Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Eternity
View through CrossRef
The distinctive, philosophically interesting concept of eternity arose very early in the history of philosophy as the concept of a mode of existence that was not only beginningless and endless but also essentially different from time. It was introduced into early Greek philosophy as the mode of existence required for fundamental reality (being) contrasted with ordinary appearance (becoming). But the concept was given its classic formulation by Boethius, who thought of eternity as God’s mode of existence and defined God’s eternality as ‘the complete possession all at once of illimitable life’. As defined by Boethius the concept was important in medieval philosophy. The elements of the Boethian definition are life, illimitability (and hence duration), and absence of succession (or timelessness). Defined in this way, eternality is proper to an entity identifiable as a mind or a person (and in just that sense living) but existing beginninglessly, endlessly and timelessly.
Such a concept raises obvious difficulties. Some philosophers think the difficulties can be resolved, but others think that in the light of such difficulties the concept must be modified or simply rejected as incoherent. The most obvious difficulty has to do with the combination of atemporality and duration.
Special objections have arisen in connection with ascribing eternality to God. Some people have thought that an eternal being could not do anything at all, especially not in the temporal world. But the notion of an atemporal person’s acting is not incoherent. Such acts as knowing necessary truths or willing that a world exist for a certain length of time are acts that themselves take no time and require no temporal location. An eternal God could engage in acts of cognition and of volition and could even do things that might seem to require a temporal location, such as answering a prayer.
The concept of God’s eternality is relevant to several issues in philosophy of religion, including the apparent irreconcilability of divine omniscience with divine immutability and with human freedom.
Title: Eternity
Description:
The distinctive, philosophically interesting concept of eternity arose very early in the history of philosophy as the concept of a mode of existence that was not only beginningless and endless but also essentially different from time.
It was introduced into early Greek philosophy as the mode of existence required for fundamental reality (being) contrasted with ordinary appearance (becoming).
But the concept was given its classic formulation by Boethius, who thought of eternity as God’s mode of existence and defined God’s eternality as ‘the complete possession all at once of illimitable life’.
As defined by Boethius the concept was important in medieval philosophy.
The elements of the Boethian definition are life, illimitability (and hence duration), and absence of succession (or timelessness).
Defined in this way, eternality is proper to an entity identifiable as a mind or a person (and in just that sense living) but existing beginninglessly, endlessly and timelessly.
Such a concept raises obvious difficulties.
Some philosophers think the difficulties can be resolved, but others think that in the light of such difficulties the concept must be modified or simply rejected as incoherent.
The most obvious difficulty has to do with the combination of atemporality and duration.
Special objections have arisen in connection with ascribing eternality to God.
Some people have thought that an eternal being could not do anything at all, especially not in the temporal world.
But the notion of an atemporal person’s acting is not incoherent.
Such acts as knowing necessary truths or willing that a world exist for a certain length of time are acts that themselves take no time and require no temporal location.
An eternal God could engage in acts of cognition and of volition and could even do things that might seem to require a temporal location, such as answering a prayer.
The concept of God’s eternality is relevant to several issues in philosophy of religion, including the apparent irreconcilability of divine omniscience with divine immutability and with human freedom.
Related Results
Konsep Keabadian dan Waktu dalam Perspektif Pemikiran Islam
Konsep Keabadian dan Waktu dalam Perspektif Pemikiran Islam
Intellectual pluralism which refers to a variety of views and approaches in understanding Islamic teachings, which allows different interpretations of certain aspects of Islamic be...
‘Heaven’s Brandy’
‘Heaven’s Brandy’
Apparently resolutely of this world, Byron is often viewed as an ‘outsider’ puncturing any residual pretensions of Romanticism, an intelligent man but ‘no philosopher’. But this po...
‘Demand No Direr Name’: Eternity in British Romantic Poetry
‘Demand No Direr Name’: Eternity in British Romantic Poetry
The introduction defines eternity in the context of this study, revealing the complex philosophical and religious underpinnings of the ideas during the Romantic period. It asserts ...
Can History Measure Eternity? A Reply to William Craig
Can History Measure Eternity? A Reply to William Craig
I am grateful to Dr William L. Craig for his reply to an earlier article of mine in this journal, on the relationship between God and time. Craig and I agree on most points with re...
God, Eternity and Time — An Essay in Review of Alan G. Padgett, God, Eternity and the Nature of Time
God, Eternity and Time — An Essay in Review of Alan G. Padgett, God, Eternity and the Nature of Time
The reviewer commends Alan Padgett, God, Eternity and the Nature of Time, as an important reference book on its subject. He criticises the author for his rejection of the tradition...
A Competition for Eternity: Yeats's Revision of His Later Poems
A Competition for Eternity: Yeats's Revision of His Later Poems
Lady Gregory recorded in her journal in 1925 that Yeats, scorning what he believed to be excessive praise of certain nineteenth and twentieth century poets, said, “These critics ou...
Zoē aiōniōs: Giorgio Agamben and the Critique of Katechontic Time
Zoē aiōniōs: Giorgio Agamben and the Critique of Katechontic Time
This chapter illuminates Agamben’s understanding of time, which is central to his ‘messianic’ approach to politics, by tracing the semantic history of the term aion (which gives ri...
Reprobation
Reprobation
Reprobation is an eternal decision by God that results in everlasting death and punishment for some persons. The doctrine of reprobation typically takes one of three forms: (1) tha...

