Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Keratoconus Screening in Primary Eye Care – A General Overview
View through CrossRef
Keratoconus early detection (screening) and diagnosis requires an in-deep corneal analysis with different techniques; slip lamp assessment, corneal topography and corneal tomography are the most commonly accepted to detect clinical signs and assess anterior and posterior corneal surface and global corneal pachymetry. However, keratoconus early detection and definitive diagnosis are two different clinical procedures that require a different approach and goals. The aim of this review is to provide some general information about different corneal assessment technology, useful in keratoconus patient assessment; highlighting the differences in the adequate investigation techniques to its detection in primary eye care clinic and to conduct the definitive diagnosis (usually in a cornea specialist clinic). Information of most extensively available commercial devices and the advantages and disadvantages of their use in keratoconus early detection and diagnosis are described. In conclusion, corneal topography (Placido-based keratographers) plays a significant role in keratoconus detection, especially in primary eye care clinics. However, corneal tomography (with different slit scanning and/or rotational imaging devices) including posterior corneal surface assessment and global corneal pachymetry investigation, is critical in definitive keratoconus diagnosis.
Title: Keratoconus Screening in Primary Eye Care – A General Overview
Description:
Keratoconus early detection (screening) and diagnosis requires an in-deep corneal analysis with different techniques; slip lamp assessment, corneal topography and corneal tomography are the most commonly accepted to detect clinical signs and assess anterior and posterior corneal surface and global corneal pachymetry.
However, keratoconus early detection and definitive diagnosis are two different clinical procedures that require a different approach and goals.
The aim of this review is to provide some general information about different corneal assessment technology, useful in keratoconus patient assessment; highlighting the differences in the adequate investigation techniques to its detection in primary eye care clinic and to conduct the definitive diagnosis (usually in a cornea specialist clinic).
Information of most extensively available commercial devices and the advantages and disadvantages of their use in keratoconus early detection and diagnosis are described.
In conclusion, corneal topography (Placido-based keratographers) plays a significant role in keratoconus detection, especially in primary eye care clinics.
However, corneal tomography (with different slit scanning and/or rotational imaging devices) including posterior corneal surface assessment and global corneal pachymetry investigation, is critical in definitive keratoconus diagnosis.
Related Results
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
1 INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 5 -- 2 GENERAL BACKGROUND: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 7 -- 2.1 CHRONIC AND COMPLEX MENTAL DISORDERS: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE -- S...
Topographic Keratoconus Incidence in Greece Diagnosed in Routine Consecutive Cataract Procedures: A Consecutive Case Series of 1250 Cases over 5 Years
Topographic Keratoconus Incidence in Greece Diagnosed in Routine Consecutive Cataract Procedures: A Consecutive Case Series of 1250 Cases over 5 Years
Background: Scheimpflug tomography has for many years been an integral part of our pre-operative assessment in cataract extraction. We retrospectively reviewed the incidence of top...
Asthma and Keratoconus: An analysis of the risk factors association with the severity of keratoconus
Asthma and Keratoconus: An analysis of the risk factors association with the severity of keratoconus
Abstract
Background: A cross-sectional study was undertaken in Australia to explore a wide range of risk factors associated with keratoconus. A questionnaire addressing age...
Correlation of the KISA% index and Scheimpflug tomography in ‘normal’, ‘subclinical’, ‘keratoconus‐suspect’ and ‘clinically manifest’ keratoconus eyes
Correlation of the KISA% index and Scheimpflug tomography in ‘normal’, ‘subclinical’, ‘keratoconus‐suspect’ and ‘clinically manifest’ keratoconus eyes
AbstractPurposeTo analyse tomographic changes in eyes classified as ‘normal’, ‘keratoconus‐suspect’ and ‘clinically manifest keratoconus’ based on the established KISA% definition ...
Eye Rubbing, a Sine Qua Non for Keratoconus?
Eye Rubbing, a Sine Qua Non for Keratoconus?
ABSTRACT
Keratoconus, a dystrophy of unknown origin, remains an ophthalmic enigma. The contrast between the presence of marked structural changes and deformation of the corneal wal...
Prevalence of Keratoconus and Characteristics of Refractive Errors in First-Degree Relatives of Patients With Keratoconus Among Egyptians
Prevalence of Keratoconus and Characteristics of Refractive Errors in First-Degree Relatives of Patients With Keratoconus Among Egyptians
Purpose:
This study investigated the occurrence of keratoconus among first-degree relatives of patients with keratoconus and evaluated their refractive characteristics....
A predictive model for early diagnosis of keratoconus
A predictive model for early diagnosis of keratoconus
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of keratoconus in the early stages of the disease is necessary to initiate an early treatment of keratoconus. Furthermore to avoid possib...
A predictive model for early diagnosis of keratoconus
A predictive model for early diagnosis of keratoconus
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of keratoconus in the early stages of the disease is necessary to initiate an early treatment of keratoconus. Furthermore, to avoid possi...

