Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Towards best management practices for implementing manufacturing flexibility
View through CrossRef
PurposeThe purpose of this research is to develop a framework and an initial list of best management practices for implementing manufacturing flexibility.Design/methodology/approachTo identify these practices, recent frameworks (i.e. 1988 and onward) for implementing manufacturing flexibility in organizations are reviewed. Based on this review, the major management practices for implementing flexibility are identified and synthesized into a new framework.FindingsThis framework suggests that manufacturing flexibility should be implemented using a three‐stage approach, labeled: identifying required flexibility (i.e. identifying and justifying the flexibility types, measurements and tools needed to achieve the required manufacturing flexibility), achieving required flexibility (i.e. acquiring and implementing the organizational and technological tools needed to achieve the required manufacturing flexibility) and managing required flexibility (i.e. monitoring and changing the required flexibility types and levels, in light of changing uncertainty and competitive, manufacturing and marketing strategies). Based on this framework, a number of potential best management practices are identified.Research limitations/implicationsThis report is conceptual in nature. Future research will focus on empirically testing the practices presented in order to develop a more complete and rigorous list of best management practices for implementing manufacturing flexibility.Practical implicationsThis research provides manufacturing managers with a starting point for developing a formal process for identifying, implementing, and monitoring manufacturing flexibility, thus ensuring that the manufacturing flexibility that exists is continually meeting the manufacturing and competitive strategies of the organization. Various conceptual relationships are identified by the presence of arrows in the framework. As a result, the implications of the conceptual framework for researchers is that it provides a very good starting point for conducting exploratory and confirmatory research on the process of managing manufacturing flexibility.Originality/valueThis research synthesizes existing frameworks for implementing manufacturing flexibility in organizations, and addresses a gap in the research, specifically the need to identify and empirically test best management practices for implementing manufacturing flexibility.
Title: Towards best management practices for implementing manufacturing flexibility
Description:
PurposeThe purpose of this research is to develop a framework and an initial list of best management practices for implementing manufacturing flexibility.
Design/methodology/approachTo identify these practices, recent frameworks (i.
e.
1988 and onward) for implementing manufacturing flexibility in organizations are reviewed.
Based on this review, the major management practices for implementing flexibility are identified and synthesized into a new framework.
FindingsThis framework suggests that manufacturing flexibility should be implemented using a three‐stage approach, labeled: identifying required flexibility (i.
e.
identifying and justifying the flexibility types, measurements and tools needed to achieve the required manufacturing flexibility), achieving required flexibility (i.
e.
acquiring and implementing the organizational and technological tools needed to achieve the required manufacturing flexibility) and managing required flexibility (i.
e.
monitoring and changing the required flexibility types and levels, in light of changing uncertainty and competitive, manufacturing and marketing strategies).
Based on this framework, a number of potential best management practices are identified.
Research limitations/implicationsThis report is conceptual in nature.
Future research will focus on empirically testing the practices presented in order to develop a more complete and rigorous list of best management practices for implementing manufacturing flexibility.
Practical implicationsThis research provides manufacturing managers with a starting point for developing a formal process for identifying, implementing, and monitoring manufacturing flexibility, thus ensuring that the manufacturing flexibility that exists is continually meeting the manufacturing and competitive strategies of the organization.
Various conceptual relationships are identified by the presence of arrows in the framework.
As a result, the implications of the conceptual framework for researchers is that it provides a very good starting point for conducting exploratory and confirmatory research on the process of managing manufacturing flexibility.
Originality/valueThis research synthesizes existing frameworks for implementing manufacturing flexibility in organizations, and addresses a gap in the research, specifically the need to identify and empirically test best management practices for implementing manufacturing flexibility.
Related Results
Flexibility and agility: evolution and relationship
Flexibility and agility: evolution and relationship
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to clarify the confusion between flexibility and agility. The paper traces the evolution of agility and the evolution of flexibility over time, ...
An assessment of sustainable supply chain management practices in the upstream pharmaceutical industry of Ghana
An assessment of sustainable supply chain management practices in the upstream pharmaceutical industry of Ghana
The drive for the adoption of Sustainable Supply Chain Management practices among
pharmaceutical companies is on the rise given the global effort to attain net zero of carbon
emiss...
How Flexible is Your Computing System?
How Flexible is Your Computing System?
In literature, computer architectures are frequently claimed to be
highly flexible
, typically implying the existence of trade-offs between flexibility and ...
Smart Manufacturing Application in Precision Manufacturing
Smart Manufacturing Application in Precision Manufacturing
Industry 4.0 presents an opportunity to gain a competitive advantage through productivity, flexibility, and speed. It also empowers the manufacturing sector to drive the sustainabi...
Green supply chain management initiatives and operational competitive performance
Green supply chain management initiatives and operational competitive performance
PurposeManufacturing organizations have begun to implement green supply chain management (GSCM) practices in response to customer demand for products and services that are environm...
Unveiling the Environmental and Economic Implications of Additive Manufacturing on Inbound Transportation
Unveiling the Environmental and Economic Implications of Additive Manufacturing on Inbound Transportation
This studyaims to investigate the impact of additive manufacturing (AM) on the sustainability of inbound transportation. By combining insights from existing litera...
AI-enhanced manufacturing robotics: A review of applications and trends
AI-enhanced manufacturing robotics: A review of applications and trends
This review explores the transformative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on manufacturing robotics, elucidating a comprehensive overview of applications and emerging trends w...
A Comparison of Business Management Characteristics in U.S., German, and Japanese Manufacturing Corporations
A Comparison of Business Management Characteristics in U.S., German, and Japanese Manufacturing Corporations
Abstract
Comparing the management characteristics of business firms in different countries has been a popular research topic in business administration. In this p...

