Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Precision medicine in type 1 diabetes: comparing metabolic outcomes of Control‐ IQ and MiniMed 780G according to patient characteristics

View through CrossRef
Abstract Aims This study aimed to compare 12‐month metabolic outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with either MiniMed 780G (Guardian 4) or Control‐IQ (Dexcom G6) automated insulin delivery (AID) systems and identify interaction with patient characteristics. Materials and Methods We conducted a single‐centre, retrospective study including all patients (aged ≥16) with T1D who were started on either MiniMed 780G or Control‐IQ between January 2021 and October 2022 and continued for ≥12 months. We used propensity score matching to compare the average marginal effects between MiniMed 780G and Control‐IQ regarding the primary outcome (time in range [TIR]) and secondary outcomes (time below range [TBR], glucose monitoring indicator [GMI] and coefficient of variation [CV]) after 12 months. We tested for interaction effects between baseline characteristics (age, sex, socio‐professional background, body mass index, insulin daily dose, carbohydrate counting practice) and treatment effect. Results We included 245 patients (58% women): 178 treated with Control‐IQ and 67 with MiniMed 780G. The mean ± SD age and haemoglobin A1c were 39 ± 15 years and 8.7 ± 1.8% (72 ± 20 mmol/mol) respectively. In the propensity score‐matched sample ( n  = 221), we observed significant differences in 12‐month TIR (MiniMed 780G minus Control‐IQ [95% CI]: 6.4 [3.4;9.5]), GMI (−0.42 [−0.59; −0.25]) and CV (−2.12 [−3.68; −0.55]), while TBR showed no significant difference (−0.04 [−0.47; +0.40]). The 12‐month TIR difference was consistent across subgroups, including baseline carbohydrate counting characteristics. Conclusion MiniMed 780G is associated with moderate metabolic superiority compared to Control‐IQ, without interaction with patient characteristics. These results suggest that neither model is more appropriate for certain populations, particularly patients without carbohydrate counting practice.
Title: Precision medicine in type 1 diabetes: comparing metabolic outcomes of Control‐ IQ and MiniMed 780G according to patient characteristics
Description:
Abstract Aims This study aimed to compare 12‐month metabolic outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with either MiniMed 780G (Guardian 4) or Control‐IQ (Dexcom G6) automated insulin delivery (AID) systems and identify interaction with patient characteristics.
Materials and Methods We conducted a single‐centre, retrospective study including all patients (aged ≥16) with T1D who were started on either MiniMed 780G or Control‐IQ between January 2021 and October 2022 and continued for ≥12 months.
We used propensity score matching to compare the average marginal effects between MiniMed 780G and Control‐IQ regarding the primary outcome (time in range [TIR]) and secondary outcomes (time below range [TBR], glucose monitoring indicator [GMI] and coefficient of variation [CV]) after 12 months.
We tested for interaction effects between baseline characteristics (age, sex, socio‐professional background, body mass index, insulin daily dose, carbohydrate counting practice) and treatment effect.
Results We included 245 patients (58% women): 178 treated with Control‐IQ and 67 with MiniMed 780G.
The mean ± SD age and haemoglobin A1c were 39 ± 15 years and 8.
7 ± 1.
8% (72 ± 20 mmol/mol) respectively.
In the propensity score‐matched sample ( n  = 221), we observed significant differences in 12‐month TIR (MiniMed 780G minus Control‐IQ [95% CI]: 6.
4 [3.
4;9.
5]), GMI (−0.
42 [−0.
59; −0.
25]) and CV (−2.
12 [−3.
68; −0.
55]), while TBR showed no significant difference (−0.
04 [−0.
47; +0.
40]).
The 12‐month TIR difference was consistent across subgroups, including baseline carbohydrate counting characteristics.
Conclusion MiniMed 780G is associated with moderate metabolic superiority compared to Control‐IQ, without interaction with patient characteristics.
These results suggest that neither model is more appropriate for certain populations, particularly patients without carbohydrate counting practice.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Undiagnosed Diabetes in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Silent Threat in Pakistan
Undiagnosed Diabetes in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Silent Threat in Pakistan
Diabetes mellitus (DM) has emerged as one of the most pressing public health challenges globally, and Pakistan stands among the countries most severely affected. With rising urbani...
Newest and most promising Type 1 Diabetes treatment
Newest and most promising Type 1 Diabetes treatment
Dear Madam, According to the International Diabetes Federation, Pakistan has the highest diabetes prevalence in the world (1).Ttype 1 diabetes (T1DM), a chronic condition where the...
Diabetes Mellitus: Life Style, Obesity and Insulin Resistance
Diabetes Mellitus: Life Style, Obesity and Insulin Resistance
In millennia, 40 million people were died with non-communicable diseases and diabetes is one of them. In diabetes, insulin secretions are not produced properly or resist to body an...
Pregnancy and Challenging Transient Anti-GAD65 Positivity: A Case Report with Literature Review
Pregnancy and Challenging Transient Anti-GAD65 Positivity: A Case Report with Literature Review
Abstract Introduction During pregnancy, women may develop blood glucose abnormalities like gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or, rarely, type 1 diabetes (T1D), which can lead to ...
Diabetes Awareness Among High School Students in Qatar
Diabetes Awareness Among High School Students in Qatar
Diabetes is a disease that occurs when there is an abundance of glucose in the blood stream and the body cannot produce enough insulin in the pancreas to transfer the sugar from th...

Back to Top