Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Designing Accountable Human–AI Teaming in Industrial Production: A Governance Framework for Agentic, Tool-Mediated Workflows
View through CrossRef
In industrial production, agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems combine goal-directed planning with tool-mediated execution and iterative monitoring across the manufacturing execution system, enterprise resource planning, and operational technology layers. Although this autonomy promises responsiveness under volatility, it redistributes decision rights across human supervisors, orchestrator agents, specialist agents, and product owners, turning accountability from a user-interface-level checkpoint into a workflow-level governance problem. Existing responsible-AI and governance research provides valuable principles; however, the following remain underspecified: operationalization of accountability, escalation and override rights, and minimally sufficient traceability in multi-agent production workflows. This study develops a conceptual accountability framework for human–agent–agent cooperation in industrial production. Drawing on a targeted synthesis of information systems and operations management literature, the framework specifies (i) core accountability dimensions for agentic workflows, (ii) a decision-class-anchored responsibility allocation inspired by the RACI framework, and (iii) a minimal evidence bundle for traceability and incident reconstruction, complemented by lifecycle assurance requirements. The framework is applied to a representative high-mix production scenario and refined through semi-structured expert interviews with senior practitioners from DAX-40 automotive manufacturers, a US-based software corporation, and globally leading consulting firms. The study provides actionable design guidelines for developing accountable agentic production systems. It reconceptualizes accountability as a workflow-level governance property, shifts algorithmic accountability from model-level attribution to decision-class-anchored responsibility allocation, and offers a compact design blueprint — comprising risk-calibrated control points, minimally sufficient traceability, and lifecycle governance — for deploying agentic AI in industrial production.
Title: Designing Accountable Human–AI Teaming in Industrial Production: A Governance Framework for Agentic, Tool-Mediated Workflows
Description:
In industrial production, agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems combine goal-directed planning with tool-mediated execution and iterative monitoring across the manufacturing execution system, enterprise resource planning, and operational technology layers.
Although this autonomy promises responsiveness under volatility, it redistributes decision rights across human supervisors, orchestrator agents, specialist agents, and product owners, turning accountability from a user-interface-level checkpoint into a workflow-level governance problem.
Existing responsible-AI and governance research provides valuable principles; however, the following remain underspecified: operationalization of accountability, escalation and override rights, and minimally sufficient traceability in multi-agent production workflows.
This study develops a conceptual accountability framework for human–agent–agent cooperation in industrial production.
Drawing on a targeted synthesis of information systems and operations management literature, the framework specifies (i) core accountability dimensions for agentic workflows, (ii) a decision-class-anchored responsibility allocation inspired by the RACI framework, and (iii) a minimal evidence bundle for traceability and incident reconstruction, complemented by lifecycle assurance requirements.
The framework is applied to a representative high-mix production scenario and refined through semi-structured expert interviews with senior practitioners from DAX-40 automotive manufacturers, a US-based software corporation, and globally leading consulting firms.
The study provides actionable design guidelines for developing accountable agentic production systems.
It reconceptualizes accountability as a workflow-level governance property, shifts algorithmic accountability from model-level attribution to decision-class-anchored responsibility allocation, and offers a compact design blueprint — comprising risk-calibrated control points, minimally sufficient traceability, and lifecycle governance — for deploying agentic AI in industrial production.
Related Results
Agentic AI Systems: Architectures, Autonomy, and Emergent Behaviours
Agentic AI Systems: Architectures, Autonomy, and Emergent Behaviours
<p><b><i><span>Background.</span></i></b><span> Agentic artificial intelligence systems, defined by their capacity to reason, plan, ...
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Smart manufacturing has been developed since the introduction of Industry 4.0. It consists of resource sharing and networking, predictive engineering, and material and data analyti...
Exploring Agentic AI in Healthcare: A Study on Its Working Mechanism
Exploring Agentic AI in Healthcare: A Study on Its Working Mechanism
Introduction
Rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have ushered in an era of hyperautomation and intelligent orchestration across multiple engineer...
Beyond the Principal-Agent Paradox: A Theory of Governance Failure and Mechanism Design in Agentic AI Systems
Beyond the Principal-Agent Paradox: A Theory of Governance Failure and Mechanism Design in Agentic AI Systems
Principal-agent theory has provided the dominant framework for understanding governance failure in organizational settings for five decades. This paper argues that agentic AI syste...
Realizing the Need for Agentic AI for Subsurface Data and Workflows
Realizing the Need for Agentic AI for Subsurface Data and Workflows
Abstract
Subsurface data consists of various types, and it is used in various business workflows. The efforts spent on performing data checks and running the work...
Agentic Engagement Siswa: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematik
Agentic Engagement Siswa: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematik
Engagement is the effort that students make by directly contributing to achieving the goal of learning success. Student engagement is considered a predictor of improved learning pe...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Study on the characteristics and synergistic effects of industrial complex networks – empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing
Study on the characteristics and synergistic effects of industrial complex networks – empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing
PurposeThe manufacturing industry and the producer service industry have a high degree of industrial correlation, and their integration will cause changes in the complex industrial...

