Javascript must be enabled to continue!
AI facilitated sperm detection in azoospermic samples for use in ICSI
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Research question
Can artificial intelligence (AI) improve efficiency and efficacy of sperm searches in azoospermic samples?
Design
This two-phase proof-of-concept study beginning with a training phase using 8 azoospermic patients (>10000 sperm images) to provide a variety of surgically collected samples for sperm morphology and debris variation to train a convolutional neural network to identify sperm. Secondly, side-by-side testing on 2 cohorts, an embryologist versus the AI identifying all sperm in still images (cohort 1, N=4, 2660 sperm) and then a side-by-side test with deployment of the AI model on an ICSI microscope and the embryologist performing a search with and without the aid of the AI (cohort 2, N=4, >1300 sperm). Time taken, accuracy and precision of sperm identification was measured.
Results
In cohort 1, the AI model showed improvement in time-taken to identify all sperm per field of view (0.019±0.30 x 10
-5
s versus 36.10±1.18s, P<0.0001) and improved accuracy (91.95±0.81% vs 86.52±1.34%, P<0.001) compared to an embryologist. From a total of 688 sperm in all samples combined, 560 were found by an embryologist and 611 were found by the AI in <1000
th
of the time. In cohort 2, the AI-aided embryologist took significantly less time per droplet (98.90±3.19s vs 168.7±7.84s, P<0.0001) and found 1396 sperm, while 1274 were found without AI, although no significant difference was observed.
Conclusions
AI-powered image analysis has the potential for seamless integration into laboratory workflows, and to reduce time to identify and isolate sperm from surgical sperm samples from hours to minutes, thus increasing success rates from these treatments.
Title: AI facilitated sperm detection in azoospermic samples for use in ICSI
Description:
Abstract
Research question
Can artificial intelligence (AI) improve efficiency and efficacy of sperm searches in azoospermic samples?
Design
This two-phase proof-of-concept study beginning with a training phase using 8 azoospermic patients (>10000 sperm images) to provide a variety of surgically collected samples for sperm morphology and debris variation to train a convolutional neural network to identify sperm.
Secondly, side-by-side testing on 2 cohorts, an embryologist versus the AI identifying all sperm in still images (cohort 1, N=4, 2660 sperm) and then a side-by-side test with deployment of the AI model on an ICSI microscope and the embryologist performing a search with and without the aid of the AI (cohort 2, N=4, >1300 sperm).
Time taken, accuracy and precision of sperm identification was measured.
Results
In cohort 1, the AI model showed improvement in time-taken to identify all sperm per field of view (0.
019±0.
30 x 10
-5
s versus 36.
10±1.
18s, P<0.
0001) and improved accuracy (91.
95±0.
81% vs 86.
52±1.
34%, P<0.
001) compared to an embryologist.
From a total of 688 sperm in all samples combined, 560 were found by an embryologist and 611 were found by the AI in <1000
th
of the time.
In cohort 2, the AI-aided embryologist took significantly less time per droplet (98.
90±3.
19s vs 168.
7±7.
84s, P<0.
0001) and found 1396 sperm, while 1274 were found without AI, although no significant difference was observed.
Conclusions
AI-powered image analysis has the potential for seamless integration into laboratory workflows, and to reduce time to identify and isolate sperm from surgical sperm samples from hours to minutes, thus increasing success rates from these treatments.
Related Results
P-072 Fresh testicular sperm seems to yield more fertilization abnormalities and early pregnancy loss than frozen testicular sperm
P-072 Fresh testicular sperm seems to yield more fertilization abnormalities and early pregnancy loss than frozen testicular sperm
Abstract
Study question
How do ICSI outcomes using fresh testicular sperm, compare to those using frozen samples cryopreserved f...
P-046 Effect of different sperm chromatin dispersion type on IVF/ICSI outcome and offspring profile
P-046 Effect of different sperm chromatin dispersion type on IVF/ICSI outcome and offspring profile
Abstract
Study question
Whether the percentage of different sperm chromatin dispersion type are associated with the IVF/ICSI out...
P–025 Sperm selection using a modified “swim up” technique in absence of sperm centrifugation improve sperm DNA fragmentation and decreases miscarriage rate
P–025 Sperm selection using a modified “swim up” technique in absence of sperm centrifugation improve sperm DNA fragmentation and decreases miscarriage rate
Abstract
Study question
Is it useful to avoid sperm centrifugation in laboratory routine work to improve sperm quality and repro...
O-147 Factors influencing ICSI outcome after sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia patients with different types of etiologies: a retrospective study of 1157 patients
O-147 Factors influencing ICSI outcome after sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia patients with different types of etiologies: a retrospective study of 1157 patients
Abstract
Study question
What are predictors of fertilization, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and livebirth delivery outcomes af...
O-043 ICSI: the gamechanger in ART
O-043 ICSI: the gamechanger in ART
Abstract
On behalf of Neelke De Munck, Herman Tournaye and all colleagues BrusselsIVF (UZBrussel) and Vrije Universiteit Brussel (1980-2022)
In the ea...
P-061 In situ microfluidics of fluidic walls: a novel deviceless and cost-effective approach for sperm selection in the same ICSI-dish
P-061 In situ microfluidics of fluidic walls: a novel deviceless and cost-effective approach for sperm selection in the same ICSI-dish
Abstract
Study question
Is our novel deviceless method based on in-situ microfluidics a valuable strategy to select suitable spe...
Does Testicular Sperm Alter Reproductive and Perinatal Outcomes in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles? 10 Years' Experience in an Indian Clinic
Does Testicular Sperm Alter Reproductive and Perinatal Outcomes in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles? 10 Years' Experience in an Indian Clinic
Background:
Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) has revolutionized the reproductive outcomes for couples with male factor infertility. Especially in azoospermic me...
P-227 ICSI outcomes after using in-situ microfluidics of fluidic walls versus DGC: a prospective non-inferiority comparative pilot study in sibling oocytes
P-227 ICSI outcomes after using in-situ microfluidics of fluidic walls versus DGC: a prospective non-inferiority comparative pilot study in sibling oocytes
Abstract
Study question
Does the novel strategy in-situ microfluidics (isM) yield comparable ICSI outcomes to the control sperm ...

