Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Mind Causality: A Computational Neuroscience Approach

View through CrossRef
A neuroscience-based approach has recently been proposed for the relation between the mind and the brain. The proposal is that events at the sub-neuronal, neuronal, and neuronal network levels take place simultaneously to perform a computation that can be described at a high level as a mental state, with content about the world. It is argued that as the processes at the different levels of explanation take place at the same time, they are linked by a non-causal supervenient relationship: causality can best be described in brains as operating within but not between levels. This mind-brain theory allows mental events to be different in kind from the mechanistic events that underlie them; but does not lead one to argue that mental events cause brain events, or vice versa: they are different levels of explanation of the operation of the computational system. Here, some implications are developed. It is proposed that causality, at least as it applies to the brain, should satisfy three conditions. First, interventionist tests for causality must be satisfied. Second, the causally related events should be at the same level of explanation. Third, a temporal order condition must be satisfied, with a suitable time scale in the order of 10 ms (to exclude application to quantum physics; and a cause cannot follow an effect). Next, although it may be useful for different purposes to describe causality involving the mind and brain at the mental level, or at the brain level, it is argued that the brain level may sometimes be more accurate, for sometimes causal accounts at the mental level may arise from confabulation by the mentalee, whereas understanding exactly what computations have occurred in the brain that result in a choice or action will provide the correct causal account for why a choice or action was made. Next, it is argued that possible cases of “downward causation” can be accounted for by a within-levels-of-explanation account of causality. This computational neuroscience approach provides an opportunity to proceed beyond Cartesian dualism and physical reductionism in considering the relations between the mind and the brain.
Title: Mind Causality: A Computational Neuroscience Approach
Description:
A neuroscience-based approach has recently been proposed for the relation between the mind and the brain.
The proposal is that events at the sub-neuronal, neuronal, and neuronal network levels take place simultaneously to perform a computation that can be described at a high level as a mental state, with content about the world.
It is argued that as the processes at the different levels of explanation take place at the same time, they are linked by a non-causal supervenient relationship: causality can best be described in brains as operating within but not between levels.
This mind-brain theory allows mental events to be different in kind from the mechanistic events that underlie them; but does not lead one to argue that mental events cause brain events, or vice versa: they are different levels of explanation of the operation of the computational system.
Here, some implications are developed.
It is proposed that causality, at least as it applies to the brain, should satisfy three conditions.
First, interventionist tests for causality must be satisfied.
Second, the causally related events should be at the same level of explanation.
Third, a temporal order condition must be satisfied, with a suitable time scale in the order of 10 ms (to exclude application to quantum physics; and a cause cannot follow an effect).
Next, although it may be useful for different purposes to describe causality involving the mind and brain at the mental level, or at the brain level, it is argued that the brain level may sometimes be more accurate, for sometimes causal accounts at the mental level may arise from confabulation by the mentalee, whereas understanding exactly what computations have occurred in the brain that result in a choice or action will provide the correct causal account for why a choice or action was made.
Next, it is argued that possible cases of “downward causation” can be accounted for by a within-levels-of-explanation account of causality.
This computational neuroscience approach provides an opportunity to proceed beyond Cartesian dualism and physical reductionism in considering the relations between the mind and the brain.

Related Results

The relationship between money supply and inflation: analysis with PANELVAR approach
The relationship between money supply and inflation: analysis with PANELVAR approach
Purpose- Central banks serve as institutions responsible for executing monetary policy in countries, with the primary objective of managing the money supply and ensuring price stab...
The wandering mind, the focussed mind and the meta-aware mind
The wandering mind, the focussed mind and the meta-aware mind
Caught within fast paced- urban industrial society, many of us may not ask questions about the nature of our mind, thoughts, although our mind, and thoughts often cause distress to...
The motifs of radical embodied neuroscience
The motifs of radical embodied neuroscience
AbstractIn this paper, I analyse how the emerging scientific framework of radical embodied neuroscience is different from contemporary mainstream cognitive neuroscience. To do so, ...
Contributions of Neuroscience to Educational Praxis: A Systematic Review
Contributions of Neuroscience to Educational Praxis: A Systematic Review
Objectives: In education, neuroscience is an interdisciplinary research field. It seeks to improve educational practice by applying brain research findings. Additional findings fro...
Towards Explainable Deep Learning in Computational Neuroscience: Visual and Clinical Applications
Towards Explainable Deep Learning in Computational Neuroscience: Visual and Clinical Applications
Deep learning has emerged as a powerful tool in computational neuroscience, enabling the modeling of complex neural processes and supporting data-driven insights into brain functio...
Buddhist Theories of Causality (karma, pratītyasamutpāda, hetu, pratyaya)
Buddhist Theories of Causality (karma, pratītyasamutpāda, hetu, pratyaya)
This entry covers four models of causality: karma, pratītyasamutpāda, hetu, and pratyaya. The English terms causality and causation are used here as generic terms. As Buddhist inte...
Avicenna’s Ideas and Arguments about Mind and Brain Interaction
Avicenna’s Ideas and Arguments about Mind and Brain Interaction
Mind and brain/matter interaction is one of the important and controversial issues in Islamic philosophy. In fact, in the resources of Islamic philosophy, one of the basic parts of...
Granger Causality Analysi̇s of Forei̇gn Trade İmpact on Economi̇c Growth and Some Socioeconomic Indicators: Case of Azerbaijan
Granger Causality Analysi̇s of Forei̇gn Trade İmpact on Economi̇c Growth and Some Socioeconomic Indicators: Case of Azerbaijan
The main purpose of the investigation is to define the existence of the causality relationship between foreign trade and some macroeconomic indicators in Azerbaijan. There was used...

Back to Top