Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Andrew/Cyrus Horizontal Well Completions

View through CrossRef
Abstract The Andrew Field produces from a Palaeocene sandstone saturated oil reservoir, in UK North Sea Blocks 16/27a and 16/28. Cyrus is a small subsea tieback, 7km NE of Andrew, containing undersaturated oil. Both fields are operated by BP Exploration. Field development was sanctioned in 1994, some 20 years after discovery. During those 20 years, numerous development concepts failed to achieve the expected economic return. However, in 1992 the Andrew well count was reduced from 18 to 10 by changing from vertical to horizontal producers. In conjunction with an Alliance risk/reward approach to topsides construction, which was expected to significantly reduce Capex, development sanction was obtained. Andrew development drilling started in September 1995, with three pre-drilled template wells. These were tied-back to the platform in 1996 and followed by further platform-drilled producers. A 1993 horizontal appraisal well was also tied back as an Andrew producer. Two horizontal subsea producers were drilled on Cyrus in 1996, replacing two earlier horizontals wells which had suffered rapid water production. First oil was achieved in June 1996, 6 months ahead of programme. Current production is at the expected plateau level of about 58 000 bbl/D from Andrew and 12 000 bbl/D from Cyrus. Reducing well numbers and using only horizontal wells relies on the long term performance of these wells for economic success. Andrew/Cyrus is amongst BP's first all-horizontal field developments. Key design decisions started at the sandface completion: openhole sand control screens were considered because of sand production concerns; the cost and difficulties of cementing and perforating long horizontal liners were reviewed; the savings from using pre-holed, uncemented liners were set against the concerns over long-term production and external casing packer (ECP) reliability. Multilaterals were also considered in detail. The outcome of this work was to install pre-holed liners with cement inflated ECP's in both Cyrus wells, but to use cemented and perforated liners on Andrew. The Andrew Well Engineering Alliance was created, and was aligned to BP's key business objectives through the 'minimum performance standards' of well on target, % of the horizontal section contributing to flow, zonal isolation and data acquisition. These measures were the basis of triggers for gainshare payments. Maximising the % contributing to flow led to the world's first through-tubing, underbalanced, single trip, no kill, horizontal perforating system using a hydraulic workover unit and formation isolation valve. The success of this approach has been confirmed by recent coiled tubing production logging (CT-PLT). This paper discusses the reservoir uncertainties and anticipated well management challenges. It describes the balance of factors that impacted the design of the horizontal completions. Initial well construction experiences and the first 6 months of production are described. Development Outline Figure 1 gives an outline of the development area. The Andrew topsides were installed in May 1996, with the gas and oil export pipelines and subsea bundle tie-back of Cyrus completed a few weeks later. Andrew reserves are estimated at 112 × 106 bbl. Development drilling on Cyrus has suggested that the sanction estimate of 24 × 106 bbl was optimistic, with the structure being somewhat smaller than expected. Cyrus 're-development' is through primary depletion from two new horizontal wells, replacing the previous horizontals. The Andrew reservoir, a four-way dip-closed structure with a 58m oil column between gas cap and aquifer, is being developed with ten horizontal producers. It is expected that aquifer support will be sufficient to maintain reservoir pressure. Whilst the development includes a vertical gas management well completed in the gas cap, there are no plans for water or gas injection wells for pressure maintenance.
Title: Andrew/Cyrus Horizontal Well Completions
Description:
Abstract The Andrew Field produces from a Palaeocene sandstone saturated oil reservoir, in UK North Sea Blocks 16/27a and 16/28.
Cyrus is a small subsea tieback, 7km NE of Andrew, containing undersaturated oil.
Both fields are operated by BP Exploration.
Field development was sanctioned in 1994, some 20 years after discovery.
During those 20 years, numerous development concepts failed to achieve the expected economic return.
However, in 1992 the Andrew well count was reduced from 18 to 10 by changing from vertical to horizontal producers.
In conjunction with an Alliance risk/reward approach to topsides construction, which was expected to significantly reduce Capex, development sanction was obtained.
Andrew development drilling started in September 1995, with three pre-drilled template wells.
These were tied-back to the platform in 1996 and followed by further platform-drilled producers.
A 1993 horizontal appraisal well was also tied back as an Andrew producer.
Two horizontal subsea producers were drilled on Cyrus in 1996, replacing two earlier horizontals wells which had suffered rapid water production.
First oil was achieved in June 1996, 6 months ahead of programme.
Current production is at the expected plateau level of about 58 000 bbl/D from Andrew and 12 000 bbl/D from Cyrus.
Reducing well numbers and using only horizontal wells relies on the long term performance of these wells for economic success.
Andrew/Cyrus is amongst BP's first all-horizontal field developments.
Key design decisions started at the sandface completion: openhole sand control screens were considered because of sand production concerns; the cost and difficulties of cementing and perforating long horizontal liners were reviewed; the savings from using pre-holed, uncemented liners were set against the concerns over long-term production and external casing packer (ECP) reliability.
Multilaterals were also considered in detail.
The outcome of this work was to install pre-holed liners with cement inflated ECP's in both Cyrus wells, but to use cemented and perforated liners on Andrew.
The Andrew Well Engineering Alliance was created, and was aligned to BP's key business objectives through the 'minimum performance standards' of well on target, % of the horizontal section contributing to flow, zonal isolation and data acquisition.
These measures were the basis of triggers for gainshare payments.
Maximising the % contributing to flow led to the world's first through-tubing, underbalanced, single trip, no kill, horizontal perforating system using a hydraulic workover unit and formation isolation valve.
The success of this approach has been confirmed by recent coiled tubing production logging (CT-PLT).
This paper discusses the reservoir uncertainties and anticipated well management challenges.
It describes the balance of factors that impacted the design of the horizontal completions.
Initial well construction experiences and the first 6 months of production are described.
Development Outline Figure 1 gives an outline of the development area.
The Andrew topsides were installed in May 1996, with the gas and oil export pipelines and subsea bundle tie-back of Cyrus completed a few weeks later.
Andrew reserves are estimated at 112 × 106 bbl.
Development drilling on Cyrus has suggested that the sanction estimate of 24 × 106 bbl was optimistic, with the structure being somewhat smaller than expected.
Cyrus 're-development' is through primary depletion from two new horizontal wells, replacing the previous horizontals.
The Andrew reservoir, a four-way dip-closed structure with a 58m oil column between gas cap and aquifer, is being developed with ten horizontal producers.
It is expected that aquifer support will be sufficient to maintain reservoir pressure.
Whilst the development includes a vertical gas management well completed in the gas cap, there are no plans for water or gas injection wells for pressure maintenance.

Related Results

Survey Of Horizontal Gas Well Activity
Survey Of Horizontal Gas Well Activity
Abstract This paper presents the results of a survey on horizontal gas well activity throughout the world. The survey was conducted for the Gas Research Institute...
A New Completion Technology to Improve Horizontal Well Performances
A New Completion Technology to Improve Horizontal Well Performances
Abstract Some recent research results have shown that especially for long horizontal wells with relatively high rate, when the friction loss plays a significant r...
Plugless Completions Techniques and Evaluation in the Appalachian Basin
Plugless Completions Techniques and Evaluation in the Appalachian Basin
Abstract The modern hydraulic fracturing process in unconventional shales has relied mainly on the use of mechanical isolation techniques (frac plugs) for internal i...
Pressure Transient Analysis for Horizontal Well and Multi-Branched Horizontal Wells
Pressure Transient Analysis for Horizontal Well and Multi-Branched Horizontal Wells
Abstract Transient pressure for cases of a horizontal wellbore axis with any angle inclined to a fault or a constant pressure supply boundary in anisotropic forma...
Physical Modelling of Recovery Processes Utilizing Horizontal Wells-Impact of Scaling Well Size
Physical Modelling of Recovery Processes Utilizing Horizontal Wells-Impact of Scaling Well Size
Abstract One of the main characteristics of horizontal wells is their extended contact with the reservoir. This extended contact provides many benefits for horizo...
Operational Aspects of Drilling and Completing Horizontal Wells Offshore Abu Dhabi
Operational Aspects of Drilling and Completing Horizontal Wells Offshore Abu Dhabi
Abstract Since June 1989, Zakum Development Company (ZADCO) has drilled and completed eight horizontal producing wells in Upper Zakum Field and one well in Umm Al...
The Improvement of Production Profile While Managing Reservoir Uncertainties with Inflow Control Devices Completions
The Improvement of Production Profile While Managing Reservoir Uncertainties with Inflow Control Devices Completions
Abstract The distributions of various parameters such as of the petro-physical properties, fluid contacts, relative permeabilities, aquifer strength etc. influence o...
Anisotropic Permeability Estimation by Horizontal Well Tests
Anisotropic Permeability Estimation by Horizontal Well Tests
Abstract A horizontal well drilled along the principal permeability kx direction is often assumed in horizontal well test interpretation. However, the orientation...

Back to Top