Javascript must be enabled to continue!
“Prevalence, Predictors and Outcomes of Surgical and Gastrointestinal Bleeding Events in Patients with COVID-19 Infection on Anticoagulation”
View through CrossRef
Abstract
BackgroundThis study aims to examine risk factors and complications associated with bleeding events in patients with coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) who are on anticoagulation. MethodWe conducted retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all patients who were admitted with COVID-19 and developed bleeding events. ResultsOf 122 bleeds, there were 67 (28%) non-gastrointestinal (GI) and 55 (28%) GI bleeds. Overall mortality was 59% (n= 72), 34 (28%) and 38 (31%) following non-GI and GI bleeds respectively. The prevalence of therapeutic invasive interventions was 7.5% and 16.3% in non-GI and GI bleeds respectively and all were successful in resolving the bleeding event. We found that having a GI bleeds was associated with higher risk of mortality compared to non-GI bleeds (p= 0.04) and having occult bleeds to be associated with 15 times increased risk of mortality. Furthermore, patients who were on therapeutic dose of anticoagulation were more likely to die compared to patients who were on none (odds ratio (OR) 0.1, 95%CI 0.01-0.86), on prophylactic (OR 0.07,95%CI 0.02-0.28) or intermediate (OR 0.36,95%CI 0.09-1.34) anticoagulation doses.Conclusions Routine prescription of supra-prophylactic dose anticoagulation should be revisited as it appears to be associated with increased of mortality and so more individualized approach to prescription should be the norm. Regardless of the cause of bleeding event it appears that the majority of bleeding events resolve with noninvasive interventions, correction and optimization sepsis therapies. However, when invasive interventions were necessary, they were associated with high success rate despite the delay.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: “Prevalence, Predictors and Outcomes of Surgical and Gastrointestinal Bleeding Events in Patients with COVID-19 Infection on Anticoagulation”
Description:
Abstract
BackgroundThis study aims to examine risk factors and complications associated with bleeding events in patients with coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) who are on anticoagulation.
MethodWe conducted retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all patients who were admitted with COVID-19 and developed bleeding events.
ResultsOf 122 bleeds, there were 67 (28%) non-gastrointestinal (GI) and 55 (28%) GI bleeds.
Overall mortality was 59% (n= 72), 34 (28%) and 38 (31%) following non-GI and GI bleeds respectively.
The prevalence of therapeutic invasive interventions was 7.
5% and 16.
3% in non-GI and GI bleeds respectively and all were successful in resolving the bleeding event.
We found that having a GI bleeds was associated with higher risk of mortality compared to non-GI bleeds (p= 0.
04) and having occult bleeds to be associated with 15 times increased risk of mortality.
Furthermore, patients who were on therapeutic dose of anticoagulation were more likely to die compared to patients who were on none (odds ratio (OR) 0.
1, 95%CI 0.
01-0.
86), on prophylactic (OR 0.
07,95%CI 0.
02-0.
28) or intermediate (OR 0.
36,95%CI 0.
09-1.
34) anticoagulation doses.
Conclusions Routine prescription of supra-prophylactic dose anticoagulation should be revisited as it appears to be associated with increased of mortality and so more individualized approach to prescription should be the norm.
Regardless of the cause of bleeding event it appears that the majority of bleeding events resolve with noninvasive interventions, correction and optimization sepsis therapies.
However, when invasive interventions were necessary, they were associated with high success rate despite the delay.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
BackgroundA clinical dilemma exists in patients with CKD, ESKD, and after kidney transplantation, as they face concurrent risks of both thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications...
Therapeutic versus Prophylactic Anticoagulation for Patients Admitted to Hospital with COVID-19 and Elevated D-dimer Concentration (ACTION): An Open-Label, Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled Trial
Therapeutic versus Prophylactic Anticoagulation for Patients Admitted to Hospital with COVID-19 and Elevated D-dimer Concentration (ACTION): An Open-Label, Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled Trial
Background. COVID-19 is associated with a prothrombotic state leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Whether therapeutic anticoagulation improves outcomes in patients hospitalised w...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Does High-Dose Thromboprophylaxis Improve Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients? A Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies
Does High-Dose Thromboprophylaxis Improve Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients? A Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies
Abstract
Background Thromboembolism remains a detrimental complication of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) despite the use of prophylactic doses of anticoagulation
...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
P677Association between bleeding after acute coronary syndrome and newly diagnosed cancers
P677Association between bleeding after acute coronary syndrome and newly diagnosed cancers
Abstract
Introduction
There is a growing body of evidence on the incidence and negative prognostic impact of post-discharge hemo...

