Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Designing Accountable Human–AI Teaming in Industrial Production: A Governance Framework for Agentic, Tool-Mediated Workflows

View through CrossRef
In industrial production, agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems combine goal-directed planning with tool-mediated execution and iterative monitoring across the manufacturing execution system, enterprise resource planning, and operational technology layers. Although this autonomy promises responsiveness under volatility, it redistributes decision rights across human supervisors, orchestrator agents, specialist agents, and product owners, turning accountability from a user-interface-level checkpoint into a workflow-level governance problem. Existing responsible-AI and governance research provides valuable principles; however, the following remain underspecified: operationalization of accountability, escalation and override rights, and minimally sufficient traceability in multi-agent production workflows. This study develops a conceptual accountability framework for human–agent–agent cooperation in industrial production. Drawing on a targeted synthesis of information systems and operations management literature, the framework specifies (i) core accountability dimensions for agentic workflows, (ii) a decision-class-anchored responsibility allocation inspired by the RACI framework, and (iii) a minimal evidence bundle for traceability and incident reconstruction, complemented by lifecycle assurance requirements. The framework is applied to a representative high-mix production scenario and refined through semi-structured expert interviews with senior practitioners from DAX-40 automotive manufacturers, a US-based software corporation, and globally leading consulting firms. The study provides actionable design guidelines for developing accountable agentic production systems. It reconceptualizes accountability as a workflow-level governance property, shifts algorithmic accountability from model-level attribution to decision-class-anchored responsibility allocation, and offers a compact design blueprint — comprising risk-calibrated control points, minimally sufficient traceability, and lifecycle governance — for deploying agentic AI in industrial production.
Title: Designing Accountable Human–AI Teaming in Industrial Production: A Governance Framework for Agentic, Tool-Mediated Workflows
Description:
In industrial production, agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems combine goal-directed planning with tool-mediated execution and iterative monitoring across the manufacturing execution system, enterprise resource planning, and operational technology layers.
Although this autonomy promises responsiveness under volatility, it redistributes decision rights across human supervisors, orchestrator agents, specialist agents, and product owners, turning accountability from a user-interface-level checkpoint into a workflow-level governance problem.
Existing responsible-AI and governance research provides valuable principles; however, the following remain underspecified: operationalization of accountability, escalation and override rights, and minimally sufficient traceability in multi-agent production workflows.
This study develops a conceptual accountability framework for human–agent–agent cooperation in industrial production.
Drawing on a targeted synthesis of information systems and operations management literature, the framework specifies (i) core accountability dimensions for agentic workflows, (ii) a decision-class-anchored responsibility allocation inspired by the RACI framework, and (iii) a minimal evidence bundle for traceability and incident reconstruction, complemented by lifecycle assurance requirements.
The framework is applied to a representative high-mix production scenario and refined through semi-structured expert interviews with senior practitioners from DAX-40 automotive manufacturers, a US-based software corporation, and globally leading consulting firms.
The study provides actionable design guidelines for developing accountable agentic production systems.
It reconceptualizes accountability as a workflow-level governance property, shifts algorithmic accountability from model-level attribution to decision-class-anchored responsibility allocation, and offers a compact design blueprint — comprising risk-calibrated control points, minimally sufficient traceability, and lifecycle governance — for deploying agentic AI in industrial production.

Related Results

Agentic AI Systems: Architectures, Autonomy, and Emergent Behaviours
Agentic AI Systems: Architectures, Autonomy, and Emergent Behaviours
<p><b><i><span>Background.</span></i></b><span> Agentic artificial intelligence systems, defined by their capacity to reason, plan, ...
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Smart manufacturing has been developed since the introduction of Industry 4.0. It consists of resource sharing and networking, predictive engineering, and material and data analyti...
Beyond the Principal-Agent Paradox: A Theory of Governance Failure and Mechanism Design in Agentic AI Systems
Beyond the Principal-Agent Paradox: A Theory of Governance Failure and Mechanism Design in Agentic AI Systems
Principal-agent theory has provided the dominant framework for understanding governance failure in organizational settings for five decades. This paper argues that agentic AI syste...
Agentic Engagement Siswa: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematik
Agentic Engagement Siswa: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematik
Engagement is the effort that students make by directly contributing to achieving the goal of learning success. Student engagement is considered a predictor of improved learning pe...
Realizing the Need for Agentic AI for Subsurface Data and Workflows
Realizing the Need for Agentic AI for Subsurface Data and Workflows
Abstract Subsurface data consists of various types, and it is used in various business workflows. The efforts spent on performing data checks and running the work...
The Rise of Agentic Workflows: Why Businesses Are Adopting Them
The Rise of Agentic Workflows: Why Businesses Are Adopting Them
Agentic workflows represent the next evolutionary step beyond traditional robotic process automation (RPA) and simple rule-based orchestration. Unlike conventional automation tools...
SCNOC-Agentic: A Network Operation and Control Agentic for Satellite Communication Systems
SCNOC-Agentic: A Network Operation and Control Agentic for Satellite Communication Systems
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated powerful capability to solve practical problems through complex step-by-step reasoning. Specifically designed LLMs have begun to be i...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash ABSTRACT Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...

Back to Top