Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Glycemic control, HbA1c variability, and major cardiovascular adverse outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated cardiovascular risk: insights from the ACCORD study

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Although recent guidelines advocate for HbA1c target individualization, a comprehensive criterion for patient categorization remains absent. This study aimed to categorize HbA1c variability levels and explore the relationship between glycemic control, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality across different degrees of variability. Methods Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes study data were used. HbA1c variability was measured using the HbA1c variability score (HVS) and standard deviation (SD). K-means and K-medians clustering were used to combine the HVS and SD. Results K-means clustering was the most stable algorithm with the lowest clustering similarities. In the low variability group, intensive glucose-lowering treatment significantly reduced the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (HR: 0·78 [95% CI: 0·63, 0·97]) without increasing mortality risk (HR: 1·07 [0.81, 1·42]); the risk of adverse cardiovascular events (HR: 1·33 [1·14, 1·56]) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1·23 [1·01,1·51]) increased with increasing mean HbA1c. In the high variability group, treatment increased the risk of cardiovascular events (HR: 2.00 [1·54, 2·60]) and mortality (HR: 2·20 [1·66, 2·92]); a higher mean HbA1c (7·86%, [7·66%, 8·06%]) had the lowest mortality risk, when the mean HbA1c was < 7·86%, a higher mean HbA1c was associated with a lower mortality risk (HR: 0·63 [0·42, 0·95]). In the medium variability group, a mean HbA1c around 7·5% was associated with the lowest risk. Conclusions HbA1c variability can guide glycemic control targets for patients with type 2 diabetes. For patients with low variability, the lower the HbA1c, the lower the risk. For those with medium variability, controlling HbA1c at 7·5% provides the maximum benefit. For patients with high variability, a mean HbA1c of around 7·8% presents the lowest risk of all-cause mortality, a lower HbA1c did not provide cardiovascular benefits but instead increased the mortality risk. Further studies, especially those with patients that reflect the general population with type 2 diabetes undergoing the latest therapeutic approaches, are essential to validate the conclusions of this study.
Title: Glycemic control, HbA1c variability, and major cardiovascular adverse outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated cardiovascular risk: insights from the ACCORD study
Description:
Abstract Background Although recent guidelines advocate for HbA1c target individualization, a comprehensive criterion for patient categorization remains absent.
This study aimed to categorize HbA1c variability levels and explore the relationship between glycemic control, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality across different degrees of variability.
Methods Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes study data were used.
HbA1c variability was measured using the HbA1c variability score (HVS) and standard deviation (SD).
K-means and K-medians clustering were used to combine the HVS and SD.
Results K-means clustering was the most stable algorithm with the lowest clustering similarities.
In the low variability group, intensive glucose-lowering treatment significantly reduced the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (HR: 0·78 [95% CI: 0·63, 0·97]) without increasing mortality risk (HR: 1·07 [0.
81, 1·42]); the risk of adverse cardiovascular events (HR: 1·33 [1·14, 1·56]) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1·23 [1·01,1·51]) increased with increasing mean HbA1c.
In the high variability group, treatment increased the risk of cardiovascular events (HR: 2.
00 [1·54, 2·60]) and mortality (HR: 2·20 [1·66, 2·92]); a higher mean HbA1c (7·86%, [7·66%, 8·06%]) had the lowest mortality risk, when the mean HbA1c was < 7·86%, a higher mean HbA1c was associated with a lower mortality risk (HR: 0·63 [0·42, 0·95]).
In the medium variability group, a mean HbA1c around 7·5% was associated with the lowest risk.
Conclusions HbA1c variability can guide glycemic control targets for patients with type 2 diabetes.
For patients with low variability, the lower the HbA1c, the lower the risk.
For those with medium variability, controlling HbA1c at 7·5% provides the maximum benefit.
For patients with high variability, a mean HbA1c of around 7·8% presents the lowest risk of all-cause mortality, a lower HbA1c did not provide cardiovascular benefits but instead increased the mortality risk.
Further studies, especially those with patients that reflect the general population with type 2 diabetes undergoing the latest therapeutic approaches, are essential to validate the conclusions of this study.

Related Results

Undiagnosed Diabetes in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Silent Threat in Pakistan
Undiagnosed Diabetes in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Silent Threat in Pakistan
Diabetes mellitus (DM) has emerged as one of the most pressing public health challenges globally, and Pakistan stands among the countries most severely affected. With rising urbani...
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...
2391-PUB: Determinants of Poor Glycemic Control among Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes
2391-PUB: Determinants of Poor Glycemic Control among Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes
Objective: The majority of adolescents with type 1 diabetes have poor glycemic control, calling for an action to be taken. The aim of this study was to identify the determinants of...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Pregnancy and Challenging Transient Anti-GAD65 Positivity: A Case Report with Literature Review
Pregnancy and Challenging Transient Anti-GAD65 Positivity: A Case Report with Literature Review
Abstract Introduction During pregnancy, women may develop blood glucose abnormalities like gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or, rarely, type 1 diabetes (T1D), which can lead to ...
Long-Term HbA1c Variability and Cardiovascular Death: Insights from the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial
Long-Term HbA1c Variability and Cardiovascular Death: Insights from the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial
Abstract Background: Glucose variability has been associated with cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in type 2 diabetes, however, the interplay between glucose variability, empag...
Which combination is best for HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, and 2-h post-challenge glucose for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
Which combination is best for HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, and 2-h post-challenge glucose for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
Abstract Background We evaluated reliability among glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (75 g OGTT) where 2-h ...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...

Back to Top