration of a Beta‐blocker?
Does NT‐proBNP Remain a Sensitive Biomarker for Chronic Heart Failure after Administration of a Beta‐blocker?
AbstractBackgroundBeta‐blockers exert complex effects on plasma N‐terminal‐pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) level.HypothesisWe aimed to investigate whether NT‐proBNP was ...
The impact of beta‐receptor blocker addition to high‐dose angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor‐nitrate therapy in heart failure
The impact of beta‐receptor blocker addition to high‐dose angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor‐nitrate therapy in heart failure
AbstractBackground: The natural history of heart failure is one of continued worsening of cardiac function. Beta‐receptor blocker therapy has been effective in improving clinical s...
A meta-analysis of wenxin granule and metoprolol for the treatment of coronary heart disease and arrhythmia
A meta-analysis of wenxin granule and metoprolol for the treatment of coronary heart disease and arrhythmia
Background:
This meta-analysis aimed to systematically and comprehensively assess the effectiveness and safety of wenxin granule (WXG) and metoprolol in the treatment o...
Beta-blocker use is associated with prevention of left ventricular remodeling in recovered dilated cardiomyopathy
Beta-blocker use is associated with prevention of left ventricular remodeling in recovered dilated cardiomyopathy
Abstract
Background
Withdrawal of optimal medical therapy has been reported to relapse cardiac dysfunction in patients with dila...
Efficacy and Safety of Beta Blockers for Patients with Myocardial Infarction in the Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and Safety of Beta Blockers for Patients with Myocardial Infarction in the Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background
Beta-blockers are commonly prescribed to patients after MI. However, the evidence is based on studies condu...

