Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

THE RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION WHEN APPEARING BEFORE A DISCIPLINARY ENQUIRY Hamata v Chairperson, Peninsula Technikon Internal Disciplinary Committee 2002 7 BCLR 756 (SCA)

View through CrossRef
Given the present work climate in South Africa, it can no longer be assumed that after completing tertiary education, a graduate is automatically assured of employment in his or her field of study. Opportunities are scarce and the supply generally outweighs the demand. It is therefore no surprise that any future candidate for the job market would prefer to keep his or her education record clean.The possible consequences of a disciplinary enquiry have the potential to impact on the record of the student concerned. Such a student will put up the strongest possible defence at such an enquiry, and the question arises as to whether or not the student should be entitled to acquire the services of a legal representative to serve his or her best interests.At the same time, seen from the viewpoint of a tertiary institution, the preference may well be to keep the enquiry a domestic affair and not allow the intervention of an outsider who may cause the enquiry to be prolonged, or show the chairperson or initiator of the enquiry, often a layperson, to be inadequately skilled when compared with a legal practitioner.The question of the right to representation at a disciplinary enquiry of an employee arises for similar reasons, and it happens more often.In the present constitutional dispensation it cannot be assumed that the right to legal representation at disciplinary enquiries is only established by contractual agreement (individual or collective), or by an express provision in some legislative enactment, or even that such agreement or enactment may lawfully prohibit legal representation at enquiries. In the recent judgment in Hamata v Chairperson, Peninsula Technikon Internal Disciplinary Committee (supra; hereinafter “Hamata”) handed down by the Supreme Court of Appeal this issue of legal representation at disciplinary enquiries was considered and addressed.  
Academy of Science of South Africa
Title: THE RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION WHEN APPEARING BEFORE A DISCIPLINARY ENQUIRY Hamata v Chairperson, Peninsula Technikon Internal Disciplinary Committee 2002 7 BCLR 756 (SCA)
Description:
Given the present work climate in South Africa, it can no longer be assumed that after completing tertiary education, a graduate is automatically assured of employment in his or her field of study.
Opportunities are scarce and the supply generally outweighs the demand.
It is therefore no surprise that any future candidate for the job market would prefer to keep his or her education record clean.
The possible consequences of a disciplinary enquiry have the potential to impact on the record of the student concerned.
Such a student will put up the strongest possible defence at such an enquiry, and the question arises as to whether or not the student should be entitled to acquire the services of a legal representative to serve his or her best interests.
At the same time, seen from the viewpoint of a tertiary institution, the preference may well be to keep the enquiry a domestic affair and not allow the intervention of an outsider who may cause the enquiry to be prolonged, or show the chairperson or initiator of the enquiry, often a layperson, to be inadequately skilled when compared with a legal practitioner.
The question of the right to representation at a disciplinary enquiry of an employee arises for similar reasons, and it happens more often.
In the present constitutional dispensation it cannot be assumed that the right to legal representation at disciplinary enquiries is only established by contractual agreement (individual or collective), or by an express provision in some legislative enactment, or even that such agreement or enactment may lawfully prohibit legal representation at enquiries.
In the recent judgment in Hamata v Chairperson, Peninsula Technikon Internal Disciplinary Committee (supra; hereinafter “Hamata”) handed down by the Supreme Court of Appeal this issue of legal representation at disciplinary enquiries was considered and addressed.
 .

Related Results

Recurrent Sudden Cardiac Arrest in the General Population
Recurrent Sudden Cardiac Arrest in the General Population
Objective: To evaluate the burden and determinants of recurrent out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in the community.<br><br>Background: Despite improvements in...
Evaluation of the Response of Sickle Cell Disease in Steady State to Anaemia
Evaluation of the Response of Sickle Cell Disease in Steady State to Anaemia
Abstract BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disease characterized by episodes of crises interrupted by periods of relatively stable clinical state known as ...
Prevalence of concealed arrhythmogenic substrate for sudden cardiac arrest in the general population
Prevalence of concealed arrhythmogenic substrate for sudden cardiac arrest in the general population
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): US Na...
British Food Journal Volume 46 Issue 11 1944
British Food Journal Volume 46 Issue 11 1944
1. From the information given to the Committee by members of the trade the following conclusions were drawn : (i) Four main types of product are sold under a name commonly includin...

Back to Top