Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Glycemic control, HbA1c variability, and major cardiovascular adverse outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated cardiovascular risk: insights from the ACCORD study
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Although recent guidelines advocate for HbA1c target individualization, a comprehensive criterion for patient categorization remains absent. This study aimed to categorize HbA1c variability levels and explore the relationship between glycemic control, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality across different degrees of variability.
Methods
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes study data were used. HbA1c variability was measured using the HbA1c variability score (HVS) and standard deviation (SD). K-means and K-medians clustering were used to combine the HVS and SD.
Results
K-means clustering was the most stable algorithm with the lowest clustering similarities. In the low variability group, intensive glucose-lowering treatment significantly reduced the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (HR: 0·78 [95% CI: 0·63, 0·97]) without increasing mortality risk (HR: 1·07 [0.81, 1·42]); the risk of adverse cardiovascular events (HR: 1·33 [1·14, 1·56]) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1·23 [1·01,1·51]) increased with increasing mean HbA1c. In the high variability group, treatment increased the risk of cardiovascular events (HR: 2.00 [1·54, 2·60]) and mortality (HR: 2·20 [1·66, 2·92]); a higher mean HbA1c (7·86%, [7·66%, 8·06%]) had the lowest mortality risk, when the mean HbA1c was < 7·86%, a higher mean HbA1c was associated with a lower mortality risk (HR: 0·63 [0·42, 0·95]). In the medium variability group, a mean HbA1c around 7·5% was associated with the lowest risk.
Conclusions
HbA1c variability can guide glycemic control targets for patients with type 2 diabetes. For patients with low variability, the lower the HbA1c, the lower the risk. For those with medium variability, controlling HbA1c at 7·5% provides the maximum benefit. For patients with high variability, a mean HbA1c of around 7·8% presents the lowest risk of all-cause mortality, a lower HbA1c did not provide cardiovascular benefits but instead increased the mortality risk. Further studies, especially those with patients that reflect the general population with type 2 diabetes undergoing the latest therapeutic approaches, are essential to validate the conclusions of this study.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Glycemic control, HbA1c variability, and major cardiovascular adverse outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated cardiovascular risk: insights from the ACCORD study
Description:
Abstract
Background
Although recent guidelines advocate for HbA1c target individualization, a comprehensive criterion for patient categorization remains absent.
This study aimed to categorize HbA1c variability levels and explore the relationship between glycemic control, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality across different degrees of variability.
Methods
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes study data were used.
HbA1c variability was measured using the HbA1c variability score (HVS) and standard deviation (SD).
K-means and K-medians clustering were used to combine the HVS and SD.
Results
K-means clustering was the most stable algorithm with the lowest clustering similarities.
In the low variability group, intensive glucose-lowering treatment significantly reduced the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (HR: 0·78 [95% CI: 0·63, 0·97]) without increasing mortality risk (HR: 1·07 [0.
81, 1·42]); the risk of adverse cardiovascular events (HR: 1·33 [1·14, 1·56]) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1·23 [1·01,1·51]) increased with increasing mean HbA1c.
In the high variability group, treatment increased the risk of cardiovascular events (HR: 2.
00 [1·54, 2·60]) and mortality (HR: 2·20 [1·66, 2·92]); a higher mean HbA1c (7·86%, [7·66%, 8·06%]) had the lowest mortality risk, when the mean HbA1c was < 7·86%, a higher mean HbA1c was associated with a lower mortality risk (HR: 0·63 [0·42, 0·95]).
In the medium variability group, a mean HbA1c around 7·5% was associated with the lowest risk.
Conclusions
HbA1c variability can guide glycemic control targets for patients with type 2 diabetes.
For patients with low variability, the lower the HbA1c, the lower the risk.
For those with medium variability, controlling HbA1c at 7·5% provides the maximum benefit.
For patients with high variability, a mean HbA1c of around 7·8% presents the lowest risk of all-cause mortality, a lower HbA1c did not provide cardiovascular benefits but instead increased the mortality risk.
Further studies, especially those with patients that reflect the general population with type 2 diabetes undergoing the latest therapeutic approaches, are essential to validate the conclusions of this study.
Related Results
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Diabetes knowledge and glycemic control among type 2 diabetes patients at public hospitals in Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
Diabetes knowledge and glycemic control among type 2 diabetes patients at public hospitals in Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
Background
Diabetes mellitus is a growing global health issue, especially in low- and middle-income countries like Ethiopia. To the best of our knowledge, the impact of diabetes kn...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Which combination is best for HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, and 2-h post-challenge glucose for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
Which combination is best for HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, and 2-h post-challenge glucose for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
Abstract
Background
We evaluated reliability among glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (75 g OGTT) where 2-h ...
Individualized Glycemic Index: A New Approach to Personalized Glycemic Control
Individualized Glycemic Index: A New Approach to Personalized Glycemic Control
ABSTRACT
Introduction
The assessment of glycemic control is fundamental for diabetes management. However, traditional measures ...
Targeting HbA1c: A strategy for cardiovascular disease prevention
Targeting HbA1c: A strategy for cardiovascular disease prevention
HbA1c, also referred to as glycated haemoglobin, is formed when glucose present in blood combines with haemoglobin present in red blood cells. Blood HbA1c levels are used to establ...
Relationship Between HbA1c in 3rd Trimester & Pregnancy Outcome of Patients with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Relationship Between HbA1c in 3rd Trimester & Pregnancy Outcome of Patients with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Background: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is a condition characterized by glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy. It affects approximately 7% of...
A Multi-Polygenic Risk Score Approach Incorporating Physical Activity Genotypes for Predicting Type 2 Diabetes and Associated Comorbidities: A FinnGen Study
A Multi-Polygenic Risk Score Approach Incorporating Physical Activity Genotypes for Predicting Type 2 Diabetes and Associated Comorbidities: A FinnGen Study
ABSTRACT
Aims/hypothesis
Genetic prediction of type 2 diabetes risk has proven difficult using current methods. Recent studies ...

