Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Aristotle in Plotinus’ Doctrine of Extension
View through CrossRef
This article examines the sources of Plotinus’ doctrine of extension, a central aspect of his Platonic dualism whose origins have received little scholarly attention. This doctrine entails a distinction between two central concepts: the notion of body as primarily divisible or extended ‘mass’ (ὄγκος) and that of immanent form as secondarily divisible or extended quality (ποιότης). The article argues that, although Plotinus presents this doctrine as an interpretation of Plato, Timaeus 35a, its philosophical content is irreducible to the Timaeus, and that Plotinus rather employs, adapts, and develops concepts drawn from Aristotle. First, Plotinus’ notion of ‘mass’ finds conceptual and textual parallels in Aristotle’s Physics, especially in the discussions of place and continuous magnitudes (Books IV and VI). Second, Plotinus’ distinction between bodies and qualities as primarily and secondarily divisible or extended represents a sophisticated development of chapter 6 of the Categories, where Aristotle discusses quantity and distinguishes per se and accidental quantities. Finally, the article shows that Middle Platonic authors (Ammonius Saccas, Numenius) had already employed Aristotle’s distinction between per se and accidental quantities in their anti-Stoic polemics, and that Plotinus’ engagement with Aristotle is far more sophisticated.
Title: Aristotle in Plotinus’ Doctrine of Extension
Description:
This article examines the sources of Plotinus’ doctrine of extension, a central aspect of his Platonic dualism whose origins have received little scholarly attention.
This doctrine entails a distinction between two central concepts: the notion of body as primarily divisible or extended ‘mass’ (ὄγκος) and that of immanent form as secondarily divisible or extended quality (ποιότης).
The article argues that, although Plotinus presents this doctrine as an interpretation of Plato, Timaeus 35a, its philosophical content is irreducible to the Timaeus, and that Plotinus rather employs, adapts, and develops concepts drawn from Aristotle.
First, Plotinus’ notion of ‘mass’ finds conceptual and textual parallels in Aristotle’s Physics, especially in the discussions of place and continuous magnitudes (Books IV and VI).
Second, Plotinus’ distinction between bodies and qualities as primarily and secondarily divisible or extended represents a sophisticated development of chapter 6 of the Categories, where Aristotle discusses quantity and distinguishes per se and accidental quantities.
Finally, the article shows that Middle Platonic authors (Ammonius Saccas, Numenius) had already employed Aristotle’s distinction between per se and accidental quantities in their anti-Stoic polemics, and that Plotinus’ engagement with Aristotle is far more sophisticated.
Related Results
Aristotle in Plotinus’ Doctrine of Extension
Aristotle in Plotinus’ Doctrine of Extension
This article examines the sources of Plotinus’ doctrine of extension, a central aspect of his Platonic dualism whose origins have received little scholarly attention. This doctrine...
6 Plotinus
6 Plotinus
AbstractThis chapter examines the instances in which Plotinus compares Peripatetic and Platonic views, and attempts to sketch a preliminary answer to the question of how Plotinus s...
İsmâilîlik ve Neoplatonizm: Ebû Ya‘kûb es-Sicistânî Örneği
İsmâilîlik ve Neoplatonizm: Ebû Ya‘kûb es-Sicistânî Örneği
Bu çalışma Ebû Ya‘kûb es-Sicistânî'nin Yeni Eflâtuncu görüşlerini, Plotinus'un düşünceleriyle karşılaştırmalı olarak ele almaktadır. 4./10. yüzyılda yaşayan Sicistânî, İsmâilîliğin...
Finding the Major Questions Doctrine
Finding the Major Questions Doctrine
<p>The major questions doctrine has been invoked primarily in the rulemaking context, where it requires agencies to identify particularly clear statutory au...
Plotinus on Individuation
Plotinus on Individuation
No other Neoplatonic treatise has sparked as much debate as Ennead V. 7 [18] of Plotinus, ‘On the question of whether there are also Forms of individuals’. In this treatise, Plotin...
Porphyry, Universal Soul and the Arabic Plotinus
Porphyry, Universal Soul and the Arabic Plotinus
Scholars working in the field of Graeco-Arabic Neoplatonism often discuss the role Porphyry, the editor of Plotinus, must be credited with in the formation of the Arabic Plotinianc...
Dodds, Plotinus, and Stephen MacKenna
Dodds, Plotinus, and Stephen MacKenna
This chapter examines E.R. Dodds’s relationship with the Irishman Stephen MacKenna (1872–1934), the remarkable journalist turned Greek scholar, who devoted the latter part of his l...
Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?
Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?
AbstractThis book breaks new ground in the study of later ancient philosophy by examining the interplay of the two main schools of thought, Platonism and Aristotelianism, from the ...

