Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

View through CrossRef
330 Background: The “optimal” adjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer remains undetermined. Chemotherapy (chemo) such as gemcitabine (Gem), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and chemo-radiotherapy (chemoRT) with either Gem or 5-FU have been investigated in trials. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the overall efficacy of adjuvant treatment. Methods: We searched databases (PubMed, Medline, Cochrane database) and major conference proceedings up until August 2015 for randomized trials comparing chemo or chemoRT versus (vs) observation, two different chemo regimens and chemoRT vs chemo. Primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points were relapse free survival (RFS), grade 3/4 toxic effects and quality of life (QoL). We performed meta-analysis as per the PRISMA guidelines; hazard ratios (HR) for OS and RFS were pooled with random-effects modelling. Results: Fifteen trials were identified evaluating 4348 patients. For trials comparing chemo to observation (7 trials, n = 1383) the OS HR was 0.77 (95% CI 0.67-0.89, p = 0.001) and PFS HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.53-1.01, p = 0.06) both favouring chemo. For trials investigating Gem (2 trials, n = 472), OS was improved with HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.63 -0.92, p = 0.006) as was RFS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46-0.68, p < 0.00001). For trials investigating agents other than Gem (5 trials, n = 911), OS was improved with HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.63-0.99, p = 0.04), but RFS was not (2 trials only, HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.73-1.37, p = 0.99). Five trials (n = 1832) compared different chemo regimens to Gem in each case; pooled OS HR was 0.90 (95% CI 0.65-1.25, p = 0.54) and RFS HR 0.88 (95% CI 0.67-1.15, p = 0.35). Insufficient data was available to pool grade 3/4 toxicity for chemo vs observation trials; no significant difference was found in incidence of overall grade 3/4 toxicity for trials comparing two chemo regimens (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.39-2.47, p = 0.96). QoL data was available in 3 trials (ESPAC-1, ESPAC-3, CapRi) with no significant differences noted. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemo vs no chemo for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma improves OS and RFS. Adjuvant ChemoRT vs no treatment is not beneficial. Overall, novel chemo regimens have not been shown to be superior to Gem. Reporting of QoL is inadequate to make any conclusion.
Title: Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A systemic review and meta-analysis.
Description:
330 Background: The “optimal” adjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer remains undetermined.
Chemotherapy (chemo) such as gemcitabine (Gem), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and chemo-radiotherapy (chemoRT) with either Gem or 5-FU have been investigated in trials.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the overall efficacy of adjuvant treatment.
Methods: We searched databases (PubMed, Medline, Cochrane database) and major conference proceedings up until August 2015 for randomized trials comparing chemo or chemoRT versus (vs) observation, two different chemo regimens and chemoRT vs chemo.
Primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points were relapse free survival (RFS), grade 3/4 toxic effects and quality of life (QoL).
We performed meta-analysis as per the PRISMA guidelines; hazard ratios (HR) for OS and RFS were pooled with random-effects modelling.
Results: Fifteen trials were identified evaluating 4348 patients.
For trials comparing chemo to observation (7 trials, n = 1383) the OS HR was 0.
77 (95% CI 0.
67-0.
89, p = 0.
001) and PFS HR 0.
73 (95% CI 0.
53-1.
01, p = 0.
06) both favouring chemo.
For trials investigating Gem (2 trials, n = 472), OS was improved with HR 0.
76 (95% CI 0.
63 -0.
92, p = 0.
006) as was RFS (HR 0.
56, 95% CI 0.
46-0.
68, p < 0.
00001).
For trials investigating agents other than Gem (5 trials, n = 911), OS was improved with HR 0.
79 (95% CI 0.
63-0.
99, p = 0.
04), but RFS was not (2 trials only, HR 1.
00, 95% CI 0.
73-1.
37, p = 0.
99).
Five trials (n = 1832) compared different chemo regimens to Gem in each case; pooled OS HR was 0.
90 (95% CI 0.
65-1.
25, p = 0.
54) and RFS HR 0.
88 (95% CI 0.
67-1.
15, p = 0.
35).
Insufficient data was available to pool grade 3/4 toxicity for chemo vs observation trials; no significant difference was found in incidence of overall grade 3/4 toxicity for trials comparing two chemo regimens (OR 0.
98, 95% CI 0.
39-2.
47, p = 0.
96).
QoL data was available in 3 trials (ESPAC-1, ESPAC-3, CapRi) with no significant differences noted.
Conclusions: Adjuvant chemo vs no chemo for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma improves OS and RFS.
Adjuvant ChemoRT vs no treatment is not beneficial.
Overall, novel chemo regimens have not been shown to be superior to Gem.
Reporting of QoL is inadequate to make any conclusion.

Related Results

Abstract IA-08: Clinical advances in pancreas adenocarcinoma
Abstract IA-08: Clinical advances in pancreas adenocarcinoma
Abstract Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal cancers today and is expected to be the second cause of cancer death in the coming decade. M...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Carcinoma ex Pleomorphic Adenoma: A Case Series and Literature Review
Carcinoma ex Pleomorphic Adenoma: A Case Series and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA) is a rare malignant salivary gland tumor that can lead to severe complications and carries a risk of distant metastasi...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
High KLK7 Expression Predicts Unfavorable Outcomes in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
High KLK7 Expression Predicts Unfavorable Outcomes in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Abstract Background Studies have shown that kallikrein-related peptidase 7 (KLK7) is abnormally expressed in a various of tumours and plays a crucial role in tumour progres...

Back to Top