Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Glycemic control, HbA1c variability, and major cardiovascular adverse outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated cardiovascular risk: insights from the ACCORD study
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Although recent guidelines advocate for HbA1c target individualization, a comprehensive criterion for patient categorization remains absent. This study aimed to categorize HbA1c variability levels and explore the relationship between glycemic control, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality across different degrees of variability.
Methods
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes study data were used. HbA1c variability was measured using the HbA1c variability score (HVS) and standard deviation (SD). K-means and K-medians clustering were used to combine the HVS and SD.
Results
K-means clustering was the most stable algorithm with the lowest clustering similarities. In the low variability group, intensive glucose-lowering treatment significantly reduced the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (HR: 0·78 [95% CI: 0·63, 0·97]) without increasing mortality risk (HR: 1·07 [0.81, 1·42]); the risk of adverse cardiovascular events (HR: 1·33 [1·14, 1·56]) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1·23 [1·01,1·51]) increased with increasing mean HbA1c. In the high variability group, treatment increased the risk of cardiovascular events (HR: 2.00 [1·54, 2·60]) and mortality (HR: 2·20 [1·66, 2·92]); a higher mean HbA1c (7·86%, [7·66%, 8·06%]) had the lowest mortality risk, when the mean HbA1c was < 7·86%, a higher mean HbA1c was associated with a lower mortality risk (HR: 0·63 [0·42, 0·95]). In the medium variability group, a mean HbA1c around 7·5% was associated with the lowest risk.
Conclusions
HbA1c variability can guide glycemic control targets for patients with type 2 diabetes. For patients with low variability, the lower the HbA1c, the lower the risk. For those with medium variability, controlling HbA1c at 7·5% provides the maximum benefit. For patients with high variability, a mean HbA1c of around 7·8% presents the lowest risk of all-cause mortality, a lower HbA1c did not provide cardiovascular benefits but instead increased the mortality risk. Further studies, especially those with patients that reflect the general population with type 2 diabetes undergoing the latest therapeutic approaches, are essential to validate the conclusions of this study.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Glycemic control, HbA1c variability, and major cardiovascular adverse outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated cardiovascular risk: insights from the ACCORD study
Description:
Abstract
Background
Although recent guidelines advocate for HbA1c target individualization, a comprehensive criterion for patient categorization remains absent.
This study aimed to categorize HbA1c variability levels and explore the relationship between glycemic control, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality across different degrees of variability.
Methods
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes study data were used.
HbA1c variability was measured using the HbA1c variability score (HVS) and standard deviation (SD).
K-means and K-medians clustering were used to combine the HVS and SD.
Results
K-means clustering was the most stable algorithm with the lowest clustering similarities.
In the low variability group, intensive glucose-lowering treatment significantly reduced the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (HR: 0·78 [95% CI: 0·63, 0·97]) without increasing mortality risk (HR: 1·07 [0.
81, 1·42]); the risk of adverse cardiovascular events (HR: 1·33 [1·14, 1·56]) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1·23 [1·01,1·51]) increased with increasing mean HbA1c.
In the high variability group, treatment increased the risk of cardiovascular events (HR: 2.
00 [1·54, 2·60]) and mortality (HR: 2·20 [1·66, 2·92]); a higher mean HbA1c (7·86%, [7·66%, 8·06%]) had the lowest mortality risk, when the mean HbA1c was < 7·86%, a higher mean HbA1c was associated with a lower mortality risk (HR: 0·63 [0·42, 0·95]).
In the medium variability group, a mean HbA1c around 7·5% was associated with the lowest risk.
Conclusions
HbA1c variability can guide glycemic control targets for patients with type 2 diabetes.
For patients with low variability, the lower the HbA1c, the lower the risk.
For those with medium variability, controlling HbA1c at 7·5% provides the maximum benefit.
For patients with high variability, a mean HbA1c of around 7·8% presents the lowest risk of all-cause mortality, a lower HbA1c did not provide cardiovascular benefits but instead increased the mortality risk.
Further studies, especially those with patients that reflect the general population with type 2 diabetes undergoing the latest therapeutic approaches, are essential to validate the conclusions of this study.
Related Results
Which combination is best for HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, and 2-h post-challenge glucose for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
Which combination is best for HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, and 2-h post-challenge glucose for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
Abstract
Background
We evaluated reliability among glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (75 g OGTT) where 2-h ...
Individualized Glycemic Index: A New Approach to Personalized Glycemic Control
Individualized Glycemic Index: A New Approach to Personalized Glycemic Control
ABSTRACTIntroductionThe assessment of glycemic control is fundamental for diabetes management. However, traditional measures have limitations, including susceptibility to non-glyce...
A Multi-Polygenic Risk Score Approach Incorporating Physical Activity Genotypes for Predicting Type 2 Diabetes and Associated Comorbidities: A FinnGen Study
A Multi-Polygenic Risk Score Approach Incorporating Physical Activity Genotypes for Predicting Type 2 Diabetes and Associated Comorbidities: A FinnGen Study
ABSTRACT
Aims/hypothesis
Genetic prediction of type 2 diabetes risk has proven difficult using current methods. Recent studies have shown...
Diabetes Mellitus, Preoperative Glycemic Control and Postoperative Outcomes: A Multi-Ethnic Asian Perspective
Diabetes Mellitus, Preoperative Glycemic Control and Postoperative Outcomes: A Multi-Ethnic Asian Perspective
Background:
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a critical risk factor associated with postoperative complications. Preoperative glycemic control, commonly assessed by glycated h...
Inverted U-shaped relationship between HbA1c and diabetic retinopathy in diabetic patients: a cross-sectional study
Inverted U-shaped relationship between HbA1c and diabetic retinopathy in diabetic patients: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness among adults with diabetes. Glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) is a cr...
Inverted U-Shaped Relationship between HbA1c and Diabetic Retinopathy in Diabetic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Inverted U-Shaped Relationship between HbA1c and Diabetic Retinopathy in Diabetic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness among adults with diabetes. Glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) is a critical biomarker for long-...
Twenty‐four‐hour variations in blood glucose level in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients based on continuous glucose monitoring
Twenty‐four‐hour variations in blood glucose level in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients based on continuous glucose monitoring
AbstractAims/IntroductionHigh fluctuations in blood glucose are associated with various complications. The correlation between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level and fluctuations in...
Influence of serum ferritin on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Influence of serum ferritin on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Objective: To determine the influence of serum ferritin levels on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. S...

